Well, I'm not sure if I should wade back into this debate, but here are a few rebuttals to think on.
The way you talk is like you take that thread the wrong way.
A lot of straight men hates women who are feminist.
See? There you go again qualifying it with the word "straight." A lot of
men hate feminism. Hell, a lot of
women aren't too hot for it either - I've met women who don't really intend to vote, but would still prefer if men held doors for them (A naive description, I'm aware, but that's what it means to them). "Those dumb bitches who wanted jobs ruined it for the rest of us."
Some straight men i know.Saw the movie I Spit On Your Grave.This is an horror movie.In that movie a women get raped often by some men.At the end of the movie she kills these men.These straight men i know hate that movie because of the feminist message in that movie.These straight men were talking against feminist.They were insulting them.
See, that's not a quality of heterozexuality; it's a quality of stupidity. Not having seen the movie, I can't say how feminist it actually is, but the whole wronged/revent thing isn't uniquely feminist.
If i made a thread about.Do you think straight men can be feminist?It s because straight men are more concern about it.Most of the time feminist talk against straight men.Not against gay men.So gay men are not really concern about it.
You really think so? Most feminists I've dealt with tend to lump all men together. Gay men aren't excused from being oppressive patriarchal swine. Especially if you factor in the lesbian-feminists, many of whom seem to have a special bone to pick with gay men. I've never met a feminist woman who didn't have as much (or more) to say to me than any straight man. in the room.
If i ve done a thread about.Do you think gay men can be feminist?It would be weird because gay men are known to be more feminist than straight men.
They
are? I must have missed that memo. I've heard it argued (by well-educated feminists, no less) that gay men are in many ways
less feminist than straight men.
Women and gay men are often persecuted by straight men.So women and gay men have to fight for their rights.
Yes, but the rights of gay men are not the rights of straight women. To some degree, they are in competition for the soapbox when it comes time to talk issues. By that logic, gay/lesbian folks and bisexual folks should be as thick as thieves. But there's constant conflict, as you can even occasionally see on these boards. What about gay men and lesbians. Either of the above and the transgendered? What happens when we introduce race? It woulf be nice to think that mutual oppression would cause such groups to pull together, but I don't think it's that universal.
A lot of straight men think that they are superior to women.
Again, you can remove "straight" from that sentence and it would still be true.
It s normal that women are not happy about it.S

ften women who are feminist talk against straight men.
Women who are feminist discuss
men, regardless of their sexuality. My sexuality never saved me from verbal assault when the discussion of gender politics stopped being civil. The two aren't that closely related.
Gay men don t think that women are inferior.A lot straight men think that women are inferior.
Sure they do; I've met them. I've met gay men every bit as ragingly misogynistic as your average *insert politically incorrect stereotype here*, but since he'll never
date a woman, it's just considered "cute."
It s not a naive assumption.It's not a naive question.
Yes, it is naive. It's naive to assume that feminist women perceive gay men as allies just because they're gay. It's naive to assume that gay men are more feminist just because they don't want to have sex with women (or any other quality you ascribe to gay men). It's naive to assume that intelligent, thoughtful straight men couldn't be just as committed.
It s a problem who concern mostly straight men.When you hear about feminism.You hear about straight men.Not gay men.
No, I hear about
men. Come to think of it, more often these days I hear about
women. Because that's who feminism is really about.
Some straight men are feminist and some straight men ar not feminist.
Taking this as a given, why ask the question?
No need to make a thread about.Do you think gay men can be feminist because gay men can more easily be feminist than straight men.
This is not proven. Given that gay men can (and sometimes do) socialize wholly with other men, why would they even
care about feminism?[/quote]Straight men have to admit that they often badly treat women.[/quote]Like a gay man never treated a woman poorly?
Feminist are there to fixed problems about straight men.
It was my understanding that feminists were there to fix the problems of
women.
Straight men can t talk against feminist.If they talk against feminist.They don t want equality.
That's not true at all. Such talk is only true if one accepts that the goal of feminism is actual
equality. I've heard the argument before that this is not the case.
Women,straight men and gay men should all be equal.
So they should. Your point?
A lot of straight men are not aware of that yet.
A lot of people are not aware of that, but it's not a condition unique to straight men.