I agree with you we are all entitled to our opinion,s
Yes, we are all entitled to our opinions, but that wasn't really what I was talking about. The claims being made are not expressions of opinions but are proposed descriptions about reality...such things are not opinions, they are either true or false, regardless of what an individual believes them to be. The method to identify true vs false is by presenting and understanding evidence.
but why try and be sarcastic or rude when it comes to what beliefs people hold regarding their faith whatever
that faith may be?
I think that whenever a discussion enters into the realm of religious belief, even the most respectful arguments may be felt as sarcastic, rude, or insulting, because of the value a person has placed upon their religious beliefs. As they have elevated those beliefs to one of the most important facets of their individual identity, criticisms or debunking of those beliefs is taken as a personal attack, even when not meant as one, because of the way a person identifies themselves through their religion. A criticism of the belief becomes, in their minds, a personal attack. It is a stigma of conversation that we, as a society, need to dig ourselves out from. Religious beliefs should be no more immune to criticism and scrutiny than any other topic. We tolerate heated debates when it's republican vs democrat, but bring religion into the conversation, and it becomes a kind of no-man's land, even though I would argue that religious beliefs informs people's actions far greater than any political affiliation ever would, and since that is the basis by which most of those in power in my country make decisions, religion is not only not immune to scrutiny, scrutiny is an absolute necessity.
Even among differring group,s of people who profess the same faith you have countless opinions and many a heated discussion. :-
You would think, that with so many variants, a person would want to do everything possible to verify that what they believe is accurate and correct, but that often doesn't seem to be the case.
On a footnote i said it was unfair and illogical to say mikeylove made it up as i doubt he is over 2000yrs
old.
Can we agree that, until some evidence is presented to validate the claims, it is fair to hold the position that, at some point in time, someone "made it up"?