The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Explaining the Narcissistic Rage of the Left

The original point of this thread was to point out the hypocrisy of the left, as they are trying to overrule the election because, beyond all comprehension, they lost. They are declaring war on anyone and everyone who doesn't support their agenda, and it it ruining the country. The war on women, the war on minorities, the war on immigrants, the war on Russians, the war on guns, and now, because of Las Vegas, the war on white males. I'm guessing that if the left throw enough shit against the wall, eventually something's gotta stick, but nothing has yet.

But I also think that the conflicts are totally intentional as there is a lot of $$ being made in the turmoil. Just follow the money and see where it leads. I am just so sad that some people just refuse to see the big picture.

Their are trillions of dollars at stake because, inconceivably, Hilary lost. That is a fact. $$ rules America now.
 
mikey3000 said:
The original point of this thread was to point out the hypocrisy of the left, as they are trying to overrule the election because, beyond all comprehension, they lost. They are declaring war on anyone and everyone who doesn't support their agenda, and it it ruining the country. The war on women, the war on minorities, the war on immigrants, the war on Russians, the war on guns, and now, because of Las Vegas, the war on white males. I'm guessing that if the left throw enough shit against the wall, eventually something's gotta stick, but nothing has yet.

But I also think that the conflicts are totally intentional as there is a lot of $$ being made in the turmoil. Just follow the money and see where it leads. I am just so sad that some people just refuse to see the big picture.

Their are trillions of dollars at stake because, inconceivably, Hilary lost. That is a fact. $$ rules America now.
Click to expand...

I might be wrong about this, but aren't you of Russian or Ukrainian heritage?



also as far as Clinton's losing the election, it remains to be seen if it was a fair loss or not...we'll have to wait and see what the Mueller investigation comes up with



Just follow the money and see where it leads.
Click to expand...

I understand Mueller's doing just that
 
mikey3000 said:
The original point of this thread was to point out the hypocrisy of the left, as they are trying to overrule the election because, beyond all comprehension, they lost. They are declaring war on anyone and everyone who doesn't support their agenda, and it it ruining the country. The war on women, the war on minorities, the war on immigrants, the war on Russians, the war on guns, and now, because of Las Vegas, the war on white males. I'm guessing that if the left throw enough shit against the wall, eventually something's gotta stick, but nothing has yet.

But I also think that the conflicts are totally intentional as there is a lot of $$ being made in the turmoil. Just follow the money and see where it leads. I am just so sad that some people just refuse to see the big picture.

Their are trillions of dollars at stake because, inconceivably, Hilary lost. That is a fact. $$ rules America now.
Click to expand...

This post doesn't even make the least bit of sense. Put down the bong.
 
Could you explain in greater detail how you feel the left is being hypocritical. What exactly are they doing that contradicts their values?

I actually do see some hypocrisy, but I don't think it's what you're seeing.

What is the big picture that you're seeing? What you're stating about the conflicts being totally intentional (manufactured?) sounds very conspiratorial. That would have to be one massive conspiracy and it becomes harder to maintain a conspiracy the more people are involved because there are more potential sources for a leak. We'd either have to have a mostly centralized conspiracy or several independent conspiracies that have all found some way to make their conflict into a commodity. Where does financial gain come into the picture?
 
^ You should know that the OP actually does believe in all these conspiracies. One suspects that there is a huge bulletin board next to the computer area...covered in pictures and documents connected with red string.
 
mikey3000 said:
The original point of this thread was to point out the hypocrisy of the left, as they are trying to overrule the election because, beyond all comprehension, they lost. They are declaring war on anyone and everyone who doesn't support their agenda, and it it ruining the country. The war on women, the war on minorities, the war on immigrants, the war on Russians, the war on guns, and now, because of Las Vegas, the war on white males. I'm guessing that if the left throw enough shit against the wall, eventually something's gotta stick, but nothing has yet.

But I also think that the conflicts are totally intentional as there is a lot of $$ being made in the turmoil. Just follow the money and see where it leads. I am just so sad that some people just refuse to see the big picture.

Their are trillions of dollars at stake because, inconceivably, Hilary lost. That is a fact. $$ rules America now.
Click to expand...

What is amusing is you don't see that the Right engages in the exact same hypocrisy and is really no different.
 
Stardreamer said:
What is amusing is you don't see that the Right engages in the exact same hypocrisy and is really no different.
Click to expand...

I believe that ANY one that does not keep their campaign promises is a hypocrite. I believe the left and right are guilty.
 
mikey3000 said:
That's right. Ignore the facts and blame everyone else. Typical liberal. Just like how the left squaked when Trump said , "wait and see" if hell accept the results of the election. You guys have been shitting your pants for almost a year now, ever since your queen's defeat. So much for the smooth transition of power, eh? Yup.
Click to expand...

Interesting that you buy into the same fallacy so common among political enthusiasts, automatically labeling everyone who disagrees with you as a follower of the one you most despise. If you're paying attention at all here, it should be obvious by now that there are people who can't stand Clinton but still see the reality of Russia's meddling.
 
mikey3000 said:
And the best part is, the left is sniveling how Russia tried to sway the election via Face Book ads. Well, who sold the ads to Russia? Wait till Zuckerberg runs in 2020. LOL! And didn't ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Hollywood, Broadway, The View, Ellen, Robert De Nero, and every other person with some sort of 'platform' try to influence the election? Doesn't America influence foreign elections? But, man, you guys fall for the lies hook, line and sinker.
Click to expand...

Ah, how nicely you embrace foreigners meddling in our Republic by employing the "Everybody does it" fallacy. Someone who believed in liberty would be condemning the Russians and America for meddling in other countries' elections.
 
mikey3000 said:
The original point of this thread was to point out the hypocrisy of the left, as they are trying to overrule the election because, beyond all comprehension, they lost.
Click to expand...

There's far more to it than that. I have neighbors who are die-hard Democrats, Greens, and one actual communist, and they would have had no serious issue with, say, President Susan Collins, if she'd run, or with Christie if he'd made it to the general election. It isn't just that they lost, it's what some of my Republican neighbors are starting to see: they got a loose cannon for president.
 
ballcaphair said:
The employment rate is at a 16 year low and I know the hurricanes are a big part of this. The economy and employment should be able to withstand foul weather. We do not have our footing on solid ground.
Click to expand...

I've lost much faith in the reports of employment rates since they've changed the definitions. It ought to take into account people who would like to be working but have lost the energy to keep grinding away at finding something, but it doesn't -- so what does it really mean?
 
Kulindahr said:
I've lost much faith in the reports of employment rates since they've changed the definitions. It ought to take into account people who would like to be working but have lost the energy to keep grinding away at finding something, but it doesn't -- so what does it really mean?
Click to expand...

I agree. It means nothing, but better footing would give us a clearer view. It does mean nothing and you and I know it will be spun from both sides.
 
Kulindahr said:
There's far more to it than that. I have neighbors who are die-hard Democrats, Greens, and one actual communist, and they would have had no serious issue with, say, President Susan Collins, if she'd run, or with Christie if he'd made it to the general election. It isn't just that they lost, it's what some of my Republican neighbors are starting to see: they got a loose cannon for president.
Click to expand...

That is more in line with this: If you prefer the Republican or the Democratic Party, and the party you normally do not favor wins, who would you be okay with?

Due to the fact that many people are sick to damn death of endless wars, the Republican who can win crossover voters in a general election—but evidently cannot do it in his own party—is the junior United States senator for Kentucky, Rand Paul.
 
Kulindahr said:
We're finally getting far enough from the election that Trump has some minimal claim to have influenced the economy; calling it "Trump's economy" is without foundation at this point.
Click to expand...

The rule is the pres will be blamed for every thing that happens while he is in office, so he claims the credit as well. Sorry I did not invent the system, that is the way it has always been.
 
Benvolio said:
The rule is the pres will be blamed for every thing that happens while he is in office, so he claims the credit as well. Sorry I did not invent the system, that is the way it has always been.
Click to expand...

The system is usually casts blame aside during times of war. The present war, under both parties, is decades old. My friends did not die for "the way it's always been." They died defending the country and freedom of speech. That we use it in such a petty way is shameful. just sayin' and prayin'
 
Benvolio said:
The rule is the pres will be blamed for every thing that happens while he is in office, so he claims the credit as well. Sorry I did not invent the system, that is the way it has always been.
Click to expand...

But this one takes credit for things he did not do while refusing to take responsibility for the things he DOES do.

The buck does not stop at his desk. If it's a good thing, he puts it in his pocket. If it's a bad thing, he passes it to someone else, and so far, the 'passed bucks' far out-number the ones he puts in his pocket.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top