Kulindahr, the most revealing thing ever is your responses to this thread. You've never shied away from rebutting or debating pretty much any issue in the most finely-grained detail, with propositions and context and citations. But on this topic we see something different.
Poking fun at the hypocrisy we sometimes note within a religion seems fine to you, as long as you can read the premise of the cartoon as still being amenable to religion. But when the premise of the cartoon is actually on-topic; i.e. that religion represents a complete falsehood, you're falling back on just dismissively countermanding the cartoon with a denial.
It sounds something like this:
…and something like the sort of poster who typically just repeats the infallible slogans of his creed in a kind of catechism on infinite loop.
Humour has a way of getting to the point and laying bare some of the most basic and important ideas. I can't help but see an attempt to evade confronting head-on the insights offered in these cartoons.