Dominus
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2017
- Posts
- 5,541
- Reaction score
- 603
- Points
- 113
Perhaps you don't own your bias, but anyone choosing an article with a title that includes "racially" in large font, is either disingenuous or deceptive. If you read the article which you linked, you could not have avoided it's racial direction in every sentence. It was literally the point of the article. Being "careful" not to use the term in your post doesn't change the point of the article.
I don't have any position that is was racial or not, as we can't know without being there or seeing it, but the case is only in that article because of the racial allegation.
And as I said before, I know about the racial thing brought up in that article. But it didn't occur to me to not use it. I was googling around and happened to have picked that link for this thread. I did it without thinking about it. And as I said before, this is not a trial and I am not an expert on the stand. I don't want to spend that much brain power on something like this. I'm not insinuating anything. I'm not trying to half say anything. I absentmindedly used that link to convey this story. Just like how my leg is on my coffee table right now. I'm not trying to give any hidden meaning behind me having one foot on the coffee table. I don't know what else to say about this.


 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		