Double-spacing after periods? **OH, THE HUMANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!**
I think it's more an age thing. I learned to type on big chunky IBM typewriters around the same era as Lex. I still need a certain button feel to a keyboard, and hate the flat, textureless feel of a laptop keyboard.
I learned to type on a Royal manual typewriter which I think was from the 1920's - it was certainly
quite old already when I first started playing with it around 1963 or 1964. I REALLY miss the very steep "elevation" of the old manual keyboards - that separated the keys so much that adjacent-rows typos (nowadays EXTREMELY common for me) were pretty much unknown.
I learned to type on a manual Royal that needed at least 3lb of pressure on each key! And, yet, my typing speed still managed to jamb it up!
Then came the IBM "Selectric" (ball) typewriters. And, I was Finally able to type "at Speed", with NO problems!
The current Keyboards are FAR above those Old IBMs!
Yet ... I shall Forever "Double Space" after periods! It's just an automatic, engrained, thing. For those who don't like it? Blow Me!
Actually, I liked the IBM Selectric enough that I was very happy to pay a premium price (about $160) for a very old [1990s maybe 1980s] IBM computer keyboard, not at all unlike the old Selectric ones, and I use it on my desktop. Instead of the "membrane" keyboards which are so common now, the IBM keyboard actually has metal springs inside every key, and when you type it makes the spring touch the side of the "keywell" (well, that's what I call it) which completes an electrical circuit and types the letter. The mechanical principle - I just LOVE the name of it - is called "catastrophic buckling" in the industry. Wow...sounds like a huge bridge collapsing or something, LOL.
My fastest typing speed, ever, in my lifetime, was on old manual typewriters. Probably because I learned typing on those, my tendency has always been to "pound" more on a keyboard than normal; the "pounding" is enough that phantom characters adjacent to the typed key often appear, or I'm brushing against adjacent keys. "trhan" for "than" is one of my extremely common typos; "ordfer" for "order" is another one that happens wioth me a LOT. (And "wioth" for "with" is common, too...) In general, a lot of "th" combinations become "trh" when I'm typing.
When I was using manual typewriters, I seldom jammed the keys. For me, typos on old manuals were perhaps 500 times as rare as they are for me on computer keyboards. Of course, a typo on a manual typewriter was much harder to correct, and of course it was pretty much impossible to *insert* forgotten words or such things.
I'm still not sure whether I'm brushing adjacents, or whether I'm striking the key hard enough that it "pulls down" the keyboard membrane resulting in the extra letter. If it was actually possible to have an old manual typewriter which could type data into a computer, and which could
easily/always be repaired, I would spend a ton of $$ for it. Electric typewriters eventually ran into the same repair problems, as well, by 2005 or so.
Breakdowns, and the resulting
impossibility of getting anything repaired, made manual typewriters nonviable before the end of our previous Century. Of course, if a computer keyboard breaks down, it's the easiest thing in the world to just go out and get another keyboard, and plug-'er-in, just like that, and it's good to go.
I shall forever double space after periods, too - in the same way, I was taught that way. It emphasizes the "full stop" after the period, and to my eyes a single space kind of "runs together" more trhan I like. (trhan - there's that typo I mentioned above...)
So, I really DO NOT have an issue with you double spacing after periods, KY. Does that mean that I can't blow you? Darn.
