Clinton suggests race will be over next week

[NickCole]

Midnight has done a good job of sumarizing the data, but I'm not ready to jump on his anti-feminist wagon. I'm still not convinced that Sen. Clinton's supporters here at JUB (with a very few exceptions) support her only because she is a woman.

IMO he's done a good job of summarizing nonsense.

But it does illustrate one side of the differences between Obama and Clinton, and what their supporters value. The Democratic talking point that there is very little difference between them, therefore the party will unify by November, is trying to make something true because the DNC wants it to be true. I could argue the same stuff I've argued for months now but the bottom line is I think Obama supporters' complaints about Clinton are nonsense and Obama supporters think my claims about Obama are nonsense. I'm heavily outnumbered here but the truth is that's not the case in the Democratic electorate, as demonstrated yet again yesterday when Clinton trounced Obama by 60% -- while Clinton has won huge victories in the past month, Obama has not.

 

[MystikWizard]

You mean you backpedaled.

Direct quote: "I am a White Male, so I really have no single prejudice..."

The causal conjunction is explicit.

Unless pressed, you clearly consider your white male status sufficient evidence that you could never be prejudiced... Which, against the context of the history of this nation, is ironic to say the least.

You are playing a piss poor game of semantics. I repeatedly said I have also proven by my actions that I don't have a single prejudice in this election. And that is the case. And all of that is on record in my post history, so there's nothing that can be done to change that.

How about we change 3 words in my original quote.

"I am a white Male that does not have a single prejudice ...".

What point you are trying to prove is beyond me. It is obvious that being a White Male is not enough to disqualify someone from necessarily having certain prejudices, something poorly worded in my original post .... and it's also obvious by my posts that I don't believe that either ... otherwise I wouldn't be leveling the charges against the Clinton supporters who are Feminists, something I have argued back and forth with them on for over 7 months now.

And as far as Construct's comments, there are more on this board that are doing just that, then I think you are giving credit to, and I would read off the list, but obviously I am not going to do so, to save them from being put on the spot. But yes, there are some on here that I believe are not supporting her because of her gender, but for other reasons.