The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

DAMON AND HUNTER: Banned in Australia

TonyComstock

On the Prowl
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Posts
113
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
New York
Website
www.comstockfilms.com
I had been making posts ballyhooing the success of DAMON AND HUNTER: DOING IT TOGETHER to the Young Men, Twinks, Jocks & Hunks forum, but since this post is more about politics than porn, I thought this would be a more appropriate venue.

DAMON AND HUNTER: DOING IT TOGETHER has been having tremendous success in Australia. It's been covered in a number of magazines and newspapers, including DNA, The Melbourne Star, B-News, MCV, and QMagazine.

In July it played to an overflow audience at the Melbourne Underground Film Festival, and went on to be named Best Documentary at the fest. From there we were invited to show the film at QueerDOC, the world's premiere gay and lesbian documentary film festival, in Sydney this September.

Well the Australian Office of Film and Literature Classification just dropped the hammer on DAMON AND HUNTER.

This past week QueerDOC received a letter notifying them that screening D&H would be a violation of Section 8 of the 2004 Film Festival Guidelines. That's right, in Australia the government can tell you what you can and can't show at a film festival.

What will happen now, I don't know. The festival has already distributed nearly 50,000 copies of the program, including two screenings of DAMON AND HUNTER. We've already printed up hundreds of posters and flyers and made arrangements to have them distributed throughout Sydney. The festival is currently in negotiations with the OFLC to see if they can show DAMON AND HUNTER in some sort of edited form, and we're trying to make an appeal of the ratings. (Winterbottom's 9 SONGS, a film that featured extremely explicit footage of straight sex received a reduced rating from the OFLC. But without the major distributor backing of a film like 9 SONGS I'm doubtful our appeal will be successful.) If I were a betting man, I'd bet that Sydney is not going to get the chance to see the film that Melbourne enjoyed so very much.

Of all the films the OFLC might target for censorship, DAMON AND HUNTER seems like a particular inappropriate target. Aside from the recognition the film has so far received as an outstanding work of cinema, it's also been recognized for it's value as a life-affirming and educational document. DAMON AND HUNTER is held in the Kinsey Library at the world renowned Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana. It's already being used by the Gay Men's Health Crisis in New York, and by the San Francisco Sex Information Hotline. Just this week it's been being passed around by deligates at the 16th Annual HIV/AIDS Conference in Toronto Cananda. Why? Because DAMON AND HUNTER is singular in it's compassionate, humane, frank, and erotic depiction of gay love and gay sex. And apparently that's something that the government of Australia needs to keep the people of Sydney, especially the gay men of Sydney, from seeing.

I wish I could ask people to do something, but there's really nothing to do except sit and wait and see how it turns out. In the mean time, thanks for letting me blow off some steam!

-TC
 
Poster for the QueerDOC screenings

DH-PosterQD.jpg
 
Tony,

I'm sorry to hear that the Office of Film & Literature Classification have blocked the screening of your film in Sydney.

You really do need a good gay legal firm to handle the appeal, and I wonder if you have retained anyone. Don't try to go it alone.

Also have you contacted the media? I think the Film and Arts writers at the Sydney newspapers might be interested in your story.

Also, you MUST contact Margaret Pomeranz and David Stratton, who are Australia's film critic luminaries, and present a weekly show on ABC Television nationwide. They not only review and discuss commercial (Hollywood) movies, but amateur and independent productions, too. They always make time to talk about Film Festivals and alternative film. Both Margaret and David have a Film Festival/Alternative background, and I believe you would have a couple of allies here. David actually ran the Sydney Film Festival for some time (He was their director from 1966 to 1983), and as well as his TV show, he is a Lecturer in Film at the University of Sydney. Well worth contacting.
 
Oh please.

DAMON AND HUNTER is a hardcore porn movie.

It's not an "Eductional" film, and it's not a documentary.

It's a hardcore film that features two guys having sex intercut with them gushing about their shared love of Tori Amos.

Get over yourself, dude... (and this is coming from ME.. the guy who practically INVENTED narcissism.)


(oh, and I think I deserve points for not making a big deal about what a couple of fembots with bad hair they are. oh.. wait...)
 
They wouldn't allow a movie called Judy and Brian Doing It Together to be screened her publicly either. It's not an anti gay thing...

And how is Damon and Hunter any more educational than ummm Dawsons 50 Load weekend...
 
I should point out that I'm not Anti-porn, and although I'm not a fan of Tony's work, I support his right to make it.

That being said... showing a hardcore movie at a government funded film festival and pretending that it's not a hardcore porn movie is bold to say the least.

Claiming that it's "Censorship" when your movie gets yanked because it is what it is is just silly.

As much as I'd love to see one of the Fratmen movies on a big screen, I'd be a bit insulted if people weren't all wanking off by the half-way mark. And that's only going to be allowed in the kind of theater that doesn't get government grants.
 
Oh my god, that isn't film...................THAT'S PORN. It has no place as a governmnt sponsored film festival. If you go to a Porn festival I'm sure you won't have any problems. Come on how do you expect any support, look at the promotion on your site, "BUY THE MOVIE AND GET A FREE BOTTLE OF LUBE"...... LoL come on man, try to be a little serious here.
 
They wouldn't allow a movie called Judy and Brian Doing It Together to be screened her publicly either. It's not an anti gay thing...

I'd hate to think it is, but against the fact the OFLC gave 9 SONGS an R-rating, one has to wonder.

And how is Damon and Hunter any more educational than ummm Dawsons 50 Load weekend...
[/quote]

Not being a health professional, I couldn't say. You might ask Bill Stackhouse, director of the Institute for Gay Men's Health at GMHC, or Thomas Roche of the San Francisco Sex Information Hotline. Both made unsolicited requests for copies to be used in the education and outreach efforts.
 
^ can you prove your credentials? its very easy for us to come on here at start claiming things like that.

Ms. Wilmot is indeed our Australian representative. She shepherded D&H into the Melbourne Underground Film Festival where it ultimately was named Best Documentary, and has been our liaison to the OFLC through the ratings and appeals process.
 
We also need to point out that the movie isn't "BANNED IN AUSTRALIA".

It's just not being allowed public performance at a film festival. You an still do what you're supposed to do with porn... buy a copy at the store and watch it on DVD at home with someone you love.

Tony, even you said that no American Film Festival would allow it to be shown and I dont' remember seeing you claiming it had been "BANNED IN AMERICA".

I'm also sure that if you put it in an American or Austrlian porn film festival (if there is such a thing) that you'll get standing ovations and 5-Star reviews.
 
So what EXACTLY is this film about.. is it a hard core porno.. or something else. Are there any clips on line of it?

People seem to have a hard time finding a name or catagory for DAMON AND HUNTER, as well as our other film. This "what exactly is this film?" theme keeps coming up in reviews. If you're curious, you can go to our website and read reviews. Ultimately the only way to really know what a film is is to see it.

Neverminding opinions about what the film is and isn't, the facts are that when they saw a copy Melbourne Underground Film Festival invited us to show the film. When QueerDOC, the world's premiere gay and lesbian documentry venue saw the DVD, they invited us to show the film there as well. In fact, if you have a look at the post you'll see they booked it for two sessions.

An important distinction between the film's status in the US verses its status in Australia is that here in the US there is no law or government entity that can say the film cannot be screened in a theater. In fact, the film will be screened at a film festival this October here in New York, and several other US festival have made inquiries as to the film's availablity. Obviously this is not the case in Austalia.
 
We've re-cut DAMON AND HUNTER: DOING IT TOGETHER as specificed by the Australian Office of Film and LIterature Classification, and we are offering the censored for free online viewing.

For those of you on the podcast trip, you can subscribe to the Comstock Films Video Podcast here:

feed://feeds.feedburner.com/ComstockFilmsVideoPodcast

If you're not down with podcasts and you need a direct link to the media file, it's here:

http://media-c02m02.libsyn.com/a3dteJp2nHvJeJZ7bHVqqpqoZXSY/podcasts/comstockfilms/OFLC.mov
 
comstock is an industry leader IMO because they show that really hot and moving sex between two people in love is far more erotic than paying a straight boy to jack off for a camera.

They do us all a service by showing the world that two men can make love, not just have it off in front of a camera for fifty bucks and a hit on the crack pipe.

I see why the films are classified as pornography, because, well... they do have graphic sexual content.

but but but

you simply cant compare what they do with some of these other hack and mash porn companies

BRAVO TONY!! :=D: :=D: :=D: :=D: :=D:
 
Ok but none the less this is a PORNO, its a "sex flick". The only difference between it, and the hundreds or thousands of video's here oin the "Boy's Club" is that the 2 people involved are actually dating eachother. Thats it! Other then the fact that they're not "gay for pay", its just two guys, who happen to be dating, having sex with eachtoher. It's in no way a film or movie to be shown at any other kind of festival then an "adult festival".
 
ahhh

i just don't know

I think that the content is a concern, but I also think that Comstock is just a different kind of thing.

they dont just do gay video either.

they do straight couples in committed relationships having sex as well and they film with real film, not digital or video. that process sends the quality of their features miles higher than these fly by night porn sites that push straight men on us like processed cheese. You have to do that the real way.

we aren't talking about a computer nerd in a booth splicing files together, we are talking about the real deal art of film making.

We always say that gay men are never depicted in romanticly sexual lights, yet we have a tendency to bash people that actually make the attempt.

the content is definitely adult only, but I think it tries its best to show graphic sexuality in an artistic way.

people responded just this way to Mapplethorpe, I may remind everyone. He was showing graphic sex acts in high quality process and the far right slammed him for it. why would a quality motion picture of two men in a committed relationship making love be any less?

I get a vibe that this is about the premise of romance being associated with sex. If thats the case...

well it would be disapointing.
 
It's in no way a film or movie to be shown at any other kind of festival then an "adult festival".

It seems to me that what sort of film should or should not be screened at a festival should be up to the festival; not you, and certainly not the government. I know, it's a radical idea – right up there with adults being able to decide with whom and how they want to have sex. Crazy talk!
 
Nobody is telling people with whom or how they can have sex..

But they ARE telling them where they CAN'T do it.

You know.. in line at the bank.. tennis courts... movie theaters...
 
Back
Top