Do str8 repubs come here just to post?

[chance1]

^ I wish HuntNeo or LostLover was moderating in here. I could see you being a beneficial member of the staff team would just love it.

And you're right about str8 guys giving lousy head.

yeah that would grand

misogyny
age-ism
and references to individuals appearances

would be the standard

man you just jumped the shark AGAIN !!

 

[JayQueer]

And then we have one who keeps expressing a wish to be nothing more than a Republican housewife from the 1950's.

That's me!!!

Women were so classy in the 1950s.........unlike the hoochies we see everywhere today..

 

[Rolyo85]

Some times you type words in the Quick Reply field. You should have that looked at.

 

[sixthson]

That's me!!!

Women were so classy in the 1950s.........unlike the hoochies we see everywhere today..

Just when we thought it was safe to go back in the water....

 

[Stardreamer]

Why would you wanna troll a community?

Cause its fun? And who knows you might actually convince someone of the error of their thinking. Unless of course your the one in error, in which case you just make for odious comic relief.

 

[Stardreamer]

I'm not in my right mind, and I would LOOOOOOVE to moderate this forum ^_^

Ironically, I actually restrain myself more when I'm a mod, but oh well - I'll never get to prove it.

Stardreamer - straight guys give lousy head

Yea but then I could bring up my SL persona's Dominate side and ridicule them over it.

 

[GhostMost]

Why would you wanna troll a community?

Because it's hilarious try it sometime. Creating chaos but really not trying to create chaos, it's great. Try not to be serious for a couple of seconds, it's fun.

 

[chance1]

we def have some trollers and some wanna be trollers in this thread

might be the best thing to come of this mess

 

[Just_Believe18]

I'm sure it's happened and that a few have been appropriately banned. As for the present, it is best not to go down that road and hint towards names. There's still a CoC to follow.

I will say that in terms of Republican sympathizers on this board, I am disappointed in the oftentimes lack of coherency and effort put into the discussion. Anywhere from basic grammar skills to citing sources and responding appropriately to rebuttals has been so severely lacking. Granted, Democrats on this board aren't perfect, can focus on silly issues, and at times, resort to personal attacks. However, the discussion caliber of the Republican sympathizers on this board is incomparably dismal. I find that the real conservatives of this board oftentimes side with the Democrats because the Republican way of thinking is so backwards and anti-conservative/anti-libertarian.

 

[chance1]

I'm sure it's happened and that a few have been appropriately banned. As for the present, it is best not to go down that road and hint towards names. There's still a CoC to follow.

I will say that in terms of Republican sympathizers on this board, I am disappointed in the oftentimes lack of coherency and effort put into the discussion. Anywhere from basic grammar skills to citing sources and responding appropriately to rebuttals has been so severely lacking. Granted, Democrats on this board aren't perfect, can focus on silly issues, and at times, resort to personal attacks. However, the discussion caliber of the Republican sympathizers on this board is incomparably dismal. I find that the real conservatives of this board oftentimes side with the Democrats because the Republican way of thinking is so backwards and anti-conservative/anti-libertarian.

I am disappointed in your grand standing here

Your first paragraph was nice - but evidently u felt the need to suggest - make that state categorically - that dem posters are smarter then repub posters - simplifying it a wee bit but that's the gist

sad and obnoxious sentiments

and incorrect as well

[Text: Removed by Moderator]

reminds me of a good family guy episode btw

 

[Just_Believe18]

I did not say anyone was smarter than another on this forum board, chance1. My statements concern the lack of standards in the quality of discussion that is frustrating and evident in multiple threads. This is a challenging sub-forum that has high expectations of discussing serious issues of politics and current events. If you believe poor discussion habits are an indication of intelligence, that is your belief, not mine.

 

[chance1]

I'm sure it's happened and that a few have been appropriately banned. As for the present, it is best not to go down that road and hint towards names. There's still a CoC to follow.

I will say that in terms of Republican sympathizers on this board, I am disappointed in the oftentimes lack of coherency and effort put into the discussion. Anywhere from basic grammar skills to citing sources and responding appropriately to rebuttals has been so severely lacking. Granted, Democrats on this board aren't perfect, can focus on silly issues, and at times, resort to personal attacks. However, the discussion caliber of the Republican sympathizers on this board is incomparably dismal. I find that the real conservatives of this board oftentimes side with the Democrats because the Republican way of thinking is so backwards and anti-conservative/anti-libertarian.

I did not say anyone was smarter than another on this forum board, chance1. My statements concern the lack of standards in the quality of discussion that is frustrating and evident in multiple threads. This is a challenging sub-forum that has high expectations of discussing serious issues of politics and current events. If you believe poor discussion habits are an indication of intelligence, that is your belief, not mine.

are you kidding? are you really trying to say that you did not call out republican posters as less than intelligent?

not sure what's worse - saying it or denying it when it's so obvious

what exactly were you saying then?

either way, the US vs THEM debate clearly is not just an Obama campaign theme - the one he is resting his future on and it's ill advised IMO - but it's obvious here - from this thread about [Text: Removed by Moderator] not being gay and therefore not authentic - and you saying Republican posters are not up to your/general standards

I just can't get over your follow up and the claim that you were NOT saying you/Dems are superior

would love others take on your post and re-post

perhaps I'm wrong

 

[GhostMost]

I did not say anyone was smarter than another on this forum board, chance1. My statements concern the lack of standards in the quality of discussion that is frustrating and evident in multiple threads. This is a challenging sub-forum that has high expectations of discussing serious issues of politics and current events. If you believe poor discussion habits are an indication of intelligence, that is your belief, not mine.

You're on a gay porn site by the way buddy .
I'm sorry dude but your posts lack personality, so I'm glad my posts aren't as well typed as your's are, it would just seem boring to me. You should always cover your points with personality, otherwise you're convincing no one because easily another person can come in and steal the show. I'm talking about real life as well as the internet.

 

[Rolyo85]

I think he's right. I don't have the decency to sugarcoat my speech like him, so I would totally say that Republicans' reasoning skills on this board often appear lacking. You can try to twist his words all you want, chance. It won't make Republican posts better.

 

[Rolyo85]

You're on a gay porn site by the way buddy .
I'm sorry dude but your posts lack personality, so I'm glad my posts aren't as well typed as your's are, it would just seem boring to me. You should always cover your points with personality, otherwise you're convincing no one because easily another person can come in and steal the show. I'm talking about real life as well as the internet.

Being an ignorant reactionary knee-jerker is the biggest lack of personality I can think of. Just saying.

 

[GhostMost]

Being an ignorant reactionary knee-jerker is the biggest lack of personality I can think of. Just saying.

then you don't understand personality

 

[Rolyo85]

Straight through the heart! Suh-NAP!

 

[GhostMost]

Straight through the heart! Suh-NAP!

I think that went both ways buddy . Let's all rebel against the Straight and Bi section because they're different, and a gay site should only be towards gay people.

 

[Just_Believe18]

You're on a gay porn site by the way buddy .
I'm sorry dude but your posts lack personality, so I'm glad my posts aren't as well typed as your's are, it would just seem boring to me. You should always cover your points with personality, otherwise you're convincing no one because easily another person can come in and steal the show. I'm talking about real life as well as the internet.

A gay porn site that has the largest gay and bi community on the Internet. Gay men who like pictures of dick are not any more or less intelligent than in general.

What does my personality have to do with the purpose of this discussion? Resorting to a personal attack does not drive the discussion here.

@chance1
I have explained exactly what I meant, chance1. You're the only one making the assumption that lower communication skills is somehow an indicator of someone being less intelligent. A person can put in very little effort into their grammar and still be very intelligent. A person can still be intelligent and make assumptions and not have the courtesy to provide proof and sources. It just means they are a poor communicator, with little regard to the respect of others or willing to make the effort to have a fun and engaging discussion.

Is it no wonder that such abuse has resulted in a disproportionate ban of Republican members on this forum? We had one member who would only create threads and post links with no commentary. When asked to clarify the point he was trying to debate, he would refuse to answer and then create a new, ambiguous thread. We had another member who insisted gay Republican groups were legitimate and would become very mean and personally abusive to other members during prolonged debates. I can also think of another long-standing member who baited and trolled this forum with obnoxious and irrelevant threads. The list goes on. It's not my personal bias on the matter, chance1. It's the historical reality of discourse within this sub-forum. If you want to claim this is because the "liberals shut out" the Republicans on this forum, then you're showing a lack of respect to the integrity of the moderators here on this board who have had to make that tough decision on permanently banning a member here.

 

[Rolyo85]

I am impressed by the respectful way this topic has been moderated. I expected it to be axed entirely. Tumbs up to the mods