Funny anti-religious Internet pics

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

And here is our problem. I make a sincere effort to confirm whether atheists could be overlooking something and ask your advice on the subject. You blithely assert that the corresponding situation is impossible.

There is a great deal that you neglect, Kulindahr, and the conversation is poorer for it. Are you that confident? Can you truly pose that bald statement without any fear of hubris?

I've stated what's needed many times: atheists have to get off their faith kick that only science is a means for knowing things. Historians would laugh at that, as would anthropologists. The only way that atheists can claim that there's no evidence for the Bible is to adopt that faith position, because otherwise it becomes necessary to face the reality that the evidence for Christianity is strong.

What is it I neglect? Physics, biology, astronomy -- none of them contradict scripture, and I dodge none of them.

 

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

a bumper sticker I found..

Can't see it ....

http://images0.cpcache.com/product_zoom/590987040_250x250_Front_padToSquare-true.jpg

 

[bort138]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

It should be taxed like alcohol is too.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

in deep jungle borneo
@ wot left it @
yea okay a female was discova fall out sky pair undys
@ Coor not da undys! @
yea ans she go a say aint gonn wash ya shit
@ YEAH! @
ans she go beach ans soak feet wata cause carry ton a stuff feed da males wot busy all day night goin OOH great undys wot is all thang
@ it election year? @
wot dat?
@ it check see population can make X mark then every year da Country wot a most X marks make win da big cheese @
why not icecream?
@ cause gon eat it @
there ya go
@ wot? @
God icecream
@ not anymore @
# licks #

ha

 

[looseliam]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

 

[teadrinker]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Not a pic, but very funny:

-T.

 

[looseliam]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

a bumper sticker I found..

just found this:

 

[star-warrior]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

^ moon motif on a pole over a dome

That looks like a rocket on its way towards a mosque.

 

[looseliam]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

^ moon motif on a pole over a dome

That looks like a rocket on its way towards a mosque.

shhh... it's, erm, Russian. Yeh, Russian.

 

[Anders123]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

"...the chief deficiency I see in the skeptical movement is in its polarization: US vs. Them--the sense that we have a monopoly on the truth; that those other people who believe in all these stupid doctrines are morons; that if you're sensible, you'll listen to us; and if not, you're beyond redemption. This is unconstructive....whereas a compassionate approach that from the beginning acknowledges the human roots of pseudoscience and superstition might be much more widely accepted."

"Have I ever heard a sceptic wax superior and contemptuous? Certainly. I've even sometimes heard, to my retrospective dismay, that unpleasant tone in my own voice. There are human imperfections on both sides of this issue. Even when it's applied sensitively, scientific scepticism may come across as arrogant, dogmatic, heartless and dismissive of the feelings and deeply held beliefs of others.

And, it must be said, some scientists and dedicated sceptics apply this tool as a blunt instrument, with little finesse. Sometimes it looks as if the sceptical conclusion came first, that contentions were dismissed before, not after, the evidence was examined. All of us cherish our beliefs. They are, to a degree, self-defining. When someone comes along who challenges our belief system as insufficiently well based - or who, like Socrates, merely asks embarrassing questions that we haven't thought of, or demonstrates that we've swept key underlying assumptions under the rug - it becomes much more than a search for knowledge. It feels like a personal assault." - Carl Sagan.

I implore you to reflect upon your attitude, StarCrasher. Although you insinuate intellectual superiority by using buzzwords such as 'rationality', 'reason', and 'logic', your consistent religious baiting on JUB is largely driven by emotion. You will never change a religious individual's stance by acting as an aggressive fanatic of logic, particularly if they feel that their faith is an integral part of their identity.

It is one (often necessary) thing to question the beliefs of others, but it is another entirely to attack them.

 

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

^ moon motif on a pole over a dome

That looks like a rocket on its way towards a mosque.

That was my initial impression, too -- it's especially plain when scrolling down from above, before seeing the bottom half. I stopped there in amazement wondering what the point was -- that science attacks religion? or at least Islam?

You neglect much. Just one example of each...

Physics - Jesus walking on water.
Biology - Jesus having no biological father.
Astronomy - The star shining brightly when Jesus was born. (Maybe there was a star shining brightly at the time but it certainly wasn't because of Jesus.)

And once upon a time science was absolutely certain that rocks couldn't possibly fall from the sky, and that the sun went around the earth.

BTW, your third claim's parenthetical remark is a statement of faith.

 

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

I implore you to reflect upon your attitude, StarCrasher. Although you insinuate intellectual superiority by using buzzwords such as 'rationality', 'reason', and 'logic', your consistent religious baiting on JUB is largely driven by emotion. You will never change a religious individual's stance by acting as an aggressive fanatic of logic, particularly if they feel that their faith is an integral part of their identity.

It is one (often necessary) thing to question the beliefs of others, but it is another entirely to attack them.

A couple of the most aggressive fanatics of logic on this board are Christians.

 

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

Since we're doing bombs --

 

[diamondstar]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

This was beautiful. Personally too think Jehovah created an alternate universe so he doesn't have to be bother with our crap 24/7

 

[bort138]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

I feel like if we want to debate religion this is not really the thread for it. This thread is for anti-religious pictures and if you feel the need to defend and incite debate every time someone posts something you disagree with, maybe this isn't the right thread for you. More pics, less talk.

 

[looseliam]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

 

[looseliam]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

He looks awful. I used to have such a crush on him.

me, too

 

[Kulindahr]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

This was beautiful. Personally too think Jehovah created an alternate universe so he doesn't have to be bother with our crap 24/7

LOL

My "heresy of the week" once was that God made all possible universes at once, then threw a dart to pick which one He'd keep.

I feel like if we want to debate religion this is not really the thread for it. This thread is for anti-religious pictures and if you feel the need to defend and incite debate every time someone posts something you disagree with, maybe this isn't the right thread for you. More pics, less talk.

Disagree with? I've disagreed with a lot of pictures, and haven't complained about one. So who are you talking about?


BTW, that's an awesome one. ^

 

[belamyi]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

That was my initial impression, too -- it's especially plain when scrolling down from above, before seeing the bottom half. I stopped there in amazement wondering what the point was -- that science attacks religion? or at least Islam?



And once upon a time science was absolutely certain that rocks couldn't possibly fall from the sky, and that the sun went around the earth.

BTW, your third claim's parenthetical remark is a statement of faith.

Rocks do not fall from the sky, at any rate through the sky. Science also states that the whole universe was created by the god in the Bible: it all depends on that to which you attach the label "science" and, most importantly, whether what you consider "science" is just another way of being as dogmatical as the religious people, just like LDS people call themselves "Christian" while adhering to a book and a prohet that have nothing to do with the Christian tradition.

He looks awful. I used to have such a crush on him.

me, too

When, back in 1987, Growing Pains was announced to start being broadcasted in Spain, I remember seeing a pic of Tracey Gold with sort hair simpering to the camera through thhe rings of big glasses, wondering whether that was a boy and wishing it to be so.

 

[belamyi]

Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics

"Rocks do not fall from the sky, because there are not rocks in the sky": that was what a certain Greek would have been reported to have written. Certainly there have never been rocks in the sky, provided by "sky", as by any other term, you have a very concrete and articulate notion, and not just a vague idea of the sort "whatever is up there". Such notions are too common, and much more in the so-called "soft sciences", but then you can properly call science a discourse which is, not just incomplete as science is by definition, but simply full of loopholes covered by patches held by pins.