Cleveland "Job Bank Mother" sends nasty rejection e-mail to jobseeker

[blackbeltninja]

^That I can well believe.

Our institutional Ethics Review application in order to start any preclinical or clinical trial work has ballooned in the last 3 years from 18 to 30 pages worth of schpiel needing to be dealt with. Just when you think they can't possibly ask any more questions...

Seems like everyone loves to get everyone else stuck into a big ball of red tape.

-d-

 

[medic1]

I'd be looking at job applicant's Facebook and Twitter account immediately if I had to employ someone

I take it you are talking about "escorts"? Preferably, white, educated, an absolute non-american, oh yeah, and did i mention white?

 

[borg69unimatrix]

^That I can well believe.

Our institutional Ethics Review application in order to start any preclinical or clinical trial work has ballooned in the last 3 years from 18 to 30 pages worth of schpiel needing to be dealt with. Just when you think they can't possibly ask any more questions...

Seems like everyone loves to get everyone else stuck into a big ball of red tape.

-d-

I-9's used to be 1 page front and back. Our government decided to make them 9 pages of required garbage NO one reads but we're required to hand out.

 

[maxpowr9]

This is also why as a person in a hiring position, I told HR to reject any person with a LinkedIn profile on their resume regardless of its content. I cast them off as a self-serving fuckwit who has no place at our company.

 

[MissAnne]

You know, I have a LinkedIn but it really is for nothing. I hardly ever use it. Every once in a while somoene I know will connect with me but then it will go dead again.

This woman is horrible. Did she really need to waste her time in writing that nasty letter ? Couldn't she have just not replied. People are disgusting.

 

[Kulindahr]

I'm thinking about sending those of you who do HR or HR-type work a copy of my resume and a typical cover letter I'd send out just to see what your thoughts on it would be. Don't blazek me though, please.

My interviews have always been done hands-on in the field, so I can't help.

Somebody has to deal with every stupid question or every personal complaint in an office workplace, sadly. But if you really want to know what wastes the vast majority of my time, it is neither applicants nor people who can't follow instructions. It's having to deal with our private insurance system-- getting people signed up, signed off, and handling the paperwork of the reimbursements. It's beyond ridiculous. Offices and particularly medical offices have to have full time staff just for handling this because it's so inefficient.

The clinic I'm no going to for pain management has a full-time staffer who does nothing but deal with getting insurance companies to stay on top of what they're supposed to be paying. She doesn't deal with submitting charges, just with when things wander.

 

[Kulindahr]

You know, I have a LinkedIn but it really is for nothing. I hardly ever use it. Every once in a while somoene I know will connect with me but then it will go dead again.

This woman is horrible. Did she really need to waste her time in writing that nasty letter ? Couldn't she have just not replied. People are disgusting.

Half the world needs anger management classes.

 

[borg69unimatrix]

I'm thinking about sending those of you who do HR or HR-type work a copy of my resume and a typical cover letter I'd send out just to see what your thoughts on it would be. Don't blazek me though, please.

I'm finding it interesting reading these how each of us has our own unique "do's and don't's" tailored to depend on the businesses we work in. Unfortunately it kind of tells me that there really is very little "right and wrong", and it's still left up to chance and first impressions - and maybe some luck or whom you know on the inside. What might work for one of us wouldn't get past the others.

... although I am intrigued to see your resume.

Chances are, you're asking for too much $$$ at an entry level. Newb's always want to start at the top instead of proving themselves, and working their way there.