Epstein, Epstein, Epstein . . . but don't give up

[rareboy]

​

 

[KaraBulut]

Once upon a time, Blondi's DOJ put out a statement that they had been through all of the Epstein documents and that there was nothing to see. Nothing. Nyet. Nada.

And today...

DOJ says it could take 'a few more weeks' to process Epstein files after receiving more than 1 million additional docs

The Justice Department said the FBI and the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York have uncovered more documents potentially related to Jeffrey Epstein's case.

www.nbcnews.com

DOJ says it could take 'a few more weeks' to process Epstein files after receiving more than 1 million additional docs
The Justice Department said the FBI and the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York have uncovered more documents potentially related to Jeffrey Epstein's case.

The Justice Department said Wednesday that it's received a new tranche of records — more than 1 million documents — "potentially" related to Jeffrey Epstein's case, requiring additional time to process them before release.

The DOJ said it "may take a few more weeks" to review the files produced by the FBI and the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.

"The US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and the FBI have informed the Department of Justice that they have uncovered over a million more documents potentially related to the Jeffrey Epstein case," the Justice Department said on its X account Wednesday afternoon.

How does one "find" one million more documents during the holidays?

 

[rareboy]

The worrisome thing is the volume...and the 'potentially' caveat.

But after all the most fervent denials that the docs existed, that they were on Bondi's desk, etc....this is suspect.

Question though...were all these files also with the DoJ during the Biden Admin?

 

[KaraBulut]

The worrisome thing is the volume...and the 'potentially' caveat.

But after all the most fervent denials that the docs existed, that they were on Bondi's desk, etc....this is suspect.

Question though...were all these files also with the DoJ during the Biden Admin?

This is one the messes with this case- there were at least 4 different prosecution teams.

This mess started in 2005, when the mother of a 14 year old girl notified the police that her daughter had been molested by a wealthy man named Jeffrey Epstein. The original indictment was from Palm Beach County in 2006. The Palm Beach County investigation led to multiple women coming forward and saying they had been molested or raped by Epstein. The women, and their families complained that they were being harassed by private investigators hired by Epstein. The Attorney General for Florida ignores the complaints and never charged Epstein with witness tampering and harassment. Epstein also hired, as an attorney, the husband of the police investigator for the Epstein legal team, which forces the investigator to recuse herself.

In 2006, the FBI gets involved because of accusations that Epstein took the women across State lines and out of the country. This creates another case file. This is where the first plea deal is reached where the Florida US Attorney (part of the Bush Administration) allows Epstein to make a plea deal for lesser State charges and a mild sentence. The victims are never notified of this plea deal before it is signed. By 2009, Epstein is a free man.

Years later, a reporter from The Miami Herald hears about the story and interviews the women who had been trafficked. She publishes articles about the case which resurrects it, especially since the abuses did not stop after Epstein was released in 2009.

Then years later, in 2019, during the first Trump Reich, the Southern District of NY US Attorney indicts Epstein on sex trafficking charges. This is the third case file. He is arrested in July. A month later, Epstein is found dead in his prison cell. In 2020, Ghislaine Maxwell is indicted by the Southern District.

Bill Barr, the Attorney General gets involved and Acosta resigns as Labor Secretary. This creates another file in Washington DC.

So, this is 16 years of investigations, 3 different offices and at least 4 case files. Because there is at least 3 grand juries and 2 convictions, there's plenty of evidence.

They have had plenty of years to review these files. The whole story with "the file" being on Pam Bondi's desk was bullshit from the very beginning.

 

[rareboy]

Remember when all the Epstein files fit in one binder that Bondi shared with the far right bloggers?

 

[Kulindahr]

 

[KaraBulut]

The visual image of 5.2 million documents sitting on Blondi's desk is amusing but it makes apparent that the government knew a lot about Epstein before they first let him get away with a slap on the wrist during the Bush Administration and then allowed him to commit "suicide" in jail during the first Trump Reich.

US DOJ to review 5.2 million pages of Epstein files, document shows

The Justice Department needs 400 lawyers from four different department offices to help with the process through late January.

www.reuters.com

US DOJ to review 5.2 million pages of Epstein files, document shows

The U.S. Justice Department revealed it has 5.2 million pages of Epstein files left to review and needs 400 lawyers from four different department offices to help with the process through late January, according to a government document reviewed by Reuters on Tuesday.
This is likely to extend the final release of the documents to much later than expected after a December 19 deadline set by Congress, the document said.

The Trump White House likely leaked this story to the Murdoch outlets, thinking that they would get favorable coverage that Trump dumped Epstein when Epstein propositioned a Mar-A-Lago employee. What the White House didn't anticipate was that the WSJ would dig into the story deeper.

Epstein not a member of Mar-A-Lago, but he was allowed to have Mar-A-Lago employees go to his private home in Palm Beach to give him massages, do his nails and provide other spa services in Epstein's residence. This went on for years, with spa employees warning each other about Epstein's advances and inappropriate behavior.

It wasn't until a spa employee put their concerns into writing and faxed it to the Trump Organization office that the at-home services stopped. This was two years before Epstein was indicted by Palm Beach police for sexually assaulting a 14 year old girl.

Mar-A-Lago staff and the Trump Organization never reported any of their concerns to police. It appears that the entire matter was covered-up by Trump.

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/trump-epstein-mar-a-lago-ban-2011dc53

The Incident That Prompted Trump to Ban Epstein From Mar-a-Lago’s Spa
Mar-a-Lago sent an 18-year-old spa worker on a house call to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. She complained to her bosses that Epstein pressured her for sex.

Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a frequent visitor to Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The club was also sending spa employees—usually young women—to Epstein’s nearby mansion for massages, manicures, and other spa services, according to former Mar-A-Lago and Epstein employees.

Trump Hit by New Bombshell Account of Twisted Ties to Epstein

Mar-a-Lago funneled young women to him for massages—even though he exposed himself, say ex-staff.

www.thedailybeast.com

Trump Hit by New Bombshell Account of Twisted Ties to Epstein

Shock incident that prompted Trump to BAN Epstein from Mar-a-Lago is revealed

DONALD Trump banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after a teenage employee made accusations against the paedophile, sources claim. An 18-year-old beautician complained to her managers about Epste…

www.thesun.co.uk

Shock incident that prompted Trump to BAN Epstein from Mar-a-Lago is revealed

DONALD Trump banned Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after a teenage employee made accusations against the paedophile, sources claim. An 18-year-old beautician complained to her managers about Epste…

www.thesun.ie

BEAST BARRED Shocking incident that prompted Donald Trump to BAN Jeffrey Epstein from Mar-a-Lago is revealed for first time

Epstein's behaviour during visits was a regular and well documented issue among staff, ex-employees claims

Marla Maples warned Trump something was "off" about Epstein: Report

New investigation says Trump’s then-wife Marla Maples raised concerns about Epstein years before Trump barred him from Mar-a-Lago.

www.newsweek.com

Marla Maples Warned Trump Something Was ‘Off’ About Epstein: Report

A Wall Street Journal investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein’s time around Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club says Trump’s then wife Marla Maples raised concerns about Epstein years before a 2003 complaint by a teenage spa worker purportedly prompted Trump to ban Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell from the club.

The Journal reports that Maples, who married Trump in 1993, “widely shared” misgivings with staff soon after Mar-a-Lago opened in 1995—telling employees something about Epstein was “wrong” and “off,” and that she worried about his influence on Trump. Former employees said Maples also communicated that she didn’t want to spend time with Epstein and didn’t want Trump to either.

 

[Alistair]

 

[cityboy-stl]

 

[KaraBulut]

The heat is on...

Judge demands response after lawmakers accuse DOJ of dragging feet with Epstein files

Meanwhile, another federal judge is urging prosecutors to prioritize more pressing cases. “Epstein is dead,” she said Tuesday.

www.courthousenews.com

Judge demands response after lawmakers accuse DOJ of dragging feet with Epstein files

Meanwhile, another federal judge is urging prosecutors to prioritize more pressing cases. “Epstein is dead,” she said Tuesday.

A federal judge in New York is demanding answers from the Justice Department after a pair of U.S. congressmen accused prosecutors of slow-rolling the release of files relating to late sex predator Jeffrey Epstein...

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer — the Barack Obama appointee in charge of Maxwell’s case — gave the Justice Department until Friday to respond to the lawmakers’ claims. Engelmayer said the government’s response should include discussion on whether the representatives have standing to intervene in Maxwell’s case and whether the court has the authority to rule on the Trump administration’s compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The DOJ has had so many attorneys quit or get fired for their involvement with Trump's prosecutions that the number of DOJ employees who are tied up with the Epstein documents review, that it is impacting active cases in the court system. Judges are getting irritated with the slow pace of active cases in the Federal Courts.

The tall task is already seeping into other cases. On Tuesday, another federal judge in the Southern District of New York told prosecutors to hold off of the Epstein assignment to focus on another marquee sex crime prosecution: the case of Oren, Alon and Tal Alexander — a trio of wealthy brothers in real estate accused of using their status to rape and traffic dozens of women.

With that case set to head to trial later this month, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni told prosecutors that they need to focus on expeditiously sending over discovery materials.

“A few people can be strung from the Epstein case given that these people are on trial,” said the Obama appointee. “Epstein is dead.”

 

[KaraBulut]

TLDR: The Trump Administration protects purveyors of child porn... especially the rich ones who donate money to the Republican Party.

Opinion | State Dept. tries to shield X from British probe into AI porn scandal

The U.S. is threatening to come to the aid of Elon Musk’s social media platform amid backlash to a new feature that has allowed users to generate AI pornography, including images of children.

www.ms.now

The Trump administration is trying to pressure the United Kingdom not to take action against Elon Musk’s social media platform in the wake of a scandal involving artificial intelligence-generated pornography.

A State Department official on Monday issued a vague warning to officials in the U.K. not to place any restrictions on Musk’s social media platform, X, after it unveiled a feature that allowed the platform’s AI chatbot, Grok, to generate nonconsensual pornography, including pornographic images of children.

In an interview with London-based GB News that aired Tuesday, State Department Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy Sarah Rogers said that “nothing is off the table when it comes to free speech,” framing the probe by the British media regulator, Ofcom, into nonconsensual pornography on X as some sort of infringement on democratic first principles.

 

[rareboy]

The US really does need to back the duck out of other countries' business with Xitter.

It is like reading the finger wagging admonishments from RFK jr to Germany about healthcare...downright insulting when it is coming from a country with limited access, the highest case cost, declining legth of life, restrictions on reproductive health, a rampaging campign against trans health, staggeringly high deaths from COVID, etc. etc. etc.

Like seriously folks. Maybe the US should just sit the fuck down and be quiet for a change.

Particularly since it is all 'America First' and not being the world's policeman.

 

[smokeshadow]

TLDR: The Trump Administration protects purveyors of child porn... especially the rich ones who donate money to the Republican Party.

Opinion | State Dept. tries to shield X from British probe into AI porn scandal

The U.S. is threatening to come to the aid of Elon Musk’s social media platform amid backlash to a new feature that has allowed users to generate AI pornography, including images of children.

www.ms.now

Sorry, Kara; but, I read your headline several times before realizing it wasn't reading TDLR. That's the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulations that oversees professional licensing for doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers, plumbers, electricians, etc. for the state of Texas. Doesn't have anything to do with the Donald's administration. I think I need to read slower

 

[KaraBulut]

Update on the South African revenge porn and child porn purveyor:

Step 1: Press reports from women who say that Grok was used to create deepfake nudes of them.

‘I feel violated and dehumanised after X’s Grok AI stripped me naked’

Women say ‘objectifying’ pictures are being created of them without their consent – and accuse tech companies like Elon Musk’s as well as the government of not doing enough to protect them

www.the-independent.com

‘I feel violated and dehumanised after X’s Grok AI stripped me naked’

Women say ‘objectifying’ pictures are being created of them without their consent – and accuse tech companies like Elon Musk’s as well as the government of not doing enough to protect them

Women say they have been left feeling “violated and humiliated” after “dehumanising” images of them have been created by users of Grok AI without their consent.

The pictures, created by X’s in-built artificial intelligence, have seen users’ clothes entirely digitally removed, or partially, such as being put in a bikini; with their body parts digitally altered, including their breasts being enlarged; and placed in sexualised contexts by Grok.

Evie, 22, who did not wish to share her surname, said she has been bombarded with more than 100 sexualised images of herself in less than a week, including one that digitally stripped her naked.

“I just feel like I’ve been violated,” she told The Independent. “I’m just so shocked there are people out there who can do this – and that there are so many people who will defend it and come up with excuses for this when it’s blatantly a huge violation.”

Step 2: Press reports that Grok is being used to produce nude images of minors (aka CSAM):

Grok chatbot allowed users to create digitally altered photos of minors in "minimal clothing"

Grok, the chatbot developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said it is fixing "lapses in safeguards" after social media users said it was generating sexualized photos of minors.

www.cbsnews.com

Grok chatbot allowed users to create digitally altered photos of minors in "minimal clothing"

Elon Musk's Grok, the chatbot developed by his company xAI, acknowledged "lapses in safeguards" on the AI platform that allowed users to generate digitally altered, sexualized photos of minors.

Step 3: Musk denies any knowledge and implies that It never happened.

https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5689660-xai-investigation-nonconsensual-images/

Musk says he’s not aware of any Grok-generated ‘naked underage images’

Step 4: The backlash begins, Musk doubles down: "Legacy Media Lies".

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/02/musk-grok-ai-bot-safeguard-sexualized-images-children.html

Musk’s xAI faces backlash after Grok generates sexualized images of children on X

• Elon Musk’s xAI faced backlash for recent Grok chatbot posts of artificial intelligence-generated sexualized images of children on X.
• The company responded to a request for comment with an autoreply: “Legacy Media Lies.”
• The proliferation of AI image-generating platforms since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022 has raised concerns over content manipulation and online safety.

Step 5: Congress does nothing. Democratic States begin to investigate.

California Launches Investigation Into Grok's Nonconsensual Sexual Images

The AG said that "the avalanche of reports detailing the non-consensual, sexually explicit material that xAI has produced" is shocking.

gizmodo.com

California Launches Investigation Into Grok’s Nonconsensual Sexual Images
The AG said that "the avalanche of reports detailing the non-consensual, sexually explicit material that xAI has produced" is shocking.

Step 6: Foreign countries announce that they are going to investigate Musk and Grok for violating their laws.

Britain To Ban Grok 'Nudify' Images. Here’s What We Know

Britain announced it would pass a law banning the creation of sexualized nonconsensual AI images.

time.com

U.K. Cracks Down on AI ‘Nudify’ Tech, Announces Investigation Into X
The United Kingdom plans to bring into force a law that criminalizes the creation of non-consensual sexualized images, including through Grok, the chatbot within Elon Musk’s X application, following the app’s deepfake scandal of the last few weeks.

“This means individuals are committing a criminal offence if they create—or seek to create—such content—including on X—and anyone who does this should expect to face the full extent of the law,” Technology Secretary Liz Kendal announced in the House of Commons Monday, adding that the government would work to also make it illegal for companies to supply the tools designed to create these nonconsensual images.

Step 7: The US threatens countries that dare to investigate Musk and becomes part of the cover-up. *cough Epstein cough*

Step 8: Musk announces that Grok has been reprogrammed and the porn [never] created by Grok won't happen again. X focuses on the "bikinis" and not upon the CSAM that Grok has created.

https://www.techspot.com/news/110937-x-has-blocked-grok-editing-images-real-people.html

X says it has blocked Grok from editing images of real people into revealing clothing
Reports suggest otherwise

What just happened? X has announced that Grok's ability to edit images of real people into revealing clothing such as bikinis has been removed – even for paying subscribers. But there are reports of this restriction being simple to bypass.

"We have implemented technological measures to prevent the Grok account from allowing the editing of images of real people in revealing clothing such as bikinis. This restriction applies to all users, including paid subscribers," wrote the @safety account on X.

But the undressing will only be prevented in places where it is illegal.

Grok blocked from undressing images in places where it's illegal, X says

Elon Musk’s X says its AI chatbot Grok won't be able to edit photos of real people in revealing clothing in places where that is illegal.

apnews.com

Grok blocked from undressing images in places where it’s illegal, X says

Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok won’t be able to edit photos to portray real people in revealing clothing in places where that is illegal, according to a statement posted on X.

 

[rareboy]

The files are now a full month overdue. Where is the media and Congressional outrage over this? Oh right...

 

[cityboy-stl]

It is time to start talking about Sascha Riley.

 

[Alistair]

 

[frankfrank]

G O P

Guardians
Of
Pedophiles.

 

[unloadonme]

It appears that Ghislaine Maxwell has agreed to testify under oath to a congressional committee. The news report talks about the Fifth Amendment and doesn't make clear whether any deal about legal immunity has been agreed.

Ghislaine Maxwell to testify before Congress in Epstein probe

The convicted sex trafficker has previously said she would decline to answer questions unless she is granted immunity.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[rareboy]