Fox News Is Killing The Republican Party

[Centexfarmer]

Thinking Frum's tbd network is hurting Repubs has been posted

But for shits and giggles

Fox is not responsible for Republican positions

I'll agree with you on that. The National Republican Party Delegate are supposed to be responsible for their party position.

FOX NEWS and it's Corporate owners are only responsible for putting "the spin" on whatever might get Republicans elected.

So I agree with you.

and for anyone to think that a

That'd be Repub "leadership".

And here I was hoping that you wouldn't go there.

They're hand in glove with each other on the very point that I just made.

And they don't have that

Mitt was too soft and no one can stir the drink anything but bad

Fox maybe cheer leading and perhaps badly

I don't know. It just seemed like there was a credible moment when Karl Rove protested that Fox called Ohio too early, and he got called on it.

But they're not the reason

It would be nice if FOX NEWS found a different approach during the upcoming four years, than the one that didn't seem to work for either them OR their candidates/pundits during the last four.

 

[Jack Springer]

^^^

You forgot a little fact -- the rest of the media spins for the democrats.

Why pick on Fox News.

 

[Rolyo85]

Obviously the rest of the media does no such thing if their predictions are accurate. Or would you claim Fox was somehow correct?

 

[Centexfarmer]

^^^

You forgot a little fact -- the rest of the media spins for the democrats.

Why pick on Fox News.

Poor thang! Bless your heart!



If believing in "Liberal Media Bias" keeps you off the Ambien, and justified in the amount of money that you spend drinking California wine (most which is produced by ex hippie, tree huggers turned capitalist), who am I to burst that bubble?

I use to read US magazine too, but only because I thought US was about the United States, and I realized that we still live in a Democratic Republic where we're at least (partially) free to think and choose on our own.

 

[Kulindahr]

^^^

You forgot a little fact -- the rest of the media spins for the democrats.

Why pick on Fox News.

Jack, one of these days you really need to learn the difference between reality and political fairy tales. See, in reality, the LSM had just about as many negative stories about Obama as positive ones during the election cycle.

Not that right-wingers care about facts, but one feels a duty to keep trying.

 

[frankfrank]

MSNBC -- what can you say about a channel -- hard to call them a news channel when it's all opinion. They even have the same slogan as the Obama campaign had.

But they DON'T call themselves a news channel - MSNBC originally meant Microsoft/National Broadcasting Company. Pretty sure that Microsoft has nothing to do with them anymore, but they're still considered "an NBC network" - but in none of this nomenclature do you find the word "NEWS."

I assume it's now, still, called MSNBC (originally MS/NBC) because of brand recognition and nothing else.

Fox News, on the other hand, DOES have "News" in its name, but in prime time you can't tune in and see any actual NEWS there, anymore than you can on MSNBC.

 

[Centexfarmer]

But they DON'T call themselves a news channel - MSNBC originally meant Microsoft/National Broadcasting Company. Pretty sure that Microsoft has nothing to do with them anymore, but they're still considered "an NBC network" - but in none of this nomenclature do you find the word "NEWS."

I assume it's now, still, called MSNBC (originally MS/NBC) because of brand recognition and nothing else.

Fox News, on the other hand, DOES have "News" in its name, but in prime time you can't tune in and see any actual NEWS there, anymore than you can on MSNBC.

That's not all together true.

FOX NEWS doesn't separate their "Editorial Opinion" prgrams from their "News" lineup, and sometimes they claim that their "editorial opinion" is newsworthy.

Hence the distinction.

 

[rareboy]

^^^

You forgot a little fact -- the rest of the media spins for the democrats.

Why pick on Fox News.

Just like all the polls were 'skewed' for the Dems prior to the election.

Damn those polls for changing the outcome of the election, eh Jack?

 

[chance1]

But they DON'T call themselves a news channel - MSNBC originally meant Microsoft/National Broadcasting Company. Pretty sure that Microsoft has nothing to do with them anymore, but they're still considered "an NBC network" - but in none of this nomenclature do you find the word "NEWS."

I assume it's now, still, called MSNBC (originally MS/NBC) because of brand recognition and nothing else.

Fox News, on the other hand, DOES have "News" in its name, but in prime time you can't tune in and see any actual NEWS there, anymore than you can on MSNBC.

So it's "all in the name".

Lol

Really ?

More Animal Farm silliness squared

 

[Jack Springer]

Poor thang! Bless your heart!



If believing in "Liberal Media Bias" keeps you off the Ambien, and justified in the amount of money that you spend drinking California wine (most which is produced by ex hippie, tree huggers turned capitalist), who am I to burst that bubble?

I use to read US magazine too, but only because I thought US was about the United States, and I realized that we still live in a Democratic Republic where we're at least (partially) free to think and choose on our own.

OK, I'm done with you .... US Magazine? LOL

I suppose you still have your subscription to People.


PS: buy a new bucket, extra large this time

- - - Updated - - -

But they DON'T call themselves a news channel - MSNBC originally meant Microsoft/National Broadcasting Company. Pretty sure that Microsoft has nothing to do with them anymore, but they're still considered "an NBC network" - but in none of this nomenclature do you find the word "NEWS."

I assume it's now, still, called MSNBC (originally MS/NBC) because of brand recognition and nothing else.

Fox News, on the other hand, DOES have "News" in its name, but in prime time you can't tune in and see any actual NEWS there, anymore than you can on MSNBC.

You're serious, aren't you.

 

[Kulindahr]

So it's "all in the name".

Lol

Really ?

More Animal Farm silliness squared

F

He said exactly the opposite.

 

[Kulindahr]

You're serious, aren't you.

Of course he's serious. The point is that whether a channel claims to be news or not no longer makes a difference.

 

[Ninja108]

I guess Jack and Faux news must have missed how many newspapers were in Romney's corner this time around.