The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

do U think the pope is good looking ?

JasunStrikesBack said:
Just remember... most of them probably have sex with kids. Or know someone who does and doesn't do shit about it.
Click to expand...

Touchez! That sort of exaggeration does nothing but express a lot of anger. I do understand the outrage about the pedophile priest who are a tiny fraction of all priests, and sadly are like a rotten potato that spoils the bushel. The fact is most priest are good people who are celibate and not harming children. In fact most of them work in a very difficult job, and do not deserve to be misrepresented.

Now, on topic, no I do not see the pope as a good looking man, nor is he infallible, and clearly is not an effective and able administrator. Mostly, like so many people, I ignore him and what he has to say.

Shep+:grrr::grrr::grrr:
 
Can one be assessed for good looks, when 82 years of age, from an unflattering photograph?

Will Brad Pitt retain his good looks, when/if he makes it to 82 years?
 
RobertACE said:
Do you really think he's given up his sex life? I'll place you odds that he's still active! LOL :lol: :p
Click to expand...


If your evidence is so certain then you can earn some good money by communicating your proof to the New York Times.

I recommend that you do this today.
 
RobertACE said:
Do I need any proof? LOL

Besides, I was speaking of odds, not proof! :badgrin:
Click to expand...

Ah! Implication - based upon spurious speculation. So you have no idea.

That's clear enough. I thought for a moment that you had shared some personal time with this priest.;)
 
RobertACE said:
LOL, Well, when you're dealing in odds, it usually involves a certain amount of speculation. Whether you consider it an implication and/or spurious is all a matter of opinion and how you personally perceive the data that's out there. It is possible to make an educated guess! All I'm saying is that there's a lot of data out there, especially when you consider all press the catholic church has been getting on this topic lately. Generally speaking, I wouldn't know if this priest was active or not, but considering his good looks it wouldn't surprise me if a few women, if not men, have at least tried to test his limits. Sexuality is a part of who we're all about and priest aren't that much different IMO! ;)
Click to expand...

It other words you don't know this priest.

Appearances are often deceptive. The wise person learns never to judge another human being's behaviour by their image.

That's crystal clear. I have no further comment.
 
RobertACE said:
It has nothing to do with judging this priest's behavior specifically! It has everything to do with being honest about our own human nature, which the Catholic church hasn't been very honest about IMO. Anyway, you should learn the difference between odds versus facts and when someone is also just speaking in generalities.

That's all I'm saying! :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You have judged the priest. Without knowing him. You have stated very clearly that you believe that as a result of this priest's good looks he is more likely to dishonour his vows. That's judging a person based upon their appearance.

You do not know this priest's nature. You do not know this person. Yet you write as if you do know him, by casting aspersions on his behaviour. It is not about you speculating on the odds that he is not honouring his vows. It is about your very clear statement that you assess the behaviour of a person, unknown to you, by their appearance.

WOW! Fred Phelps and ilk would enjoy your judgemental company.
 
RobertACE said:
Whatever! :rolleyes:

Anyway, I thought you had no further comment!

Talking about Fred Phelps? You're obviously the one who's in the mood for preaching! Why don't you start your own thread? LOL
Click to expand...


That was my way of ending our discussion. You continued to justify, your deplorable position. I was obliged to remind you that your speculations are unsupportable.

I am not the one who is preaching, or judging. You have made the unsupported allegations, by utilising language that implies that the priest is guilty per your innuendo.
 
Telstra said:
lol

pope-benedict1.jpg
Click to expand...

LOL! Got to be kidding right? The man looks evil. Nothing Holy looking about that face.:eek:
 
Not all priests are Kiddie fidlers, I was raised Catholic and not one of the miserable bastards ever laid a hand on me.
 
RobertACE said:
Do you really think he's given up his sex life? I'll place you odds that he's still active! LOL :lol: :p
Click to expand...

power is better than sex.
He gave up sex a long time ago.

However i would not be surprised if he have sex with other priests often ...:badgrin:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top