- Joined
- Dec 25, 2005
- Posts
- 22,224
- Reaction score
- 110
- Points
- 63
The high-rise "shortcut" to throwing him under the passing bus?Comey ought to be fired.
But once Hillary is president...she can just have him defenestrated.
To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
The high-rise "shortcut" to throwing him under the passing bus?Comey ought to be fired.
But once Hillary is president...she can just have him defenestrated.
At least he is not dead and lying in a park somewhere. Yet.
At least he is not dead and lying in a park somewhere. Yet.
^ Well, as the saying goes, "If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, baffle them with your bullshit."
In that, Trump has succeeded.
Yet they were important enough for the FBI to re-open the investigation. Hmmm, must be some pretty sensitive material for/from Huma.
Did the combination of Russian and F.B.I. intervention swing the election? Yes. Mrs. Clinton lost three states – Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania – by less than a percentage point, and Florida by only slightly more. If she had won any three of those states, she would be president-elect. Is there any reasonable doubt that Putin/Comey made the difference?
Comey is American citizen so he should be investigated and maybe charged for political interference.
Putin, you can't do anything about.
He should be investigated to find out why Hillary was not indicted, after they found she had broken the law by treating classified info "extremely carelessly". Who ever pressured him not to prosecute should be exposed.
Where is "political interference" a crime? He and his superiors are probably protected by prosecutorial discretion.
Yeah, maybe. Just like when the FBI concluded it's investigation of Kilary with her email server and found nothing, eh? Oh wait, that didn't happen either, or am I lying again?^
^ Indeed. He is claiming that Breasseale says that there is no evidence. There isn't... yet. Just because they haven't found it yet doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Mikey is in good company, claiming people say things that they don't say, and he doesn't realise that that is his lie.
When Breasseale concludes his investigation and finds nothing, Mikey can make that claim. Until that time, when he has actual proof, he will continue to lie by continuing this argument.

Yeah, maybe. Just like when the FBI concluded it's investigation of Kilary with her email server and found nothing, eh? Oh wait, that didn't happen either, or am I lying again?![]()
You know that happened. They did their investigation (twice), and when they found nothing, THEY STOPPED. Your DHS friend hasn't found anything YET, but HE HASN"T STOPPED. He hasn't concluded that there is NOTHING there.
That is not difficult to understand. You got caught in another like and you have no way out, so you make stupid statements and use silly emoticons to make your point. Here's a hint: They Don't.
Bullshit! The FBI found lots, twice, they just chose to not indict her because of the election.
Don't you have a TV ? I'll buy ya one if needed.
Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.
In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
Yeah, and Obama, the President and her huge supporter, had nothing to do with her not being indicted, eh?
http://observer.com/2016/06/obamas-latest-attempt-to-save-clinton-from-indictment/
C'mon man, give up. Americans learned the truth and THEY decided her fate at the polls. End of story. The FBI did their job.
If your opinion differs than the DNC, then why do you think she lost the election?
