The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Flip Flopper Bush: "I Was Against Stay the Course Before I was For It"

wow your so stupid if you actaully like democrats i mean i think england could be making the same mistake.

for example, egnlands best when its labour, but as some stupid people are starting to make labour look bad peopel are forgetting how the conservatives fucked england up before labour came in power.

and americans are goign to make a big mistake if they actaully do let democrats in, you need to look back in past and see why republicans got in in the first place.
 
Are conservatives in England different than the conservatives here? What do I know I'm just a good ole Texas boy.
 
You must be referring to Americans who constitute the richest 2% of our population.
They're the only ones (other than politicians and favored corporations) who have benifitted from Republican leadership.
 
Well i liek the realitionship England has with America thats wjy it bothers me. And yes it seems stupid how i like labour in our country but want conservative in america but thats how it works best. And calling people stupid doesnt make me look bad, if my arguments stupid that makes me look bad (i knwo some may think my argument stupid but thats what could make me look stupid, not calling others stupid)
 
sebbles said:
wow your so stupid if you actaully like democrats i mean i think england could be making the same mistake.

for example, egnlands best when its labour, but as some stupid people are starting to make labour look bad peopel are forgetting how the conservatives fucked england up before labour came in power.

and americans are goign to make a big mistake if they actaully do let democrats in, you need to look back in past and see why republicans got in in the first place.
Click to expand...


how can somebody who can't spell the name of their own country correctly call me stupid?? it's spelled e-n-g-l-a-n-d.


i know the history of our two parties...i'm a fan of history, political and otherwise. but thanks for your concern.
 
im not a good speller, but that was a typing error, it doesnt mean i dont knwo how to spell it.

i hope its made your life better by doing that :)

all you can do is make biased arguments on how bad replublicans are, if your so nterested in politics then youd know that its not a one sided thing.
 
sebbles said:
seriously you couldnt be so much fucking wrong!

you have a crazy conspirasy that Bush wants troops to fail! thats a conspiracy, oh sorry its not is it, its aloud of shit.

if we had people in charge who youd like well first if we had those people running england our economy would go down the drain, then in america if you choose to change sides youd end up keeping to yourselves and letting the world turn to shit. so stop acting like you know whats best and realise that democrats are infact have shit views.
Click to expand...

This, from a staunch defender of Paris Hilton. :rolleyes:

The ignore button might be called for. . .
 
to be honest i really have not one care in the world that some so narrowminded and biased would think of me.
 
exactly how old are you, emperor? from your avatar i would guess 400 years old.

as for you sebbles, when you graduate from kindergarten, you'll realize that a president has no right to attack a soverign country for NO REASON as bush did with iraq, has no right to lie about the reason, has no right to use the army of the most powerful country in the world as his personal little feifdom (like caesar, only dumber), has no right to use a horrible tragedy (9/11) as an excuse for said war when there is no link between 9/11 and iraq, has no right to kill 600,000 iraqis in the process (out of the 20 million...think about that for a second)...i could go on, but i've learned that logic doesn't penetrate the brain of the right-wing loonies on JUB.
 
sebbles said:
im not a good speller, but that was a typing error, it doesnt mean i dont knwo how to spell it.

i hope its made your life better by doing that :)

all you can do is make biased arguments on how bad replublicans are, if your so nterested in politics then youd know that its not a one sided thing.
Click to expand...


sorry...i don't mind bad spelling but your spelling is off the charts bad...it's making the synapses in my brain misfire :p
 
james1200 said:
exactly how old are you, emperor? from your avatar i would guess 400 years old.

as for you sebbles, when you graduate from kindergarten, you'll realize that a president has no right to attack a soverign country for NO REASON as bush did with iraq, has no right to lie about the reason, has no right to use the army of the most powerful country in the world as his personal little feifdom (like caesar, only dumber), has no right to use a horrible tragedy (9/11) as an excuse for said war when there is no link between 9/11 and iraq, has no right to kill 600,000 iraqis in the process (out of the 20 million...think about that for a second)...i could go on, but i've learned that logic doesn't penetrate the brain of the right-wing loonies on JUB.
Click to expand...

oh right your one fo those supporters of Saddam are you? he let terrorists in his country and killed lots of his people for no reason! And if you answer no to not bring a Saddam supporter then why do you thinkl its bad that Bush choose to get rid of him?
 
oh and james1200 i could be dislexic and your there just showing it up.
 
and theres you getting on your high horse saying the republicans are bad for apprently discriminating disabled people.
 
sebbles said:
oh right your one fo those supporters of Saddam are you? he let terrorists in his country and killed lots of his people for no reason! And if you answer no to not bring a Saddam supporter then why do you thinkl its bad that Bush choose to get rid of him?
Click to expand...

i can't figure out if you're young and naive or what...do you know how many horrible dictators there are in the world? are you saying we should go after all of them? you think we have the resources for that??? bush got rid of sadam and killed 600,00 people in the process and LIED about why...you can't do that sebbles. it's morally wrong and downright criminal. he also inflamed the whole region and things are now worse than ever...get a grip little boy and just stop...you're making all right-wing loons look bad with your ridiculous arguments.
 
Just because im young does not make me naive! Stop being agiest it really is not good for yourself!

Yes theres lots of bad people out there! And yes i think they need to be got rid of! But youd rather craw in your hole and forget about that. ITs not criminal to want to rid the world of dictators. By your argument England shouldnt have bothered starting the world war, i mean what am i thinking, we should have left Hitler to do what he wants because its not our country hes doing anything to! (by the way thats sarcasm)
 
england only got involved in WWII cause hitler was about to attack you...what the fuck are you talking about? read a fucking book and stop making yourself look like an ass.

and i don't see your butt in the military...why don't you go join instead of being an arm chair warrior einstein???
 
yeah what i actaully was meaing to ask because obviosuly i didnt make myself clear (as in i actaully mean that i wasnt clear enough)

Who should have got rid of Saddam Hussein?
 
NO ONE...god...i really wanna call you names right now but you're such a black hole where logic goes to die that it's pointless.

NO ONE had a right to attack Hussein...you don't have a right to attack a country that hasn't attacked you. do you understand that? hussein in fact, ran the only secular arab state in the region which was a good thing. now, the religious wackos are on the verge of taking over and as soon as they do, god help us and the entire arab world. also, by attacking iraq which NEVER even plotted to attack us, we've turned the entire region against us and created MORE terrorists. this, you see, is a BAD thing. VERY BAD.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top