The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Do you agree with Jesse Ventura's statement?

Do you agree with Jesse's take on his generation in the same way about gay rights instead of Vietnam


  • Total voters
    13
-Jesse Ventura in Don't Start the Revolution Without Me (page 267).

Couldn't this quote be applied to gay's civil rights in the contest of seeing African Americans hosed down and marginalized in their youth? And how in 2008 they voted against our rights?

When will they learn? When will enough be enough?

PS: Don't worry, I'm not some loser looking over the net for quotes. I'm 90% complete in the book. I decided to purchase this book after seeing him devour some hosts on Fox News.

Once again no options for "none of the above."

I completely get what Jesse Ventura is saying, and I agree with him.

But your poll?

It was written to confirm your own preconceived prejudices and ideas, to support your own view that everything is just so "black and white," and if "only we could get rid of..." the older people who don't see things the way that I do.

Talk about naive. :(

If you're talking about Jesse Ventura rebuking African-Americans for standing against us, instead of (at the very least marginally) standing with us, then I think I might be able to see where you're coming from.

I'm pretty sure that I can find some "statistical data" which proves that African-Americans, and Hispanics are MORE socially conservative than "GOP Conservatives" but will never identify as "Republicans" because of the GOP's history of hiding behind "State's Rights," and how the current GOP were former "Southern Democrats" who left the party after LBJ's "Civil Rights Act."

So historically, from my opinion, Jesse Ventura is pissing up a tree. ..|

But wouldn't your logic be so much simpler if we all just "renewed" like they did in Logan's Run?

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WUUnc1M0TA[/ame]

The only problem is no one lived beyond the age of 30, and many of the persons that you seem to promote are in their 40s or beyond. [-X

There's "Science Fiction," and then there's "Social Fiction."

I'm not saying, I'm just saying. ;)
 
Older people are generally opposed to gay marriage because that view is reflective of the times and country where they grew up. Gay marriage was not even a consideration a few years ago. Young people are increasingly in favor of gay marriage because they have grown up in a world where gay marriage is a reality and a fait accompli in the US. While it is possible to admire and agree with young people about gay marriage, belief in gay marriage is not in and of itself a virtuous act. In fact, it may be more admirable for an older person to believe in gay marriage because they grew up in a world where gay marriage was unheard of.

I see no reason why I should need young people to be an "equal" in this country. I am equal, I have had a partner for what seems like an eternity and we have no need or desire to skip down the aisle like a couple of str8 people, but to each his own, it should be a right.

The real irony is that gay people live rather normal lives in many areas of the country, b ut apparently, some have adopted the mantle of victimhood. Instead of revelling in the freedom and acceptance they have, they prefer to whine and moan about "oppression" and look for scapegoats to blame their unhappiness.

Not in the eyes of the law are you equal. Heaven forbid you get sick. Or your partner.

Black people whined and moaned in the 60's too at their treatment. Maybe they should have just shut up and let things be?

It's all coming to me now why so little progress has been made. And part of it is the nonchalant attitude towards advancing gays' rights even within the community. Your whole tangent about me complaining about my circumstances in just like the Republicans that hate when minorities cite institution racism as a problem in America.

Believe it or not Iman, America has problems. And not talking about it won't make things better.

And lastly, I find it necessary that older folks learn from the mistakes they've witnessed in their lifetimes. How they can see black people being hosed for marching for equal rights and not equate that with gays attempting to marry is beyond me.
 
Not in the eyes of the law are you equal. Heaven forbid you get sick. Or your partner.

Black people whined and moaned in the 60's too at their treatment. Maybe they should have just shut up and let things be?

It's all coming to me now why so little progress has been made. And part of it is the nonchalant attitude towards advancing gays' rights even within the community. Your whole tangent about me complaining about my circumstances in just like the Republicans that hate when minorities cite institution racism as a problem in America.

Believe it or not Iman, America has problems. And not talking about it won't make things better.

And lastly, I find it necessary that older folks learn from the mistakes they've witnessed in their lifetimes. How they can see black people being hosed for marching for equal rights and not equate that with gays attempting to marry is beyond me.

BECAUSE in their EYES, you're an immoral piece of shit that's DAMNED TO HELL!

Praise Jesus!

Just because they "vote" Democrat doesn't mean that they don't have more in common with the "Social Conservatives" of the Republican Party.

And the fact that many a Gay within the DNC don't recognize that pisses them off all the more.

It's now a matter of historical record, and demographic facts, that more African-Americans, and Hispanics (Traditionally Democratic Strong Holds) voted FOR Proposition 8 in California, than GOP Evangelicals, and "Social Conservatives" did. It would NOT have passed without that "caucus" of the Democratic Base.

I can't believe that you're so quick to crunch the numbers on "age" and "education," and "income" that you can't see the "social conservative" aspect of those demographics.

You're to easily coaxed into a partisan demographic to pay any attention.

I can give you proof that the DNC has told many a State Democratic Party to "not get involved," so as to not "split the party" on such issues as "Gay Equality" and "Marriage Amendments" to State Constitutions.

But you want to blame a "caucus."

"Cant' understand."

The sooner that you come to terms with that, then the sooner that your "demographic" can do something to change it.

But it's us old fuckers, do nothing, douche bags that has all but made it impossible for your age group to do anything. :rolleyes:
 
BECAUSE in their EYES, you're an immoral piece of shit that's DAMNED TO HELL!

Praise Jesus!

Just because they "vote" Democrat doesn't mean that they don't have more in common with the "Social Conservatives" of the Republican Party.


It's now a matter of historical record, and demographic facts, that more African-Americans, and Hispanics (Traditionally Democratic Strong Holds) voted FOR Proposition 8 in California, than GOP Evangelicals, and "Social Conservatives" did. It would NOT have passed without that "caucus" of the Democratic Base.


My hypothesis with many in the Black Community is that their problem with Gay Marriage has more to do with their own personal distaste and disgust for the homosexual lifestyle than it has to do with religious reasons. However, make no mistake about it, they simply say on the surface that it's because of "religious reasons".

I have a feeling that it's the exact same tactic used amongst many Whites, as well. Blame it on "religious reasons", however in reality it's simply hatred for the lifestyle.

If Blacks are such devout Christians and are such Social Conservatives, obviously it's a lot of picking and choosing on which parts of the Bible they wish to follow. When we take a look at the number of single Mothers in the Black Community, and we take a look at the amount of Crime in the Black Community, and we take a look at the number of abortions in the Black Community, and so forth .... evidently they apparently don't believe in those parts of the Bible.

But when it comes to Homosexuality, all of that changes, and apparently they think God is very much against that. Just not any of the other stuff they don't wish to pay attention to, evidently. :rolleyes:

And to the Black posters reading this, don't get me wrong at all. Hell, we can find all sorts of hypocrites in the White Community who claim they are against Gay Marriage and Gay Rights for "Religious Reasons" as well ... yet are caught sinning left and right in doing the same things. However, I just think the attitude against Homosexuality seems to be more prevalent in the Black Community and to a slightly lesser degree ... the Hispanic Community, more so than amongst Whites. And I think it is more so Bigotry underneath all around amongst all the Races .... with the surface reason being given as "Religion".

Basically, a game is being played called "Let's pick which parts of the Bible we want to follow."
 
My hypothesis with many in the Black Community is that their problem with Gay Marriage has more to do with their own personal distaste and disgust for the homosexual lifestyle than it has to do with religious reasons. However, make no mistake about it, they simply say on the surface that it's because of "religious reasons".

I have a feeling that it's the exact same tactic used amongst many Whites, as well. Blame it on "religious reasons", however in reality it's simply hatred for the lifestyle.


If Blacks are such devout Christians and are such Social Conservatives, obviously it's a lot of picking and choosing on which parts of the Bible they wish to follow. When we take a look at the number of single Mothers in the Black Community, and we take a look at the amount of Crime in the Black Community, and we take a look at the number of abortions in the Black Community, and so forth .... evidently they apparently don't believe in those parts of the Bible.

But when it comes to Homosexuality, all of that changes, and apparently they think God is very much against that. Just not any of the other stuff they don't wish to pay attention to, evidently. :rolleyes:

And to the Black posters reading this, don't get me wrong at all. Hell, we can find all sorts of hypocrites in the White Community who claim they are against Gay Marriage and Gay Rights for "Religious Reasons" as well ... yet are caught sinning left and right in doing the same things. However, I just think the attitude against Homosexuality seems to be more prevalent in the Black Community and to a slightly lesser degree ... the Hispanic Community, more so than amongst Whites. And I think it is more so Bigotry underneath all around amongst all the Races .... with the surface reason being given as "Religion".

Basically, a game is being played called "Let's pick which parts of the Bible we want to follow."

You know, I could be a complete prick.

Not as a Moderator of this Forum, but as someone who's been here long enough to know who posts what, and where they're coming from, and why they post what they do.

MystikWizard said:
it's a lot of picking and choosing on which parts of the Bible they wish to follow.

Granted.

But isn't that what's WRONG with the entire "Evangelical Movement" within the GOP?

Wouldn't it be safe to assume that when some GOP Douchebag rails against "Gay Marriage" that it's actually code for "I'm having an extra-marital affair?"

But now as a recent Democratic "convert" you want to hold the African-American / Hispanic Caucuses within the DNC to a standard that most Moderate/Fiscal Conservatives within the GOP have been unable to call another caucus upon, that for more nearly 30 years has given us "Reaganomics," a "Trickle Down Economy," and anything that worships Barry Goldwater, while pissing on his grave?

Pfffft!

The GLBT movement has FAILED in latching themselves onto a party that only has in it's platform "equality for all."
 
You know, I could be a complete prick.

Not as a Moderator of this Forum, but as someone who's been here long enough to know who posts what, and where they're coming from, and why they post what they do.

Well, I will say that I have a much greater respect who don't abuse their "authority" just because of personal prejudices. So in that regard, I appreciate whatever consideration you are apparently giving me.

I am simply speaking very bluntly to what I believe. No real hidden reason on me posting that. I post it because I honestly think it's the truth. People can feel free to disagree, and perhaps I'm wrong. I just don't think I am, and think I am on track with my belief.




Granted.

But isn't that what's WRONG with the entire "Evangelical Movement" within the GOP?

Absolutely. Nobody is saying otherwise. However, Gay Rights is part of the Democratic Agenda, and obviously there is dissension amongst the Races on this topic. I'm just curious why Black and Hispanic Democrats have more of a problem with it than White Democrats. That's all.


Wouldn't it be safe to assume that when some GOP Douchebag rails against "Gay Marriage" that it's actually code for "I'm having an extra-marital affair?"

Most likely. Mark Sanford says hello. Not sure what you are getting at, though. Gay Rights aren't part of the GOP platform and we know that. The general expectation is that any GOP voter, regardless of race, is a lost cause.

I simply think that Democrats expect other Democrats to stick up for each other, especially in cases of Civil Rights and Discrimination.


But now as a recent Democratic "convert" you want to hold the African-American / Hispanic Caucuses within the DNC to a standard that most Moderate/Fiscal Conservatives within the GOP have been unable to call another caucus upon, that for more nearly 30 years has given us "Reaganomics," a "Trickle Down Economy," and anything that worships Barry Goldwater, while pissing on his grave?

Pfffft!

The GLBT movement has FAILED in latching themselves onto a party that only has in it's platform "equality for all."

That's true and that is also unfortunate. I simply would like to get a better understanding as to why ... and that is across the board on all Races. And if one Race happens to vote against Gay Rights in a higher proportion, they happen to get more attention. That's all.

If Black Democrats would have been overwhelmingly against Prop 8, while White Democrats would have supported the legislation ... then the attention and focus would be on the Whites and "why they voted for it".
 
BECAUSE in their EYES, you're an immoral piece of shit that's DAMNED TO HELL!

Praise Jesus!

Just because they "vote" Democrat doesn't mean that they don't have more in common with the "Social Conservatives" of the Republican Party.

And the fact that many a Gay within the DNC don't recognize that pisses them off all the more.

It's now a matter of historical record, and demographic facts, that more African-Americans, and Hispanics (Traditionally Democratic Strong Holds) voted FOR Proposition 8 in California, than GOP Evangelicals, and "Social Conservatives" did. It would NOT have passed without that "caucus" of the Democratic Base.

I can't believe that you're so quick to crunch the numbers on "age" and "education," and "income" that you can't see the "social conservative" aspect of those demographics.

You're to easily coaxed into a partisan demographic to pay any attention.

I can give you proof that the DNC has told many a State Democratic Party to "not get involved," so as to not "split the party" on such issues as "Gay Equality" and "Marriage Amendments" to State Constitutions.

But you want to blame a "caucus."

"Cant' understand."

The sooner that you come to terms with that, then the sooner that your "demographic" can do something to change it.

But it's us old fuckers, do nothing, douche bags that has all but made it impossible for your age group to do anything. :rolleyes:

Call a spade a spade. What you're doing is calling the garbage man a sanitation specialist. Doesn't change the fact that he's still picks up trash for a living.

Calling a prejudiced person in 2009 a bigot, one that votes to lower a groups' standing in society is still a prejudiced bastard, is indeed correct.

"I'm not an intolerant homophobe. I'm a social conservative who think's you shouldn't be equal in the eyes of the law. Hardly intolerant."

:rolleyes:

Let them feel the shame for having a view point that fewer and fewer Americans support by the day. They're truly getting left behind.

They don't need your counsel though to soften their bigotry by giving them a nicer sounding title. Social conservative my ass.
 
That's true and that is also unfortunate. I simply would like to get a better understanding as to why ... and that is across the board on all Races. And if one Race happens to vote against Gay Rights in a higher proportion, they happen to get more attention. That's all.

If Black Democrats would have been overwhelmingly against Prop 8, while White Democrats would have supported the legislation ... then the attention and focus would be on the Whites and "why they voted for it".

The age factor supersedes even race! Young blacks supported gay marriage narrowly in California. Saw this statistic right after the election when posters were PMSing about the black folk vote.

My suggestion is redirect your anger! It ain't black or Latinos.
 
The age factor supersedes even race! Young blacks supported gay marriage narrowly in California. Saw this statistic right after the election when posters were PMSing about the black folk vote.

My suggestion is redirect your anger! It ain't black or Latinos.
Age does not supersede race.
Prop 8 was passed by 52% of the voters.
85% were Christians
57% were non white
56% were over 55
52% were men
Redirect your anger, and start at the top of the list.
 
Not in the eyes of the law are you equal. Heaven forbid you get sick. Or your partner.

Black people whined and moaned in the 60's too at their treatment. Maybe they should have just shut up and let things be?

It's all coming to me now why so little progress has been made. And part of it is the nonchalant attitude towards advancing gays' rights even within the community. Your whole tangent about me complaining about my circumstances in just like the Republicans that hate when minorities cite institution racism as a problem in America.

Believe it or not Iman, America has problems. And not talking about it won't make things better.

And lastly, I find it necessary that older folks learn from the mistakes they've witnessed in their lifetimes. How they can see black people being hosed for marching for equal rights and not equate that with gays attempting to marry is beyond me.

This is such a crock of shit, I don't know where to start, but I'm not worried about being sick, we have Doctors and Lawyers that take care of these things as do most gay men.

Black people in the 60's were getting shot and lynched and the most blood you ever spilled was either from a period or a nose bleed. Your masquerade as an oppressed person is a disgrace considering the fact that many people in the world really are suffering.

We have grievances and legal problems that need attention, but we are not suffering in the same way as others.

Condemning entire groups based on the thoughts or actions of some is bigotry, plain and simple. You seem to like to think of yourself as a "victim" and are now doing your best to "victimize" others in a pattern reminiscent of the syndrome of child abuse. Help is available for people like yourself, but you won't find it around this forum.
 
Obviously we don't live under a "system that perpetrates oppression" since minorities have been able to access the system to an unprecedented extent during the last 40 years.

If you really want to live under oppression go to Iran or Burma or any of hundreds of other countries. Anyone living in Europe, Canada, the US or most Western nations should stop dressing in the drag of victimhood and act like serious people.

Ah yes, so the cops have mostly stopped beating us and killing us. And half the population doesn't want us to go back into the closet.

The argument that things are worse "over there" doesn't change the situations here. Especially when similar social institutions (religious fanaticism, imperialism, unequal distribution of wealth/lack of wealth) are responsible across the board.

Don't forget the the Weimar republic was one of the most liberal democratic regimes at the time before the Nazi's took power, fool.
 
Once again people still lack an understanding of black people and the culture.

When will people learn?

You can't expect people to vote for you and side with you because you feel the struggle is the same as theirs. I am black, and I don't see the gay civil rights movement as the same as the black civil rights movement.

Good lord, time to start pulling some heads out of some asses.

I do expect it. Just because you don't see it that way does not mean your view is correct. Being black does not give anyone an automatic inside scoop on civil rights, nor does being black equal an understanding of being white. So, get pulling, but you're going to have to reach behind you.
 
Black people in the 60's were getting shot and lynched and the most blood you ever spilled was either from a period or a nose bleed. Your masquerade as an oppressed person is a disgrace considering the fact that many people in the world really are suffering.

We have grievances and legal problems that need attention, but we are not suffering in the same way as others.

Matthew Sheppard had more than a nosebleed in the 1990's. Gay people didn't just get lynchings in the Holocaust, they got whole gas chambers. Gay people were forgotten in psychiatric hospitals.

When White Gays compare the Gay Civil Rights movement to the Black Civil Rights movement, Whites aren't saying (as far as I can see) that Gays went through all the hardships that Blacks did.

White Gays aren't saying that all of us were living on plantations, were enslaved, were beaten on a daily basis for not producing enough output each day, or were told to go to the back of the bus ... or anything like that. Let's be perfectly clear on that. Gays have had a very difficult time being accepted in society, but we (White Gays) ARE NOT comparing what we went through, to what Blacks had to go through in order to obtain their Civil Rights.

In many ways, a lot of Gays can blend in easier within society, where as Blacks obviously can not. We can do our best to hide our true selves, as long as we aren't overly effeminate (Men) or overly Masculine (Women). So, we have an easier time in that regard. However, it is very psychologically damaging in that depending on our surroundings, we can not actually be our true selves for fear of being fired for being Gay, or being the subject of hate crimes depending on where we live, can't walk out on the street with a loved one without being given nasty looks or having negative comments thrown your direction, can't get married, etc.

Essentially, what I think needs to sink in with those in the Black Community that White Gays aren't saying what we have had to go through is the same degree of hardship that the ancestors of Blacks had to go through .... but rather we look at the movement as being along the same THEME ... and that THEME is "fighting discrimination".

I am a white gay guy, and I am saying we easily had to go through the same degree of hardship as black people. No black parent treated their child as a freak, or a traitor, or a degenerate, simply because they were born black. When slaves were being freed, gay people were being locked away in asylums, or castrated, or injected with testosterone by Mengele or any number of medical "pioneers" before him. Gay people face terror at the hands of their own family. Even a black slave had a mother who loved him.

Gay people don't face those struggles today, but then again neither do black people. It is because a whole lot of people worked hard to make it that way. Gay people support equality for black people, gay or straight, and I'm here to say the expectation is mutual.

Wake up.
 
I am a white gay guy, and I am saying we easily had to go through the same degree of hardship as black people.


Again, we need to be clear about this, because I don't feel you are helping matters that much by making statements like this. From what I can tell, we need to be more specific with Blacks, because somewhere there is clearly a lack of communication, and we aren't on the same page with a lot of them.

To our Black friends on here, we are not comparing what we have to go through today, to what your ancestors went through.

*****However, at the same time, YOU GUYS clearly aren't going through what your ancestors had to go through, in this day and age. But, the attitude from SOME (a percentage) Blacks would almost seem that today's Blacks feel they are also out there on the plantation picking cotton, churning butter, and getting lashed on a daily basis out in the fields. And that is the kind of mentality that is also creating a rift between Blacks and the rest of society.

If we want to talk about Civil Rights and being treated equally, and discrimination, that's one thing. But for Blacks to imply that they feel they are still treated like slaves in society in this day and age, that is what has to come to an end.

So Bankside, as Gay Whites, we absolutely can not imply that we went through the same things that the ancestors of Blacks had to go through. I think if you are making an outrageous claim like that, then I think that is disgusting. But, if you want to compare being Gay today in this day and age, compared to being Black in this day and age ... I think those two are much more comparable.

To Whites and Blacks, we need to deal with the HERE and NOW when making these comparisons. White Gays are not talking about comparing the Gay Civil Rights Movement to Slavery. So let's get the "S" word out of the picture.


No black parent treated their child as a freak, or a traitor, or a degenerate, simply because they were born black.

That is absolutely very true. However, if anything, Blacks should realize this as they certainly had to go through the same thing within their own households. It wasn't just Whites that dealt with the impact of the family hating you.

Out in public, Blacks have made tremendous headway. However, based on what I see, Blacks seem to have an easier time in public than Gays do.

Blacks can get married. Gays can not.


When slaves were being freed, gay people were being locked away in asylums, or castrated, or injected with testosterone by Mengele or any number of medical "pioneers" before him. Gay people face terror at the hands of their own family. Even a black slave had a mother who loved him.

What about a Black Gay person, though? Do you think they would be as loving, if they knew the child was Gay back centuries ago?

Gay people don't face those struggles today, but then again neither do black people.

Like I said, I think there are a lot of Blacks out there that still attempt to pull the "Slavery" card, and that stuff just doesn't fly with me as far as I'm concerned. Blacks do not live in slavery today. They do not live the same life that their ancestors do, so I resent it when Blacks try to compare their own lives with the lives of their ancestors. It isn't the same thing. It isn't anywhere near the same thing. But this is where a lot of Whites get upset with Blacks, because we know this, and it is insulting to our intelligence to pretend that a Black person today is going through the same type of life that their Black Ancestors went through.

However, being Black today and being Gay today are much more comparable. However, I think Blacks are overwhelmingly held in higher regard with the public today, compared to Gays. Put it this way, we elected a Black President. Do you think a Gay President could ever be elected in this day and age? You know the answer to that. It's a resounding "No". So I think that is a good indication with where Gays stand in the eyes of the public, compared to Blacks.

Like I stated before, I think Gay Blacks need to understand that the themes of the two movements are what is being compared. Not who suffered worst. And that theme is Ending Discrimination and fighting for Equal Rights. Gays should be allowed to get married. Gays should be allowed to be open in public, and live without the fear of being persecuted. Gays shouldn't have to fear coming out to their parents. Gays shouldn't have to fear losing their jobs if their employer knows their true Sexuality.

And I think Marley is correct in the Hot Topics thread when he indicated that he feels there is a lot of Self Hatred amongst Blacks who are also Gay. And that could also be a possible reason why many don't view the movements as the same. They hear from their parents the type of life their parents and grandparents lived through and the hardships they faced .... yet homosexuality is viewed as utterly detestable in the Gay Community. Therefore, a lot of Blacks likely hate themselves and simply adopt their parents beliefs simply by hearing their parents words.

Again, Blacks need to keep in mind that the comparisons are along the line of theme. Not who's ancestors suffered worse in the past.


It is because a whole lot of people worked hard to make it that way. Gay people support equality for black people, gay or straight, and I'm here to say the expectation is mutual.

Wake up.

And I agree. And this is something more in the Black Community perhaps do need to wake up, too. If I had to vote on a bill which fought discrimination against Blacks, I would unquestionably support it. Therefore, the expectation is mutual, as you said.
 
^We are talking about the present, most of us were not even alive when Mengele was busy. I'm older than most in this forum and my problems with hostility have been minimal, I'm free to go where I want and free to do what I want. If you want to pin a pink star on your chest and a "KIck Me" sign on your back, be my guest, but don't tell me about your suffering unless your prepared to detail it.

If you're really into victimization, there are plenty of whip bearing leather types that will be glad to accommodate you, just don't make your fetish a political cause celebre.
 
We have a choice. We can talk about the present, or the past.

When I talk about the past historical position of black people, I can correctly compare it to the past historical position of gay people. The parallels are obvious.

The parallels are also obvious in more recent history. iman, if you are free to go where you want it is because brave people laid down their lives. And I will not debate people who want to twist my words to suggest that I compare the modern position of gay people to the historical position of black people. However, when we are comparing histories, I would point out that nonchristian or nonsubservient women were also burned en masse as witches in the so called land of the brave and home of the free.

My point is, it hurts just as badly if you are burned as a witch, or lynched for being black, or beaten up, tied to a fence and left to die for being gay. In each case it is systematic opportunism combined with hatred.

Any anyone who feels they are entitled to a greater degree of indignation because they belong to x or y such group is an idiot, and I intend to continue saying so.

The struggle for equal dignity is only one struggle, and the only equation that can be made is "civil rights" = "equal rights for gays."
 
Matthew Sheppard had more than a nosebleed in the 1990's. Gay people didn't just get lynchings in the Holocaust, they got whole gas chambers. Gay people were forgotten in psychiatric hospitals.



I am a white gay guy, and I am saying we easily had to go through the same degree of hardship as black people. No black parent treated their child as a freak, or a traitor, or a degenerate, simply because they were born black. When slaves were being freed, gay people were being locked away in asylums, or castrated, or injected with testosterone by Mengele or any number of medical "pioneers" before him. Gay people face terror at the hands of their own family. Even a black slave had a mother who loved him.

Gay people don't face those struggles today, but then again neither do black people. It is because a whole lot of people worked hard to make it that way. Gay people support equality for black people, gay or straight, and I'm here to say the expectation is mutual.

Wake up.

Don't agree at all. The older folks then hosed the blacks down. Now they've learned to use the ballot against us.

I guess the ballot is more civil than having high pressure water shot at you.
 
^We are talking about the present, most of us were not even alive when Mengele was busy. I'm older than most in this forum and my problems with hostility have been minimal, I'm free to go where I want and free to do what I want. If you want to pin a pink star on your chest and a "KIck Me" sign on your back, be my guest, but don't tell me about your suffering unless your prepared to detail it.

If you're really into victimization, there are plenty of whip bearing leather types that will be glad to accommodate you, just don't make your fetish a political cause celebre.

Everything is A-Ok, eh Iman? What's the gay equivalent to Uncle Tom? "Yessa massa, I beez a good ol' black bo'."

A Tio Taco? A Benedict Arnold?

A lot of times foreign posters come in here and ask why gays in America have to beg for things they have over there. Well, I think you have part of the answer here. Some of the older folks are happy getting the short end of the stick.

This is really pathetic.
 
^ Yawn. Don'tcha have another song to sing?

I'll stop singing it when it goes out of style. Out of style like lynchings and moving people to the back of the bus solely because they have more pigment in their skin. Out of style like holding someone's sexual preference against them.

When that goes out of style, I'll stop.
 
Back
Top