Is it an adult site?
I mean people are whining over not being able to use a couple curse words. Imagine having a vocabulary so small that this is a problem.
Of course, the rub is that the censorship is both arbitrary and isn't even representative of social standards in Britain, Canada, or America where the vast majority of posters and presumably lurkers live.
There seems to be no logic to why it is perfectly acceptable to say a woman is a shrew, but not acceptable to say he was bitching about his job, and the meaning obviously being that he referred to a woman who was shrewish.
Somehow, in the pretentious and rarefied air of not using the N word and all the histrionics of the supposed trauma that merely hearing it induces in the fragile, we're supposed to then beginning banning bad words that mean things that aren't nice. How ridiculous.
If the Jewish race can allow the words genocide and holocaust to be used and remind them of their near extinction while the world listened gayly to Tommy Dorsey, then all these other hypersensitivities seem quite like little Johnny pretending to be Napoleon and ordering about his playmates, as it surely doesn't change society, doesn't change attitudes, and doesn't apparently help race relations in an era in which it has all been ramped up to be the fashionable thing to wave about and pretend is the most meaningful thing people are talking about as they drink their Starbucks.
As for the presumed slight to women, who in their right mind would believe that using the term bitch to describe griping is tantamount to broadly declaring that all griping is feminine and anti-female, or that people using it mean to demean all women? It's absurd and should be challenged.
Are we then to forbid the use of hunk or stud to refer to men since it is blatantly objectifying and reducing men to breeders and disrespectful of intrinsic worth of males aside from being sperm delivering units? The irony of doing so on a site that earns its money from the objectification of men is stunning.
How very unintelligent, and I suspect Cormac's real reason for stirring the pot is a protest against such ill-conceived "reasoning."
As for it being a private website, that isn't enough to ask everyone to park their brains at the door and just come in with their dicks out, is it?
Just as with the banishment of the racial epithet, the banishment of sexist terms is a nannymongering that can't be bothered to simply read the word to see if it is used to insult another or to merely be a colorful figure of speech in rap, or gay slang, or similar. Lumping them all together as "sin" is an oafish and ham-handed mistake.
The forum is about ideas and language, even if most times reduced to tweet-lengths, but expression still matters.