The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Confess something that might surprise others or damage your reputation on JUB - 2014

Wow again. And you base that on the fact that I made a tongue-in-the-cheek comment on the gayness of noticing the similarity between evening wear worn by celebrities and the people photographing them as well as a comment on not putting people in boxes based on their sexual preferences?


Ok.

Sorry I did not see your comment on that thread. I was talking about the OP's opinion.
 
a tongue-in-the-cheek comment on the gayness of noticing the similarity between evening wear worn by celebrities and the people photographing them

I guess that was pretty 'gay' just talking about fashion. The irony is actually most gay guys like most other people have no idea or care about the disparity between men's and women's fashion, the whole 'chauvinistic' issue belamo brought up. They are interested and even understand womenswear more than menswear. Like Tom Ford who supposedly created wonders for Gucci's womenswear but all he creates for menswear are suits - till today. George Kotsiopoulos on Fashion Police has no idea about menswear, instead of complimenting male celebs for trying something different he's always criticizing whenever they do that :##:
 
I saw My Neighbor Totoro tonight.

mnt_bus3.jpg


Where's the surprise? It was my first viewing of it. Or of any Miyazaki film.

Lex
 
You represent the majority of sheep out there due to whom that commercial uptake of new male fashion cannot happen.

Sheep will take whatever they are fed...the problem is not the takers, but the right feeders able to bring about the change.
 
Since today it is all about just selling as much as they can, nobody will take the risk of being creative and end up being as accomodating as they can. See how the CH, RL, all the typical American design cater to the taste and habits of rich American yokels who pass from prep to prep generation the exact same yokel taste and lack of sense of fashion that traces back to their first pennyless yokel.

Hell, they do not even care about quality even in craftmanship... remember when Tom Ford took over YSL?
 
I'd rather say "gross" (even if you are not an over-25 old fart), but we accept "random".

It is indeed random as I don't hold any particular attraction towards him (at least that I consciously know of). So no problem with the word "random." "Gross" is another subjective quality that has no bearing on whether the dream was random or not.
 
It is indeed random as I don't hold any particular attraction towards him (at least that I consciously know of). So no problem with the word "random." "Gross" is another subjective quality that has no bearing on whether the dream was random or not.
Ah! consciousness! awareness!! :mrgreen:

"Gross" is because of Liam :roll: :cool:
 
I take it, belamo, that Liam has been cut from your exclusive porn collection?

I had to look up that name... (I only remember that Harry because I remember him repeatedly appearing on The Sun because of his female hofriends...).
And I don't do child porn... in fact, whenever I considered hiring an athletic, well-proportioned twink with real buttocks, I ended up thinking how much juicier are the big beefy, smooth blond ho, or peach-skinned musclehos also listed on gayromeo, either visiting or commonly serving my area.
 
Yes, Liam may be "gross"...but again, it has no bearing with whether the dream was "random" or not.

Well if you thought he was the opposite of gross, then having a sex dream about him wouldn't be so random, right?
 
Well if you thought he was the opposite of gross, then having a sex dream about him wouldn't be so random, right?

I don't think he's the opposite of gross. He's "meh" to me and I never thought of him sexually, so it that vein, it was random, IMO.

Maybe it should be "gross" in addition to "random." Not "gross" instead of "random."
 
I had to write a short story for a writers workshop about a telephone conversation. It had to be in two parts. One part was the call, the other was a secondary characters reaction to the call. The feedback I received was "you have a knack for depicting psychos" and apparently those who read it found it both creepy and as a useful reminder to lock their doors. The emotion I picked was happiness :lol:
 
I had to write a short story for a writers workshop about a telephone conversation. It had to be in two parts. One part was the call, the other was a secondary characters reaction to the call. The feedback I received was "you have a knack for depicting psychos" and apparently those who read it found it both creepy and as a useful reminder to lock their doors. The emotion I picked was happiness :lol:

Given your TV watching and amateur sleuthing history, I can't say I'm surprised. ;)
 
I have a real bone to pick with the JUBber who talked that troll out of his self-imposed exile into his own little hole.
 
I'll go one step further - I had a sex dream about a JUBber last night. Perhaps even stranger, the sex part of the dream had us naked and making out for awhile...and then we decided to do something non-sex related. That said, he was a good kisser. :)

Lex
 
Back
Top