The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

depression

  • Thread starter Thread starter sexyflipboi69
  • Start date Start date
I find ludolfo's post disturbing. That anyone would try to convince others depression doesn't exist is dangerous. Depression is a very real, serious, and potentially fatal disease.

of course what i say is disturbing, cause its awake-up call exposing what is accepted. bascially a MAJOR con which provides the pharmaceutical industry with endless increasing profits.

Look, we are NOT saying that people do not feel distressed in ever deepening ways. Some genrally, and some where sadmness takes them over completely. What i Am saying is that to then call that FEELING a disease is NOT PROVEN. and if it is not proven then what the hell are they telling you you must take toxic drugs and have damaging ECT for?...also lobotomies and godknows what.

I cannot believe that the gay people here, not many, see through this evil scam, considering that not SO long ago the same psychiatric establishment also pathologized homosexuality, and 'prescribed' all forms of harmful 'medications' and surgical procesdures, and experiments, and MISinformation, that DESTROYED peoples lives. Yet here you'll are, forgetting THAT squalid bit of psychiatric history, and imagining that these people, now, have ones best interests at heart.
 
So...that antidepressants control my depression and no longer make me think about suicide is what? A placebo effect?
 
So...that antidepressants control my depression and no longer make me think about suicide is what? A placebo effect?

yes! of course they effect chemistry of the nervous system, but this doesn't mean depression is a disease.
some people may have a glass of wine with their meal and find not only do they eat better, but also feel jovial. the wine is effecting their nervous system. this does NOT mean that eating a meal and not enjoying it, and feeling merry, is a disease.
 
Your definition of "disease" is a disorder caused by a pathogen or with a known etiology.

My definition of "disease" is an abnormality of the body or mind that causes discomfort, dysfunction, distress, or death to the person afflicted.

BTW, a placebo is a medicine or preparation which has no inherent pertinent pharmacologic activity but which is effective only by virtue of the factor of suggestion attendant upon its administration. Antidepressants have a known effect, increasing levels of neurotransmitters in the brain. Thus, they are not placebos.

After reading your posts I've come to the conclusion that you truly don't understand depression. You may have felt a little down on occasion, as everyone does. You clearly have never felt the overwhelming sadness, hopelessness, worthlessness, meaninglessness and apathy that are clinical depression. You clearly have never felt the continuation of your life to be intolerable.

Depression is a real condition, whether we call it a disease or not is irrelevant. Medications and therapies are extremely effective in treating this condition.
 
Oh Andrew----:-) you know, theres no WAY i is gonna fall out with ya. but seriously , dont pretend to know me. you really dont. i have been to such dark places you MAYB wouldn't believe....i toked for 30 odd years nearly everyday. i sooner tyhat than them shrink drugs. i cant pretend to like what they stand for. i kreep spelling out what they laid on gay men in the past. not ONE challenger to what i have said so far has took me up on this HISTORY which i find strange. but its true. these shrinks with their phony medicine made out being gay was mental disease. whats that tell you......??

what if some doctor suddenly said cancer aint a disease no more? is that feasable? NO, it dont make sense, and thats caused THAt disease and its aetiology is real, whilst the stuff bout 'depression' and 'attention disorder' etc etc etc is SUBJECTIVE...

these drugs they givre aren't REALLy 'anti-depressant' as tho there is A disease called 'depression' and they are anti-biotics. this pseudoshit has been explained in depth by many people who expose this sham scam, including Szasz and Dr Fred Baughman.

these shrinks dont use 'disease' as a metaphor they are using it in the same way medicine uses the term to describe organic disease.
 
Ludolfo, I have not seen anyone here deny psychiatry's historical apprach to homosexuality. This is not something ignored or hushed by doctors either, here one of the worlds premier peer reviewed medical journals looks at the issue from two perspectives:

Treatments of homosexuality in Britain since the 1950s—an oral history: the experience of professionals

Treatments of homosexuality in Britain since the 1950s—an oral history: the experience of patients

I dont deny that this happened and that the doctors involved were grossly misguided in their beliefs abou this "illness" and its treatment.

I fail to see any link with depression. The vast majority of patients being treated for depression do so willingly. The only time involuntary orders are commonly written for these patients is when a number of doctors believe that the patient is at imminent risk of serious self harm, and in Australia such an order only allows for the involuntary holding of a patient on a secure ward and does not allow for involuntary treatment of any kind.

You claim that "these drugs they givre aren't REALLy 'anti-depressant' as tho there is A disease called 'depression' and they are anti-biotics". If I understand correctly you suggest that if an illness isn't unifactorial in aetiology with a direct treatment for that single cause then its not a disease. You know theres a reason it takes over ten years to be a qualified specialist. Diseases are complicated and have many causes and many effects in the body, we know some of these factors in depression and we know that modulating CNS chemistry corrects to a large extent the patterns seen in depression.

Involuntary ECT is almost unheard of in modern practice. The overwhelming majority of patients receiving ECT do so willingly and are greatly appreciative of its effects. These patients are under general anaesthesia and induced paralysis throughout the procedure so that we need to use EEG's to even know they have reached seizure threshold in most cases. There in nothing remotely barbarous or torturaous about ECT, it is a very effective widely used treatment for drug resistant Major Depressive Illness. I performed 9 GA's for ECT yesterday morning before 10 am and all 9 patients walked out of post op by 1 am with no untoward effects aside from significant depressive symptom relief.

So please ludolfo before you keep spewing generilazations please show us some actual experience or peer reviewed evidence for your claims, they're dangerous ill informed and tiresome.
 
So please ludolfo before you keep spewing generilazations please show us some actual experience or peer reviewed evidence for your claims, they're dangerous ill informed and tiresome.

I can't agree more. Tiresome.
 
What I am trying to communicate, convey, is.......for you to be always aware of the larger picture. the whole of it, the gestalt. whats behind the scenes as much is whats on it, etc. And when one looks at the history of the psychiatric movement it all becomes terribly clearer. One can see what is agoin on, who is beling labelled, what people, what class of people, what has been used through the ages to 'cure' 'madness' and later 'mental illness. I advise STRONGLY ANYone following this thread to not believe me nor the pro bio-psychiatric enthusiastys, but to find out for yourselves and a really really great book for doing this is a book titled The Manufacture of Madness: A Comparative Study of the Inquisition and the Mental Health Movement, by Thomas Szasz

See when you look at the story of homosexuality, as seen through the dark prism of psychiatry, this is a great clue to how these shrinks operate. How they pretend their subjectivity is a science, and how capricious this 'science' is when it 'goes out of fashion'. Does CANCER--a real disease-- go out of fashion. can a diagnosis of cancer suddenly become unfashionable or politically incorrect. And then the same ones who do so carry on 'business as usual'??---surely gay people here, with all your savvy and living-on-the-edgness of the 'accepted' tradition can see through this scam:eek:

These shrinks are continuuing to expand their relentelss power. Their tentacles now shoot out into all areas of our institutions in various different guises and names. Its invaded the schools. NOW all of a sudden, MILLIONS of children have suddenly become 'mentally ill'!! YES, research this for yourselves. Resrearch the growth rate of so-called 'ADD' and 'ADHD'.

NOW if a kid dont fit in school. yeah school whose main aim it is to DUMB YOU DOWN and destroy your spirit. If the kid dont fit in, hey presto they are diagnosed dis-ordered, given stigmatizing labels like ADHD and DRUGGED with toxic chemicals.

I am on Dr Fred Baughman's mailing list, and have been for several years, and i have witness real really sad letters from parents who have lost their children, to the State for refusing to have them drugged , AND lost them as in their children have died due to the toxic effects of the drugs, and combinations of the drugs given to them by bio-psychiatrists!

Yes, the same establishment that proclaims it knows what correct chemical balance is, and how to cure depression.
 
After reading your posts I've come to the conclusion that you truly don't understand depression. You may have felt a little down on occasion, as everyone does. You clearly have never felt the overwhelming sadness, hopelessness, worthlessness, meaninglessness and apathy that are clinical depression. You clearly have never felt the continuation of your life to be intolerable.

Depression is a real condition, whether we call it a disease or not is irrelevant. Medications and therapies are extremely effective in treating this condition.
I can't speak for the person you posted this to but I am well acquainted with depression, in myself and several members of my family, and also some friends. I've seen people use different ways of dealing with it.

And I think that to an alarming degree Americans have, as in other circumstances, been convinced that pharmaceutical drugs are the answer. For some people in some circumstances, anti-depressants can be useful but IMO they are WAY over-prescribed and used. Big pharma is pushing that stuff more aggressively than any other drug. Not that that's surprising, given the dreadful way depression feels and how long it sometimes drags out. Anybody who's been through it wants it to end as easily and quickly as possible. A pill is an easy thing to take. Depression is a very hard thing to deal with and get past -- it takes a lot of effort and, often, a long time. So people dealing with depression are an easy mark for a pill being the answer. But a pill will not fix depression any more than a pain-killer will fix an infection.

Pain-killers can be useful and anti-depressants can be useful, but they're both over-used -- and too often misleads a person into believing a problem has been dealt with when in truth only a symptom has been. When I get a headache it's easy to reach for a Tylenol but I have a headache for a reason and if I deal with the reason (stress, deyhdration, hunger, too little sleep, etc) the headache goes away (but doesn't make any profit for the Tylenol folks).

Americans are too eager to be distanced from their own bodies today. When we're in pain, our body is telling us something -- and it's not to take a pill. I believe the same is true of depression. I've gone through some staggeringly painful periods of depression and every single time I've learned something important that I needed to take care of. As dastardly as depression is, I view it as a very challenging opportunity to figure out stuff that I'm resisting. I view the excessive pill-popping approach to depression as an easy out (that often is not easy in that there are undesirable side-effects and for many people elements of depression lingers anyway) for both doctors and patients, egged on by the pharm industry that's getting obscenely rich off it.

In short, I believe there are real reasons for depression (and I think the tendency for depression as a response mechanism runs in families) and that the brain chemical imbalances are a result of the issues that bring on depression rather than a cause of it. Learning how to navigate the difficult transitions of our lives, how to confront and manage grief and loss and disappointment and hurt are very important elements of the maturation process, which gives us vital tools for the twists and turns of life and for helping those younger and less experienced. That's where wisdom comes from, not from taking pills. Who's going to be the wise elders of a society that used pills to alter the chemicals of our minds rather than learn the lessons that come from figuring out how to solve our biggest problems, how to prevail over adversity?
 
I agree, Nick. Anti-depressants merely treat the symptoms. However, every doctor I've been to has been extremely insistent upon seeking counseling or therapy for that very reason. Anti-depressants are not a cure.

Healing takes time and work, but an effective medicine can allieviate the suffering of the patient much more quickly.

Ludolfo, I'm done with you. You sound like a conspiracy theorist and are too caught up in the history of psychiatry, while offering nothing useful or helpful. I shudder to think that anyone depressed should read your posts and take them to heart. You know the message you're conveying? "Your feelings aren't real, there is no hope, the professionals won't be able to help you, you might as well off yourself this moment."

Think carefully before spouting off.
 
I agree, Nick. Anti-depressants merely treat the symptoms. However, every doctor I've been to has been extremely insistent upon seeking counseling or therapy for that very reason. Anti-depressants are not a cure.

Healing takes time and work, but an effective medicine can allieviate the suffering of the patient much more quickly.

Ludolfo, I'm done with you. You sound like a conspiracy theorist and are too caught up in the history of psychiatry, while offering nothing useful or helpful. I shudder to think that anyone depressed should read your posts and take them to heart. You know the message you're conveying? "Your feelings aren't real, there is no hope, the professionals won't be able to help you, you might as well off yourself this moment."

Think carefully before spouting off.

and your ARE ??:rolleyes:

looky here. I have as much right to free speech as you have --backin up toxic drugs. something i really feel passionately about cause that craps got our KIDS by the short and curlies now!! that evil is pervasive.

another thing. before you cast aspersions learn to LISTEN. if you even bothered to have followed what i am saying, i eariler said it IS up to the person whether they CHOOSE to take so-called medication, bt to be INFORMED, not UNiformed. being uniformed is believing what they have is a biological disease. And--listen! there is NO proof existing this is the case!
 
I agree, Nick. Anti-depressants merely treat the symptoms. However, every doctor I've been to has been extremely insistent upon seeking counseling or therapy for that very reason. Anti-depressants are not a cure.
I'm glad you've had that experience and understanding but oftentimes that is not the case. Many doctors prescribe anti-depressants and as far as the patient understands that's the fix to their problem. But depression is a lot more complicated than a chemical reaction in the brain. And I believe that the chemical malfuction is a result, not the cause, of something having gone wrong that needs to be addressed -- and way too often is not.

The idea that "clinical" depression is a "disease," the brain is misfiring and a drug will correct that and therefore alleviate depression, is neat and tidy but it's also misleading. The words being used and the implications made are misleading people into thinking they're getting rid of the problem when in reality they're only getting rid of the symptom.

And giving anti-depressants to children and adolescents is, in my opinion, just flat-out irresponsible. Childhood and adolescence is our most intense period of learning how to respond effectively to both our Selves and the outside world. Using a drug to alter our mood response during that time strikes me as, ultimately, a crippler. We're letting the pharma industry convince us to drug our children rather than putting in the time and effort needed to properly socialize our children. Put away the pills, put away the video games and tv and computers and ipods and gameboys and all the rest -- spend TIME with children and teach them how to deal with feelings of disappointment, anger, hurt, fear of rejection and abandonment. Pills give them no TOOLS for dealing with life, just as those same pills give depressed adults no tools for dealing with the problems that lead us into and get us stuck in depression.

I having nothing against the use of anti-depressants. I'm sure they can be useful in at least relieving some stress while one is working to figure out the real problem and a resolution to it. But they are WAY too easily and carelessly prescribed, just as sleeping pills are today, and the marketing strategy by the pharma industry is cynical and has nothing at all to do with the best interests of people suffering from depression.

Healing takes time and work, but an effective medicine can allieviate the suffering of the patient much more quickly.
I'm not sure that's true. It can alleviate a certain depth of suffering but most people who suffer from depression do not experience an end to that suffering by taking medication. With due respect, your characterization sounds like a result of believing the marketing by pharmeceudical companies. Don't believe marketing schemes, especially by corporations that rely on people who believe their marketing to make them obscenely wealthy -- they are inherently dishonest.

Ludolfo, I'm done with you. You sound like a conspiracy theorist and are too caught up in the history of psychiatry, while offering nothing useful or helpful.
He has offered thoughtful and in-depth posts that deserve respectful consideration. I think your dismissing his contribution as "offering nothing useful or helpful" is unkind and, in fact, cruel. Especially in a thread about depression. It's clear he's dealt with depression himself, as have I and as have you. We're on the same side.

I shudder to think that anyone depressed should read your posts and take them to heart. You know the message you're conveying? "Your feelings aren't real, there is no hope, the professionals won't be able to help you, you might as well off yourself this moment."
That's not what he's posted here. Not at all. He's encouraged people to inform themselves. There's nothing frightening or wrong in that.

And, for the record, he's right about the history of psychiatry, therapy in general, and homosexuality. And depression as well. Read about it, it's stunning. And I'm not talking ancient history. My own experience, when I was 16, my parents sent me to a therapist to help me deal with my depression. A very nice man, gentle nature and good looking and kindly, we connected instantly and that felt wonderful and safe. When, after a few sessions, I revealed my feelings for men, our relationship changed immediately and not only was he of no help but he damaged my ability to confront and deal with my homosexuality. I went running back into the closet and stayed there for five years (despite sleeping with a few guys and feeling suicidal about it). Dr. Gates was not a mean man but his professional response to me, my concerns and my depression were harmful. That's not to say all professionals are that way, but some are and we have to be careful -- and INFORMED. We have to take responsibility for our own bodies, our own minds, our own functioning and malfunctioning selves.

I think the poster you dismiss as having nothing useful to offer on this subject is spot-on in the way he's questioned, informed himself, and has the courage to speak out in opposition to a multi-million dollar marketing campaign.
 
Unfortunately, I've been away for a while and sick so addressing all of the posts is not going to happen right now.


As to the Ludolfo's comments about Native Americans and bored children, it is quite obvious from those examples that he doesn't understand that there are strict criteria for depression (and ADHD) that would preclude Native Americans who just suffered terrible losses from being categorized as depressed right away. Psychiatry takes that all into account.

As stated here, medications alone are not the answer. Therapy is an integral part of the treatment of depression. But the meds DO help most people (just like tylenol helps a fever but doesn't necesarrily treat the cause).

As to homosexuality.... yeah, they were wrong about that. And after years of studies, they realized that it was immutable and not a disease. Who said it was a perfect science? But depression has been around just as long if not longer with far more people affected. They've had far more studies on it (good, scientifically sound studies) that have shown it to be a disorder and that the meds help.

There are many things in medicine and life that are subjective and unmeasurable. But to say that it means they don't exist is ridiculous. If you believe that, go hit your finger with a nail and say that the pain doesn't exist. Of course it does, but only the afflicted feels it and there is no good measure. It's subjective to an extent... but pain meds still help with it, even though they don't "cure" the main cause. But are you going to say that pain isn't real and is a big conspiracy by the drug companies? I'd hope not.

Look, there are people out there that believe anything. And there are people out there that believe that everybody is conspiring to get them (another psychological illness... but let's not go there). My advice to those on the fence in this issue is two fold. One, if you're depressed, go talk to your doctor. And two, go look at the hard evidence and you'll see that there are lots of studies on the SSRI's and on depression. VERY VERY VERY VERY few articles (and no studies that I've seen, or have been posted) say that it is a conspiracy.

And lastly, watch the personal attacks.... they're not to where I'll delete posts yet, but close (and that's on both sides of the arguement).
 
Studies that test effectiveness of antidepressants used by people with depression have been limited up to now.

A study published just last month in the American Journal of Psychiatry, which measured the effectiveness of antidepressants using multiple treatment attempts when one or another medication didn't work, is the most comprehensive so far and the results are noteworthy.

The article itself is very long and requires a subscription to open online, but MSNBC reported on it so I'll link to their article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15503920/

Salient points:

The project started out with 3,671 adults diagnosed with major depression. Half of them had a family history of it, and more than half had suffered multiple bouts of it themselves.

All were started on Celexa, made by Forest Laboratories and one of a widely used class of drugs called SSRIs. Nearly 37 percent had their depression go into remission after this first try. The rest switched to another antidepressant or continued with Celexa and added a second treatment. This second step helped 31 percent of that group.

The third and fourth attempts brought success rates of 14 percent and 13 percent, respectively. When all results from these various groups of participants were looked at collectively, 67 percent of the total group had been helped by one or more drugs.

However, 40 percent of those who achieved remission on their first drug relapsed within a year. That rose to 55 percent of those who took two tries to succeed and 65 percent and 70 percent of those requiring three and four tries, respectively.

Medication can be helpful and should be considered in treatment of depression. But I have seen so many people disappointed because their expectations were inflated through pharmaceutical ads or doctors or laypeople who misrepresent the true effect of antidepressants.

And that's not even taking into account the side effects, which can continue long term and be depressing in themselves. Some of these include Urinary retention, Blurred vision, Constipation, Sedation, Sleep disruption, Weight gain, Headache, Nausea, Gastrointestinal disturbance/diarrhea, Abdominal pain, Inability to achieve an erection, Inability to achieve an orgasm, Loss of libido, Agitation, Anxiety, etc.

Depression is treatable. But drugs do not usually help depression the way aspirin helps a headache. It's more complicated than that.​

Drug companies are in the business of making profits. In fact the pharmaceutical industry is the most profitable industry in the world. That's not by accident. Their marketing, to the public and to the health care industry, is with profits in mind, not dispensing helpful information. That's not a conspiracy theory, it's just the truth.​
 
Back
Top