EuroSoccer
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2012
- Posts
- 1,308
- Reaction score
- 4
- Points
- 0
Extremely so - the standard porn formula has become so worn-out. Studios are blaming the internet for slow sales, and although partly true, it is also due to "formulas" copies to death...
Take the typical gay porn scene:
1. Top sucks bottom.
2. Bottom sucks Top.
3. Top mounts bottom.
4. Bottom get on top.
5. Top cums.
6. Bottom wanks till he cums.
7. Scene...
*yawn*
This represents 98% of all gay porn scenes. This is why the rough and bareback scenes have become so popular - people are bored...
Partially true
That represents 98% of professional porn (Big Studios).............smaller Studios and Amateurs provide a more exciting alternative
The biggest problem with Big studios is that the actors .............act (badly)
You described that pretty well, they follow the same old routine like robots and without passion.
Porn is about pleasure, if the people that fuck in front of a camera don't look like they are loving it, I am not interested.
The face and the expression of the faces are actually 50% of what I look in porn
I said it many times, I am not a cock whore, I don't really give a shit about pictures that shows only the cock and not the face the penis belong to.
I want to see lust in their eyes, and a good Porn Star should be able to fake that (But they don't).
That's why I find Amateur and smaller niche Studios better porn material, they enjoy what they do.
One of the few Porn Stars I like is Johnny Rapid.................just look at his face when he gets fucked.
I could cum just looking at his face expressions, even if I don't see a single cock in the scene.
I am sure he is faking it, but he is good at it, unfortunately not many actors are as talented as him.


It's such a letdown.
