The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Cocktales - Archived Blog Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
stahler.gif


So, over the week-end we find out that VP Cheney was off on another one of his infamous hunting trips some where in the vast lands of the U.S. ......and now the rest of the story!!

DALLAS - Vice President Dick Cheney was hunting illegally - without the required $7 stamp on his license for quail - when he accidentally shot one of his hunting partners, Texas Parks and Wildlife officials said Monday.
And so was Harry Whittington, 78, who was recovering Monday from a shotgun blast to the face, neck and chest.
In its report, the state agency that oversees hunting and fishing said it found that neither Cheney nor Whittington had purchased the game bird stamp required to hunt quail in Texas, although both had valid hunting licenses. Both will get warning citations, and there will be no fine or other penalty.
Cheney's office said Monday he hadn't realized he was lacking the proper stamp and has since sent a $7 check to the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
"I don't know how they missed it," said Cheney spokeswoman Jennifer Mayfield. A statement from Cheney's office said his staff had asked for applicable permits and would "take whatever steps are needed to comply with applicable rules."
Cheney has not commented publicly about the accident, which took place on the 50,000-acre Armstrong Ranch in Kennedy County on Saturday afternoon.

Some people wonder why the VP has NOT had a press conference to tell of the hunting accident...Well, you must not know much about the VP then.........He has NOT had a press conference since about 2002 and since he dis-likes anything with a microphone/camera, there's your answer.

You can bet the President knew about the incident just as soon as he could be contacted....Knowing it was an accident, and thinking the victim was not in danger and well care for, the President did NOT think it necessary to fuel the media with the incident until 24 hours later....

I don't think a crime has been committed here; except for the two gentlemen who did NOT have the proper hunting licenses: VP Cheney and his shooting victim Mr. Whittington.....and they will be fined for their mis-givings...(You know, I cannot believe VP Cheney's handlers did NOT know about the additional license necessary for his visit to hunt quail...just NO excuse for staff persons of their calibre!)

I wonder why this story is such a big issue, except for the poor man getting "peppered" with bird shot....I understand that's no picnic!!!
 
060114_VegasTheater_hsmall.widec.jpg


When Harvey Fierstein announced he would reprise his Tony-winning "Hairspray" turn in—of all places—Las Vegas, it looked as if Sin City's dream of becoming Broadway West might come true. "Las Vegas could be like the old vaudeville circuit, a place where lighter entertainment could find a home," says Fierstein, who's rumored to be getting seven figures for a three-month run when the musical opens Feb. 6 at the Luxor casino. "To the people who say that's a bastardization of Broadway: we're in the entertainment business. That's what we do."

For the nay-sayers who do not believe Las Vegas "can" sell tickets to broadway shows, Mama Mia did very well here for they were sold out almost every night.

You cannot treat Las Vegas like New York City, for you have much different people here....

The trick is finding shows that appeal to fidgety tourists used to Cirque du Soleil-style spectacles. Some producers are shrinking their musicals for Vegas. Several numbers have been trimmed from "Hairspray" to make it a lean 90 minutes with no intermission. "The way we cut it and shaped it, it's more like launching a rocket," says Fierstein. Andrew Lloyd Webber and Harold Prince have restaged—and nearly halved—their two-and-a-half-hour "Phantom of the Opera" for its Vegas debut this May, and "Spamalot" will be similarly bite-size when it opens in early 2007.

I know we cannot wait to taste some Broadway, even if it's a cut-down version that's made 'specially for the Vegas crowd, we'll pay to see them!
 
nn_pwms_ports_060220.300w.jpg


A company in the United Arab Emirates [Dubai Ports World] is poised to take over significant operations at six American ports as part of a corporate sale, leaving a country with ties to the (alleged -ed) Sept. 11 hijackers with influence over a maritime industry considered vulnerable to terrorism.

The $6.8 billion sale is expected to be approved soon.

DP World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry.....

Questioning the United Arab Emirates' track record in the War on Terror, seven U.S. lawmakers said Thursday they want a committee led by Treasury Secretary John Snow to thoroughly review a deal that would let a UAE-based firm run six major U.S. ports.

If the approval is unchallenged, Dubai Ports World would run the ports of New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.

Considering Dubai Ports World taking over control of 6 of the U.S.'s biggest ports should and must cause some concern since the FBI has also concluded that the UAE's banking system filtered much of the money used for the operational planning before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and many of the hijackers traveled to the United States through the UAE.

Sure, the U.S. and the UAE (United Arab Emirates) have joined together on some terrorist deterrents; but still one has to think of the security of the U.S.

Some facts about the UAE:

– The UAE was one of three countries in the world to recognize the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan.

– The UAE has been a key transfer point for illegal shipments of nuclear components to Iran, North Korea and Lybia.

– After 9/11, the Treasury Department reported that the UAE was not cooperating in efforts to track down Osama Bin Laden’s bank accounts.

The same company was bidding in the UK recently - the problem was price, not security. Another bidder got involved.

The company is more concerned with investing the current windfall oil receipts and getting a good return for the time when their oil stops flowing (alot of the members of the UAE are running out).

Of course it is a ‘concern’ but the same could be said about Citgo and Chavez’s threat to shut down his US refineries.

The problem is that it’s on US soil and the US is perfectly capable of nationalizing it/forcing operations to continue.

That said, the decision to buy the ports is a bad one. This company has a history of overpaying for assets that yield a steady cashflow (which is why they are popular - they’re bondlike in character because the returns are fairly stable).

UAE has differing levels of ‘modernity’ among the members that constitute it. Abu Dhabi and Dubai are very modern and very attractive to Westerners. Some of the others are ‘backward’.

That said, they’ve got one of the largest Formula One race tracks and the jockeys on their camels are now robotic. (they realized that with Westerners buying up all the property on their fake Palm Islands that child jockeys didn’t fit).

Dubai also is becoming a pretty big financial center.

The lack of other bidders suggests that they are overpaying, probably by alot. Their forecast depends on the US influx of goods staying about at current levels or increasing - which can only happen if foreigners are willing to continue to finance our dissaving.

I do hope a bi-partisan group of Congress will take a closer look at to what extent the ports will be out-sourced and how closely controlled or monitored the U.S. will be over the company taking over power.

I do hope we are NOT allowing the fox into the hen house where the chickens are asleep.......this just might be the key for terrorists getting into the U.S. with WMD type materials, etc.....
 
_399471_tupac300.jpg

2Pac was gunned down in Las Vegas three years ago

After a Metro officer was shot and killed by a rapper with an assault rifle, Metro Sheriff Bill Young called for a ban on gangsta rap acts at valley casinos.

"The entertainment industry," the sheriff said, "should be ashamed of itself for promoting this gangster rap genre that espouses violence, mistreatment of women, hatred for the authority of police officers and emulates drug dealers and two-bit thugs.

"It's not a good message for our young people, and it's not a good message for our community."

That applies, Young said, across the entire spectrum of rap music, including mainstream performers such as 50 Cent and Snoop Dogg.

"50 Cent is one of the worst," Young said. "His whole act is predicated on violence. He's a mentor for all of the other gangster rappers in the making."

Although rap is largely performed by black artists, it draws a big white audience - something that has helped it become the biggest-selling music in the US. Aggression plays up to the white middle-class image of urban black life, they say.

Now, Stavros Anthony, a university regent and a Metro Captain, is proposing a ban on any gangster rap shows at college venues like the Thomas and Mack Center on the UNLV campus.

Critics say the ban would be unconstitutional. I would hope someone would just try and take the good Las Vegas Sheriff to trial and challenge the validity of said ban on gangsta rap and see what the courts have to say about said freedom of speech with all the filthy words and actions to kill cops, etc.......Just wonder which way the courts will decide.......Hmmmm????
 
queer_globe.gif


Well, well, finally the world of Gay travel is becoming the "in" thing!!

Well it's no secret that queers spend a lot of money on traveling each year but the industry hasn't always been so open nor has every destination been so welcoming.

The world travel industry finally seems to be coming out of the closet.

Curacao actively courts queers and launches their new website Gay Curacao.

After years of banning gay couples Sandals reversed their long standing homophobic policy banning gay couples from their resorts and now and now Sandals Resorts allows gay couples to holiday with their straight counterparts.

Orbitz.com launched a gay marketing campaign over a year ago along with a special Orbitz gay travel website.

The publisher of Out and Advocate has been more heavily marketing their gay travel magazine, Out Traveler this year.

If you have NOT been to Palm Springs,CA before, then you would be shocked or I hope pleasantly surprised just how much the City of Palm Springs envelopes the Gays of their fair city and totally make them citizens without any discrimination.........that, my friends is the way diversity is totally spread.......way to go Palm Springs! Why not go there and see for yourselves what a great place (Gay) it is ............too! LOL
 
I can’t help but wonder why there are so many people who freak out over the mere mention of a gay sex act (let alone a gay person). Why they are so concerned with what someone else does with their body. Do they find heterosex so distasteful that they believe anyone who is given a choice between gay and straight will choose gay?

I know there are strong cultural taboos–in the United States, and just about everywhere else. That doesn’t make it any more understandable to me, though. Despite all the politicking (bans on gay marriage, gay adoption, etc), things have gotten better for gay people in my part of the world–even just over the course of the last 10 years. I really do believe that (assuming fascists don’t seize power and start sending us to camps) things are only going to get progressively better in the USA for the homos. It just has to since many of the countries of the West are actually allowing Gay marriages....we must have hope that the U.S. will finally "see-the-light" too!

In other places, though, the outlook is foggier. For instance, look at the Arabs and their not so good outlook as far as being Gay openly. Also look at Africa and their predicament with HIV/AIDS and being openly Gay...NOT!

When will conditions exist for Africans to have their own Stonewall Rebellion? For Arabs and other Muslims? Is one possible?
 
9579281.jpg


I was just writing on a thread in JUB (Hot Topics) about Willie Nelson's concert in Florida tonight and just thought I'd blog about him and his contribution to "The Year Of The Gays"........2006!!!

Willie's Nelson's beautiful new song "Cowboys are Frequently Secretly Fond of Each Other" is just the tip of the iceberg during what appears to be the start of a gay revolution. In only a month and a half, 2006 has brought us both Brokeback Mountain (to which Willie contributed another powerful song "He Was a Friend of Mine"), Transamerica (featuring gay icon Dolly Parton comparing gender reassignment surgery to being born again Christian) and now Willie's ode to gay romance. As an out, proud, country music-loving gay American, I believe the brave direction these artists have taken does not contradict the tradition of country music in the least. Country music has always been about telling real people's stories, and not always just those people who society is eager to embrace or accept.

Country music is about real people, and gay/transgendered people are just as real as anyone else. Whether you are open-minded about gay issues or not, you certainly must applaud these pioneers for reminding us that country doesn't just have to be sappy, rehashed pop melodies with meaningless lyrics performed by vocally-midiocre studs and chicks in expensive cowboy boots. I tip my hat to Willie Nelson for his honesty and bravery in recording this song.

......and continuining with the thought, I think 2006 is only the start of a new revolution for Gays and new freedoms coming our way that we have fought for, for years finally happening in the years to come....

I do NOT know how the U.S. will be able to hold our civil rights down considering how so many other countries are finally seeing that Gay people are human too and should be granted those basic rights that others assume without discrimination and hatred against them!

My Gay friends, do NOT give up hope for Gay rights to come!! (*8*) (*8*) :kiss: :kiss:
 
030106irsWarn.jpg



IRS Tax Warning for Same-Sex Couples........

Just a thought... but I wonder what they would do if every single gay couple in America filed joint tax returns (where it was beneficial for them to do so), AND refused to pay the penalties.

They can’t lock us all up. Just a thought. Gandhi would have loved this.

(Washington) The Internal Revenue Service has begun warning tax preparers, businesses and state governments that same-sex couples legally married in Massachusetts or registered as domestic partners in states such as California and New Jersey must file separate income tax forms.

Tax returns this year must be filed by April 17.

Citing the so-called Federal Defense of Marriage Act the IRS says that the US government does not recognize anything other than legally married opposite-sex couples.

The law allows straight couples who are married to divide their incomes when they file jointly, usually meaning a lower tax rate.

Attempts to file a joint returns could lead to fines or other penalties.

It is not the first time the IRS has issued a warning. A similar one came out after same-sex couple began marrying in Massachusetts.

Last year a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by a gay couple in Minnesota claiming they deserved a tax refund because they were legally married and should be granted married taxpayer status.

People who receive health insurance from their state or local government or through their employer for their spouses or domestic partners are additionally hit with taxes.

Spousal health benefits are not taxed. But, since the IRS does not recognize gay relationships the benefits are considered income. In some cases the tax outweighs any savings.

Rhode Island extended health and insurance benefits to the domestic partners of state workers in 2001 but last month realized it had not withheld federal taxes on those benefits. Some workers owe up to five years in back taxes that the state forgot to collect through payroll deductions.

A study in 2004 shows that gay families pay on average higher taxes and get fewer benefits.

After all is said and done, where the hell is our Gay Bill of Rights as citizens of states and of the United States??

Dammit, we are couples who are good citizens, who pay their taxes, so what good comes to the good people who do what they are suppose to do??

Remember the motion picture "Network"? Remember what everyone did when finally everyone came to the breaking point?

"We're Mad As Hell, And We're Not Gonna Take It Anymore"!!!
 
mtrush.jpg



"We talk a great deal about patriotism.

What do we mean by patriotism in the context of our times?

I venture to suggest that what we mean is a sense of national responsibility which will enable America to remain master of her power -- to walk with it in serenity and wisdom, with self-respect and the respect of all mankind; a patriotism that puts country ahead of self; a patriotism which is not short, frenzied outbursts of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime.

The dedication of a lifetime -- these are words that are easy to utter, but this is a mighty assignment. For it is often easier to fight for principles than to live up to them."

Is this kind of American patriotism dead?

I did NOT write the above "used" words of wisdom; but I wish I had....for it was written by an extremely intelligent man, perhaps too intelligent to be in a position of higher power than in the U.S. Senate.....

Perhaps, if he had become President of the U.S., the succeeding generations after his demise, the U.S. and perhaps even the world would have been indeed a greater place of patriotism!

You see the quoted statement in this blog was written by a man I really, really am pleased to aspire to imitate in my patriotism as a U.S. citizen and citizen of the World...........................


- Adlai Stevenson, Speech to the American Legion Convention in New York City (27 August 1952)
 
brokeback_mountain_2005_review_middle.jpg


After Ang Lee won as Best Director for Brokeback Mountain, most people thought it was only logical that BBM should/would also win as Best Picture for 2006....NOT!


I thought Ang Lee made a beautiful acceptance speech for Best Director when he said that he hoped that this win for him is a signal that people are finally accepting love between two people no matter if they are same sex or not...

Let's hope that indeed Hollywood and the world have come a long way in accepting Gays and that no longer would they be bashed and battered for showing their love for one another...

I cannot but hope that this year of so many gay-themed movies will signal the beginning of acceptance and NOT homophobia.
 
petersonbooksmall_01.jpg


I am certain all of you are familiar with the different "jelly" colored wrist bands that are sold to help many different charities out there.....This is a fad that has brought recognition and much needed money to help find cures to many diseases....

If there was one thing that could kill the presumably unstoppable fad started by Lance Armstrong, it would be to associate the fashionable accessories with a murdering scumbag like Scott Peterson.

Is nothing sacred to this man?

Hmmmmm, know what the "Pretty Boy" is doing now?

Having killed his wife Laci Peterson and their unborn child, Scott Peterson has set his sights on his next victim, the trendy wristbands worn in support of charitable causes.

The website Justice4Scott is now selling blue and red wristbands embedded with the words “Justice4Scott.” As opposed to a charity, like cancer research or animal welfare, the proceeds from the sales of these bracelets are set to go to the Peterson family, evidentally to support his ongoing defense.

I am out-raged about this and hope the rest of you are too......

I also have a question for the Save Scott Peterson folks: what is the fascination with Scott? It strikes me as a little creepy.

Of course he is not the only murderer to have admirers and evidently it is common for convicted killers to get all kinds of fan/love mail from people of the opposite sex. I have heard that he has received many proposals of marriage!!!

But I for one just do NOT get it and hope that this insult to a just cause does NOT ruin the original idea of raising money for something that's useful for a large majority of people who need it out there....
 
kanab.jpg


HEY! Don't let the HOT cowboy fool you, you are NOT welcome here in Kanab, Utah!

In Kanab, Utah on the 10th of January 2006, the City Council unamiously adopted the natural family resolution
that:

l Labels marriage between a man and a woman as "ordained of God."
l Sees homes as "open to a full quiver of children."
l Envisions young women "growing into wives, homemakers and mothers and . . . young men growing into husbands, home builders and fathers."

Many are afraid the nonbinding resolution would stigmatize the community as intolerant and discourage business and visitors to the area in southern Utah.

The resolution, containing provisions like only marriage between a man and a woman is ordained by God, drove a divisive wedge into the southern Utah community of about 4,000 residents.

I have to add some relevant information: Kanab is near the border of Utah and Arizona: Polygamists central. Fundamentalist Mormons at their finest. Orthodoxy LDS at the root of every aspect of secular life in this part of Southern Utah. Little difference between State and Church. These people live as far from the legal arm in Salt Lake City or Phoenix as physically possible while attempting to let the world pass them by. The Attorney-G.s in both states have quietly ignored these people because they live in utter remote wilderness. The only harm they feel they do is that they may have the corner of the market on gingham at the local Yard Barn.

This “non-binding” resolution is a product from an ultra-conservative dunk-tank called the Sutherland Institute. Their agenda: Make life hell for all single people. Singlehood is evil. Relegate anyone not married to a second-class status because they’re not doing what the Bible says.

And just what is their meaning of 'natural'? I'm single and, yet, I feel natural. When I am with my family I feel natural. I came from the same womb as any other sibling. Doesn't that qualify me as natural as any other person?

I think the almighty dollar should/would be the answer to fighting back against this attack on the Gays/singles and other non-specific type of people wanted by the City of Kanab, Utah. If people do not come to visit and stay and buy anything in this town, I think the council will either re-think their bigoted decision and go back to the way things were or else the city will just dry up and blow away in the desert of Utah.......
 
kanab.jpg


HEY! Don't let the HOT cowboy fool you, you are NOT welcome here in Kanab, Utah!

In Kanab, Utah on the 10th of January 2006, the City Council unamiously adopted the natural family resolution
that:

l Labels marriage between a man and a woman as "ordained of God."
l Sees homes as "open to a full quiver of children."
l Envisions young women "growing into wives, homemakers and mothers and . . . young men growing into husbands, home builders and fathers."

Many are afraid the nonbinding resolution would stigmatize the community as intolerant and discourage business and visitors to the area in southern Utah.

The resolution, containing provisions like only marriage between a man and a woman is ordained by God, drove a divisive wedge into the southern Utah community of about 4,000 residents.

I have to add some relevant information: Kanab is near the border of Utah and Arizona: Polygamists central. Fundamentalist Mormons at their finest. Orthodoxy LDS at the root of every aspect of secular life in this part of Southern Utah. Little difference between State and Church. These people live as far from the legal arm in Salt Lake City or Phoenix as physically possible while attempting to let the world pass them by. The Attorney-G.s in both states have quietly ignored these people because they live in utter remote wilderness. The only harm they feel they do is that they may have the corner of the market on gingham at the local Yard Barn.

This “non-binding” resolution is a product from an ultra-conservative dunk-tank called the Sutherland Institute. Their agenda: Make life hell for all single people. Singlehood is evil. Relegate anyone not married to a second-class status because they’re not doing what the Bible says.

And just what is their meaning of 'natural'? I'm single and, yet, I feel natural. When I am with my family I feel natural. I came from the same womb as any other sibling. Doesn't that qualify me as natural as any other person?

I think the almighty dollar should/would be the answer to fighting back against this attack on the Gays/singles and other non-specific type of people wanted by the City of Kanab, Utah. If people do not come to visit and stay and buy anything in this town, I think the council will either re-think their bigoted decision and go back to the way things were or else the city will just dry up and blow away in the desert of Utah.......
 
pic_dak_border_pr115011640482.jpg


In 1964, liberal reformers and labor activists succeeded in persuading the Democratic Congress to abolish the hated Bracero program, which brought in low-wage guest workers from Mexico to labor as serfs in the U.S. Like slavery and contract labor ("coolie labor"), the Bracero program violated a basic principle of American society: There shall not be a two-tier labor market. Employers must not be allowed to pit indentured servants or slaves with no rights, or limited rights, against citizen-workers on American soil.

How times change. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the leader of the Democratic minority in the U.S. Senate, has threatened a filibuster against a bill by Republican Senator Bill Frist that would seek to enforce control of U.S. borders, unless Frist includes a truly terrible plan to add half a million indentured servants to the U.S. workforce each year--a proposal backed for years by former Texas Senator Phil Gramm, a far-right reactionary, and now supported by Senator Ted Kennedy along with Senator John McCain, one of the most conservative members of the U.S. Senate. The Democratic Party, having abolished the horrible Bracero program, now insists on reviving it.

It has been proven that along stretches of the U.S. border where stringent enforcement efforts including fencing have been undertaken, illegal immigration has indeed been dramatically reduced. It would be reduced further, to be sure, if employers of illegal immigrants were fined or sent to jail for violating U.S. labor laws, as they ought to be. But the U.S. can and should control its southern border, by a combination of fencing and expanded Border Patrol enforcement. After 9/11, it is imperative to do so, for reasons of national security alone. What is the point of securing the airports and ports, if half a million people simply stroll into our country across the southern border every year with impunity?

You can't possibly make any amnesty or guest-worker program work, then, unless you have previously sealed the border against illegal immigration and have the capacity and public resolve to arrest and deport every foreigner in the U.S. who refuses to abide by the provisions of immigration reform--whatever those provisions may be. Senator Reid is completely wrong. Border control is a necessary precondition for any successful immigration reform, including the only one that is compatible with the prevention of a two-tier labor market--namely, a complete amnesty and full citizenship for most illegal immigrants already here. Here's what the agenda should be: Control the borders first, discuss the terms of an amnesty later--oh, and, by the way, ban guest workers and all other kinds of indentured servants, apart from a tiny number of well-paid professionals with green cards.

Law and order is a centrist issue, not a far-right issue, and preventing millions of foreigners each year from violating our nation's immigration laws with impunity is the central law and order issue of our time. If the Democrats follow Senator Reid's lead on this issue, they will hand the Republican Party the wedge issue of all wedge issues. Think of the ads: "It's against the law to enter our country illegally. And yet the Democrats led a filibuster in the United States Senate to prevent the law from being enforced."

We MUST control our borders, control who comes into this country, know who they are, where they are, and what they are doing. I think 9/11 should make it perfectly clear that NOT knowing who we have in the U.S. will lead to further problems with those who want to do harm to the citizens of this country....

It doesn't matter which party does it; but all must agree to have a singular policy to enforce legals vs illegals in our country no matter which way we do it.....Just Do It!!!
 
2graffiti.jpg


Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman has suggested that those who deface freeways with graffiti should have their thumbs cut off on television.

Goodman, appearing Wednesday on the "Nevada Newsmakers" television show, said, "In the old days in France, they had beheading of people who commit heinous crimes.

"You know, we have a beautiful highway landscaping redevelopment in our downtown. We have desert tortoises and beautiful paintings of flora and fauna. These punks come along and deface it.

"I'm saying maybe you put them on TV and cut off a thumb," the mayor added. "That may be the right thing to do."

Goodman also suggested that whippings or cannings should be brought back for children who get into trouble.

"I also believe in a little bit of corporal punishment going back to the days of yore, where examples have to be shown," Goodman said.

"I'm dead serious," said Goodman, adding, "Some of these (children) don't learn. You have got to teach them a lesson, and this is coming from a criminal defense lawyer."

"They would get a trial first," he added.

I know the Mayor is going a little over-board with his thumb amputation; but look at it from his perspective, the City of Las Vegas spent over $3 million dollars for the overing up of taging and graffiti in the metro area last year!!

Hey that's a lot of money that the city does NOT have to give to gang type activity. It's NOT art, it's pure and simple defacing of private and public property and against the law and if the vandals are caught they will be given the full punishment under the law of the State of Nevada.......

I wonder how graffiti is around the rest of the world and the U.S. How much are the rest of the cities and towns hurting from graffiti where you live??
 
blooddonor.jpg


Since 1985, the FDA has barred gay men from donating blood.

To be specific, it's not a ban on donations from all gay men — just men who have had sex with another man since 1977.

The policy was the FDA's response to the AIDS crisis of the 1980s (more information), and there's no indication the policy will change any time soon, despite the ongoing need for more donors. Details for blood donor eligibility are described on the Red Cross web site, where the ban on gay men is listed under the HIV/AIDS heading.

The FDA and Red Cross would have you believe that all sexually-active gay men are at severe risk of exposure to HIV — even if you are in a monogamous relationship, practice safe sex, get tested for HIV, and so on — and therefore our blood is no good for them.

Meanwhile, if you're straight and have unsafe sex with a million partners, your blood is pretty much A-OK as long as you and your partner didn't do drugs or exchange money. (Some risky heterosexual behavior gets you temporarily "deferred" from donating, but after only a year you are eligible to donate again.)

The Red Cross web site notes that "every two seconds someone in the United States needs blood." And "only 5% of the eligible population donates blood in any given year." You'd think they'd be in favor of increasing their potential donor base by urging the FDA to rescind its homophobic policy. Yet as recently as 2000, the Red Cross urged the FDA to uphold the ban.

In the past, I use to lie about having rheumatic fever when I was young and could NOT give blood, because I didn't want people to know I was Gay. I suppose I could lie on the eligibility checklist, but I don't want to and shouldn't have to. And I suppose I could urge people not to give blood and thereby support the organization advocating discrimination, but that could prevent an innocent person from receiving the blood he or she needs to survive. But, just imagine how many more people in need would benefit if there was more blood to go around?

What can you do?

If you're the activist type, consider contacting the members of the FDA's Blood Products Advisory Committee — the people who vote to continue the ban on gay male blood donors — and let them know what you think. On a more personal level, if you're solicited for a monetary donation to the Red Cross, you might choose to decline (and send your money to another worthy charity instead).

I know here in Vegas we DO NOT have the Red Cross handling the blood supply, it's a private company doing it....United Blood Services. They however have the same rules to follow as does the Red Cross when it comes from whom to accept blood donations....
 
time.jpg


Have I told you that I hate Daylight Savings Time lately?

No, that's probably because I only mention it twice a year. I think it's crazy and not very helpful. That's my two cents (and I only put in four cents a year on this topic). Does anyone really like DST?

I know as a student (high school) I hated it because we met went to school in the dark in the morning!

Most importantly, don't forget to change your clocks or you'll be late for work Monday morning.

Looks like the U. S. Congress is looking into extending the Daylights Savings Time for the U.S. come November....

Benjamin Franklin conceived of it. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle endorsed it. Winston Churchill campaigned for it. Kaiser Wilhelm first employed it. Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt went to war with it, and the United States fought an energy crisis with it.

For several months every year, daylight saving time (DST) affects well over a billion people throughout the world. Yet most people switch their clocks backward and forward without ever understanding where this revolutionary idea came from or how, throughout its history, DST has led to surprisingly contentious clashes between numerous politicians, scientists, and interest groups in the United States and all across the globe.

Just when we get use to the "new" time vs the "old" time, it's time to change the time again!!! lol
 
jfkerry_sticker.jpg


The origins of April Fool's are pretty fuzzy, though general consensus is that it's somehow tied to the papal implementation in 1582 of the Gregorian calendar, which ran in direct conflict with a handful of wacky Middle Ages notions that the new year and the equinox should run in parallel.

Actually, France's Charles IX had already revived a version of the Julian calendar in 1564. But, as several April Fool's creation myths tell it, French rubes in the countryside refused to believe the new calendar had been implemented, making them the first April fools.

That many other countries didn't adopt the modern calendar until the 18th century complicates it all. That the French refer to the April fool as the "poisson d'Avril" ("April fish") makes things even more puzzling, to say nothing of French kids' fondness for tacking drawings of fish to their classmates' backs. (Surely, there are better ways to mock the French than this. All you lunar calendar fans are probably having a good laugh right now.)

I hope NONE or you have fallen for any stupid jokes and certainly NOT any that got you wet!! LOL
 
200px-Brokeback_mountain.jpg


FINALLY! The DVD for BBM is out and I will rush over to Walmart to get my copy as soon as I can get ready this A.M.!! They have them going for $16+ change and tax and I think that's the cheapest around!! Even though I could care less for WMart, cheap, cheap, cheap! lol

Brokeback Mountain is now the 8th largest grossing movie of its genre (romantic drama) , beating out movies like The Notebook and The English Patient (among others). That’s no small feat, but likely due at least in part to the fact that it only had a budget of $14 million (contrast that with Failure to Launch’s still-somewhat-modest $50 million budget). Other recent Oscar-award winning movies have also had smaller budgets (eg. Capote $7 million and Crash $6.5 million), which definitely backs-up what George Lucas recently said, that “big pics are doomed”. While I don’t believe we’ll never see the likes of Star Wars, Lord of the Rings, or Titanic again, it is encouraging to see Hollywood work more frugally and yet still turn out movies with high critical and popular acclaim.

Speaking of which, you should more certainly spend a few hours with V for Vendetta, a movie that tries hard to appeal to all the various heights of brow currently in existence. Its got violence, tender moments, political theory, satire, hijinks, and a bit of terrorism thrown in to spice it up. Even if people take great offense to its subversive (circa our founding fathers) message, it above all else demonstrates that we live in a country where freedom is respected and lifestyle choice is still exactly that - a choice.

Unlike some places that we’ve supposedly liberated, cough, Afghanistan. Check this great bit about an aid-worker who has been condemned to death for converting from Islam to Christianity. So glad that spreading freedom thing is working out for us. Now if the Islamic heretics don't put a price on his head since Italy has allowed him to come there because of death threats in Afghanistan!! Why didn't they just let him go some where and NOT tell???

Life's truly a mystery!!
 
home_01.jpg

The corporatist Republicans (“amnesty!”) are fighting with the racist Republicans (“fence!”), and it provides an opportunity for progressives to step forward with a clear solution to the immigration problem facing America.

Both the corporatists and the racists are fond of the mantra, “There are some jobs Americans won’t do.” It’s a lie.

Americans will do virtually any job if they’re paid a decent wage. This isn’t about immigration – it’s about economics. Industry and agriculture won’t collapse without illegal labor, but the middle class is being crushed by it.

The reason why thirty years ago United Farm Workers’ Union (UFW) founder Caesar Chávez fought against illegal immigration, and the UFW turned in illegals during his tenure as president, was because Chávez, like progressives since the 1870s, understood the simple reality that labor rises and falls in price as a function of availability.

Working Americans have always known this simple equation: More workers, lower wages. Fewer workers, higher wages.

Progressives fought – and many lost their lives in the battle – to limit the pool of “labor hours” available to the Robber Barons from the 1870s through the 1930s and thus created the modern middle class. They limited labor-hours by pushing for the 50-hour week and the 10-hour day (and then later the 40-hour week and the 8-hour day). They limited labor-hours by pushing for laws against child labor (which competed with adult labor). They limited labor-hours by working for passage of the 1935 Wagner Act that provided for union shops.

And they limited labor-hours by supporting laws that would regulate immigration into the United States to a small enough flow that it wouldn’t dilute the unionized labor pool. “The first laws creating a quota for immigrants were passed in the 1920s, in response to a sense that the country could no longer absorb large numbers of unskilled workers, despite pleas by big business that it wanted the new workers.”

Do a little math. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says there are 7.6 million unemployed Americans right now. Another 1.5 million Americans are no longer counted because they’ve become “long term” or “discouraged” unemployed workers. And although various groups have different ways of measuring it, most agree that at least another five to ten million Americans are either working part-time when they want to work full-time, or are “underemployed,” doing jobs below their level of training, education, or experience. That’s between eight and twenty million un- and under-employed Americans, many unable to find above-poverty-level work.

At the same time, there are between seven and fifteen million working illegal immigrants diluting our labor pool.

If illegal immigrants could no longer work, unions would flourish, the minimum wage would rise, and oligarchic nations to our south would have to confront and fix their corrupt ways.

Meanwhile, the millions of American citizens who came to this nation as legal immigrants, who waited in line for years, who did the hard work to become citizens, are feeling insulted, humiliated, and conned.

Shouldn’t we be compassionate? Of course.

But there is nothing compassionate about driving down the wages of any nation’s middle class. It’s the most cynical, self-serving, greedy, and sociopathic behavior you’ll see from our “conservatives.”

There is nothing compassionate about being the national enabler of a dysfunctional oligarchy like Mexico. An illegal workforce in the U.S. sending an estimated $17 billion to Mexico every year – second only in national income to that country’s oil revenues – supports an antidemocratic, anti-worker, hyperconservative administration there that gleefully ships out of that nation the “troublesome” Mexican citizens – those lowest on the economic food-chain and thus most likely to present “labor unrest” – to the USA. Mexico (and other “sending nations”) need not deal with their own social and economic problems so long as we’re willing to solve them for them – at the expense of our middle class. Democracy in Central and South America be damned – there are profits to be made for Wal-Mart!

Similarly, there is nothing compassionate about handing higher profits (through a larger and thus cheaper work force) to the CEOs of America’s largest corporations and our now-experiencing-record-profits construction and agriculture industries.

What about caring for people in need? Isn’t that the universal religious/ethical value? Of course.

You know perhaps we should just adopt the same immigration policies that Mexico currently has on the books....they DO NOT allow unlimited immigration into Mexico from ANY country and if you are found illegally in mexico you will first be arrested and then deported!

NO! I am NOT insensitive to the many great Mexican people we have in the U.S. and all the other great nations of the world either; but ANY country cannot absorb an unlimited amount of people into their economy and be able to survive........it's just NOT sound government!

So watch this week as the U.S. sees the many, many people out on the streets marching with their signs to cause the Congress of the U.S. to adopt an immigration plan that will enable ALL of them to legally become citizens of the U.S.; but WHY must we do that when most of them came here illegally, while those who waited their turns and became "LEGAL" citizens the old-fashioned way are snubbed???

The whole world is watching!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top