The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Some things to know about this forum:
    If you're new, please read the Posting Guidelines. Banned content is in "List of Content Never Allowed on JUB".
    The most important thing to know: images of persons under 18 years old are never allowed here. If you cannot verify that the person in the picture is 18 years or older, don't post it.

Fuck Him Bareback

Whats hotter bareback porn or condom porn?

  • Bareback

    Votes: 143 80.3%
  • Condom

    Votes: 35 19.7%

  • Total voters
    178
  • Poll closed .
Alas, and back to topic, Brent has done Barback movies so you'd NEVER see him on Fratmen.

sorry.
 
I don't mind watching bareback but i do not support dangerous practices.

Also fisting is a turn off.
 
Porn films with bareback should have warning labels saying something like:
WARNING: IF U DO BAREBACKS U WILL GET AIDS/HIV.
 
Alas, and back to topic, Brent has done Barback movies so you'd NEVER see him on Fratmen.

sorry.

I wasn't actually suggesting that you use him.

He's working for Falcon, which I think means he's got a clean bill of health. I'm assuming they use state of the art testing. I could be mistaken, though.

Soil, I realize that you have very mixed feelings about BC, and they are entirely justified. However, I'm still inclined to see him as an exploited kid, who saw his tush as his only ticket out of a dreadful family situ. In many ways, BC's the archetype for models who are 'cherry picked' to do bareback porn.

Perhaps having regular guy friends his own age, like the Fratmen, might teach him that being a manipulative prick isn't the only way to get ahead in this life.
 
Because you're talking about my friends and my co-workers and young men that I'm partially responsible for.

you realize that those porn stars are real people with families and lives and homes and friends, right?

Maybe I'm being too touchy. But I think of those guys as friends. I think of them as guys I wanna protect, not fantasize about doing something which will ultimately kill them.
I think you're being too touchy. I don't think us fantasizing about someone taking bare dick will make it any more likely to actually happen, and therefore it doesn't endanger them. Unless, of course, you think the makers of bareback porn are scouring the JUB threads, looking for the names of nice wrapped porn stars to try to seduce into barebacking.

That's possible. It is not likely.

I also think you underestimate the power of early experience. When I came out, and until well after college, condoms were a thing only straight people used, ever. I've accepted the necessity of using them (most of my gay friends from college are dead; I escaped because I was nerdy, not because I was careful), but it's a strong impairment to the erotic. NONE of my fantasies have condoms in them. NONE of my fantasies have HIV/AIDS or any other disease in them either.

I suspect (correct me if I'm wrong) that you came out into a world that already had AIDS in it. You think of condoms as part of the basic routine of sex, like lube, and barebacking as a "why would anyone do that" kind of thing, the way I think of fisting (which is bloody dangerous, choosing words carefully).

OK, I think this thread is on the border. "Who would you like to see take it bareback" is ambiguous. I took it to mean "who do you fantasize about taking it bare" not "who do you think we should engage in a campaign to get him to take it bare." Could be either. The first I think you should let us do without snarking. The second is an outrage and I'd support your objection to it.
 
fisting is gross, but it's not life threatening.

I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. Fisting is, in its way, every bit as life threatening as barebacking. It's not a way to get HIV, that's true.

But every time a guy takes a fist, he's incurring a small but significant risk that his sigmoid colon (which is the consistency of wet paper towels, and not the "rinse-and-reuse" kind either) will be torn. There are no nerve endings there, and so he can't feel that happen, or start to happen. Unless someone is really on the ball and recognizes the symptoms (and fisting is a favorite of the PNP set, who aren't known for their alertness), he could bleed to death internally before he gets to the hospital.

So no, they're not the same. Barebacking puts you at a small but significant risk of dying horribly years from now. Fisting puts you at a small but significant risk of dying horribly tonight.

If you believe in always practicing safer sex, fisting needs to go in the same trash can as barebacking--except that barebacking in a committed monogamous relationship can be safe, and fisting is risky no matter who you do it with.
 
Fisting is, in its way, every bit as life threatening as barebacking. .

I'm well aquainted with both the gross and histological compostion of sigmoid mucosa and muscularis. Fisting carries about the same risk of peritonitis as colonoscopy, and is probably less than severe consitpation/volvulus requiring manual disimpaction (i've done it: my advice is to pull out your hand quickly, stand back, and hold your nose! (sigmoid volvulus = ballistic shit)

Of course while peritonitis secondary to a colon ruputred by fisting (or a colonoscope) is a life-threateining medical emergency, it is, unlike HIV, curable, though will require definitive surgical closure. It is the equivalent of a ruptured appendix or sigmoid diverticuli. However unlike most ruptured diverticuli, which are typically surrounded by a region of frank necrotic tissue, it will not require resection and colostomy -- just a simple repair of the defect, tho' i would send a sample to pathology to see if the rupture at that point was due to a neoplasm. Common things are common, after all. If cold section negative, rinse the gut out with bug juice prior to closure. Parenteral Abx tx (Keflex vs. Zosin) shoud contain the infection and protect against bacteremia/sepsis. keep an eye on the white count. If no rebound tenderness on PE after first post-op flatulance, it's probably okay to switch to PO Augmentin. Get an upright KUB just to make sure there's no air under the diaphragm, PTD. Then get 'em outta the ward and off of my fuckin' service! Discharge note: afeb, VSS, FU appt in a week. Yes, that's how we practice medicine in America.

I love smokers. they always get better faster. funny how that works

but the main question is why the hell would anyone want a fist up their butt in the first place! don't laugh: i actually know some women who like it.
 
I think you're being too touchy. I don't think us fantasizing about someone taking bare dick will make it any more likely to actually happen, and therefore it doesn't endanger them. Unless, of course, you think the makers of bareback porn are scouring the JUB threads, looking for the names of nice wrapped porn stars to try to seduce into barebacking.

That's possible. It is not likely.

What makes me more concerned, actually, is all the bottom-feeding companies coming here to see that 80% of gay men want bareback titles and that they don't care if young men are infected.. in fact.. some of them CRAVE to see the them "breed" their models.

(and you'd be quite surprised how many people in the industry come here to guage what's hot and what's not.)
 
What makes me more concerned, actually, is all the bottom-feeding companies coming here to see that 80% of gay men want bareback titles and that they don't care if young men are infected.. in fact.. some of them CRAVE to see the them "breed" their models.

(and you'd be quite surprised how many people in the industry come here to guage what's hot and what's not.)

Like I said, I think a lot of these companies 'cherry pick' the brent corrigans of the world: the worst kind of sexual preditors.
 
Sheesh. I mean, sheesh.

First off, porn is somewhat out of the mainstream anyway. It's not exactly many folks' first career choice. No one in porn had ever heard of exploitation before bb videos, right? Riiight. I mean, feel skeevy about porn if you must, but feel skeevy about all of it -- not just this one niche.

Second, I find it highly odd that some gay people -- one of the most unfairly judged groups -- are so quick to judge others of their ranks who enjoy a certain kind of porn. You don't see me judging S&M folks and their pictures -- or water sports, or whatever else. Lots of people might find that more disgusting that fucking without a condom.

Finally, I refuse to judge as long as the majority of straight porn is without condoms -- as indeed it is. Why do straight people deserve condom-less porn and not gay people? Why are the women getting fucked in straight porn any less valuable than the men fucked in gay porn? And why aren't you speaking up for them, if this issue is indeed so crucial?

That all being said, I have no desire to get into a pissing match. But I wish we could just let some of this be.
 
SM is about respecting limits and giving away power. It's not about getting infected with a deadly virus.

You're right.. Straight porn doesn't use condoms.

I just wish that the gay community would police itself a bit better.

(And I won't feel "skeevy" about my niche of the industry. I think it's pretty empowering.)
 
Second, I find it highly odd that some gay people -- one of the most unfairly judged groups -- are so quick to judge others of their ranks who enjoy a certain kind of porn. You don't see me judging S&M folks and their pictures -- or water sports, or whatever else. Lots of people might find that more disgusting that fucking without a condom.

Bareback isn't in the same league as watersport, s&m, or even those german 'kaviar' movies in which Cartman's mom supposedly preformed ('essen mein scheize!') It really does put one in harms way, and in the most emergent sense of that term. That's why I consider it little better than snuff porn.

Finally, I refuse to judge as long as the majority of straight porn is without condoms -- as indeed it is. Why do straight people deserve condom-less porn and not gay people? Why are the women getting fucked in straight porn any less valuable than the men fucked in gay porn? And why aren't you speaking up for them, if this issue is indeed so crucial?

Oh, I'm with you there! About a decade ago, Berkeley law professor Catherine McKinnon caught a lot of flack for her ascertation that porn promoted violence against women by constantly depicting them in submissive/degrading situations. I agreed with her then, and I agree with her even more now. I can't think of anything more degrading than having unprotected sex with a stranger who might very well be giving you a lethal disease.

As I said above, I think it is incumbant upon everybody working in the adult industry both to educate on safe sex techniques, and to demonstrate that safe sex is hot sex. We have a far better chance of getting ahead of this virus through enlightened and realistic policy than by pinning our hopes on what promises to be an elusive cure. And as the gay community was the first to be hit, I think it is important for us to take the lead in prevention. Until recently, we were doing a pretty good job of it.

Do you realize that WHO officials reckon that papal interference with distribution of condoms in sub-saharan Africa may be responsible for over a million deaths, and ten million infections? I'd have free condoms in every hamlet in Africa, and I wouldn't think twice about nuking the Vatican if that's what it took to save these lives.

Who the hell do this cadre of professional 'virgins' ;) think they are anyway?

JPII was operating under the delusion that he was a living saint. All I can say is that I hope he dressed for summer for his final journey: I have a feeling that he's in a place that's a tad warmer than he had anticipated:p
 
Alas, and back to topic, Brent has done Barback movies so you'd NEVER see him on Fratmen.

sorry.

Don't worry, Brent would never be interested in working for your silly little carbon copy gay for pay, basically "joke off' oops, I meant "jerk off" website!

Keep Dreaming, Soilwork!

>G
 
A little late to the party, caseycain. Soilwork has left the building.

In fact, his last post was November 25.
 
Back
Top