The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Facts & Fictions About Cut & Uncut Cocks

Lol...are you for real?:rolleyes: Open brain surgery is done with general anaesthesia, and it is done to correct very, very serious conditions, like aneurisms, epileptic seizures, necrosis or edema of brain tissue or to remove tumors. This is completely different from male genital mutilation, which not only is not an issue of life and death, but actually increases the risk of developing all the conditions that it supposedly cures.

Yes. I am for real.

You know, I know a few guys who've needed to have their foreskins lopped off late in life because they have picked up an issue or two which needed that severe a treatment. We call that "knob-rot" in my neck of the woods.

I know of no cut guys who have needed anything similar. That, in my book, says a great deal.

What a poor analogy. You had an injury that required treatment. Male genital mutilation, conversely, is not necessary at all. In fact, it is an injury and at least a few infants have bled to death due to it.

Nope. The point is a baby or child crying does not mean that its world is ending. Of course, a few infants have bled to death from the procedure, but undoubtedly a few have died from complications of conditions contracted which would have been minimised had circumcision been performed. Refer to my knob-rot comment above.

Yes, but there is crying and then there's crying. Infants who udergo male genital mutilation show dramatic increases in systolic blood pressure, blood glucocorticoid levels and often slip into a comatose state that lasts for up to three days after the excision. Do infants show dramatic increases in systolic blood pressure and glucocorticoid levels when they are hugry, feeling too cold or warm? No. So your argument is pathetic. Sorry. Try again...|

Really? How often?

If that were indeed the case in the millions of children snipped every year in countries all over the planet, I'm sure there would be much more of a fuss than there has been. So why don't you try again - start with providing a few stats, hmmm? Incidentally, I think changes in blood pressure are routine with changes in temperature - you can google it, if you like.

Nobody denies that a baby feels a bit of pain. However, I don't remember it, if I did feel it. I do remember when my thumb was ripped off, though - that was pain. Those of us who were done are usually not opposed to it, nor do we feel "mutilated." Shouldn't that count for something?

Yawn...appeal from authority doesen't work with me, sport. Especially since the conclusion of the experts does not correlate with empirical data. And by the way, it tells me that something is wrong when only the "experts" from a single nationality finds a certain result, which disagrees with all the experts from other nations. Encouraging male genital mutilation is an American thing, and not an "expert" thing.

Yeah... about that... a little place we like to call The Middle East, encompassing many Arabic nations (some not even 5th world shitholes, surprisingly, as someone so thoughtfully phrased it) and also that Israel place. And north and southern Africa as well. Somewhat more than one nationality, I think you'll find.

As for your conspiracy theory about the medical journals being produced by pharmaceutical companies, who do you think stands to gain from this? The company which produces the new circumcision pills?

-d-
 
1. That video was horrifying. I'm SO glad my parents didn't mutilate me.

2. HandsomeAsshole: Thumbs up. Reason gets 'em every time. ..|

3. It's the BOY'S BODY, not the PARENT'S, the AMA'S or the DOCTOR'S. The only one who has a say in the matter is the BOY. If he wants to get it done, he can do so later in life, but the choice shouldn't be taken away from him before he can even say something about it. IT'S HIS BODY.
 
I can't speak for cut men, but I am uncut and find that my cock head is so sensitive I don't really like it being touched directly at first, for example in a blow job, I prefer the foreskin to cover the head, and as the blow job progresses, for the blowee to pull back the foreskin.

Also, I don't know whether uncut is more sensitive than cut, but I do know it feels nice to have your foreskin sucked and licked and all the rest, so either way I am glad I have one. But that doesn't mean cut guys are missing out. Obviously all guys like sex etc regardless; you know only what you have and that is all that matters.

By the way I have never had an infection, even when I don't shower for days. It may smell a little but not if you shower daily (or maybe I just don't notice).

I agree with the view that circumcision is mutilation. My view is that it is unnecessary unless it causes a problem (which it hasn't for me, and obviously millions of Europeans) and if someone wants to get circumcised, let them do it when they are old enough to decide, especially since circumcision on a baby can cause problems rather than prevent them as a baby's penis is not fully developed.
 
I am seeing a guy who recently had to be circumcised because of a very tight foreskin. He's been really depressed about it and worrying I won't like it (and him) now. We haven't been able to test it out because his stitches are still in, but it really makes no difference to me. He's also worried it won't function like it used to or feel good, so it's nice to see stories from guys who were circumcised as adults. His cock was actually hyper-sensitive, so a bit of sensation loss might not be the worst thing.

I can't speak for cut men, but I am uncut and find that my cock head is so sensitive I don't really like it being touched directly at first, for example in a blow job, I prefer the foreskin to cover the head, and as the blow job progresses, for the blowee to pull back the foreskin.

I have the same problem and have also discovered that it is much better when the skin is not pulled back. I have honestly almost never enjoyed receiving a blowjob at least until I had a guy try it like that. Man, I'm glad I'm not alone in having this issue!
 
After I was born, my parents argued for 5 days about my circumcision; mom wanted me cut and dad au natural. The fifth day, they finally agreed upon a partial circumcision; I know weird, but such is my life.

Any who, I'm 26 now, and here is the result.
 

Attachments

  • Before shower.jpg
    Before shower.jpg
    26.7 KB · Views: 457
wow this thread is...kinda something..i dont kno wat to say..lol but oh well.
 
After I was born, my parents argued for 5 days about my circumcision; mom wanted me cut and dad au natural. The fifth day, they finally agreed upon a partial circumcision; I know weird, but such is my life.

Any who, I'm 26 now, and here is the result.

I am fascinated a partial circumcision. I know this is a bit forward but would you post a close up.
 
Uncut natural cock means havin to clean more due to layer of skin..so i insist on any guy who is that they are clean. I much prefer uncut as cut is mutilated.. theres scarring and its odd looking, aesthetically unpleasing, its unnatural and is numbed and less sensitive. I cringe when i see a guy move his hand back and forth jerking off an cut cock as that would be hyper sensitive for a uncut who has greater feeling and orgasm.

Natural vs Mutilated... Natural wins. :D
 
I much rather prefer cut. It's almost to the point where'd if I was in bed with a guy and discovered he was uncut, I'd probably leave.
No offence to those of you who are still intact, I just find it... odd looking, and somewhat gross.
 
i think cut is not natural! Its a nonsense, leave what nature has given!
 
I'm uncut, and wish my BF was. I really like sucking on uncut cock, and slipping my tongue under the skin to lick the head. the foreskin just gives you more to play with
 
Being cut and not by my choice. I have cum to appreciate guys who are uncut with complete cock.

Love to to cruise the baths for guys who are uncut and enjoy the art of docking.

In to gay porn of uncut meat.
 
Let me start:

I'm uncut and i've read that cut cocks are more numb or less sensitive due to the lack of a foreskin. The cut cock develops a natural protection which causes the numbness or decreasing sensitivity, which means that guys with cut cocks...

1) feel less in sex
2) can fuck longer
3) can't cum hard

Is there any truth in this?

All definitely true and increase with age. A cut dick might seem OK at 18 but at 35 it is way less sensitive than an uncut guy of the same age.
 
Let me start:

I'm uncut and i've read that cut cocks are more numb or less sensitive due to the lack of a foreskin. The cut cock develops a natural protection which causes the numbness or decreasing sensitivity, which means that guys with cut cocks...

1) feel less in sex
2) can fuck longer
3) can't cum hard

Is there any truth in this?

well to tell you something, my father had a foreskin until he was in his early thirties, unfortunately he had an accident which severed the foreskin so he had to get it circumcised, then when each of his sons were born he had all of us cut, my dad said that he has had more sensitivity to his penis than before he had a foreskin, so he has had two worlds of being cut and uncut. i can't argue with that, I suppose it can only be told once someone has had the fortune to have both to actually really know, the pleasures of sensation.
 
Uncut natural cock means havin to clean more due to layer of skin..so i insist on any guy who is that they are clean. I much prefer uncut as cut is mutilated.. theres scarring and its odd looking, aesthetically unpleasing, its unnatural and is numbed and less sensitive. I cringe when i see a guy move his hand back and forth jerking off an cut cock as that would be hyper sensitive for a uncut who has greater feeling and orgasm.

Natural vs Mutilated... Natural wins. :D

in the end the erect penis is all the same whether cut or uncut.
 
I'm cut and I'm okay with that. I'm glad my parents decided to do that when I was too young to remember. That's just me though. I guess it would be nice to have foreskin for like a week. Just so that I could know how it is. Or something.

I don't think that there's probably any real difference as far as feeling goes though. Those of you with foreskin, when you orgasm, do you feel it in your foreskin?
 
I'm kind of interested now. Do you feel it in your foreskin? Should I grow myself a foreskin? I can grow a foreskin, you know.
 
Uncut here the only reason people are cut at all is that it was and in some cases is a religious practice.

I find it abhor-able. It always has amazed me that these deeply religious Jews and Muslims thought that God got it wrong no child should be circumcised until and if they want at18. And yes it may have been for hygiene I believe it was no different than what some African people do to there women's clitoris.
 
Back
Top