- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Posts
- 9,765
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 0
- Location
- City of Angels
- Website
- www.gaydailyhot.com
At least we both agree your argument is ridiculous.
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
If you're gay and need a bra, you're called a "Lesbian."
Or.. really fat. And then you're not welcome in gay bars either.
Wow, even when I'm being respectful and non-confrontational, you insist on being an ass? I never said my argument was ridiculous. I considered your distinction and then countered by going into detail to draw out the relevant parallel. It's not my fault that you can't comprehend that parallel.
.
I simply have no interest in furthering the divide between gays and straights, and fortunately history has proven that time will always close that gap. I can wait.
^^ That's not what I meant.
For those women who make the excuse that there are no strip clubs that cater to women - too fucking bad. That does not give you the right to go into a gay bar to ogle at the men so that you can have what you want for your damn party.
But if I ever have the opportunity I will certainly not be quiet if I see any women acting stupid and making comments. I am just as much of an opinionated bitch off of JUB as I am on it.
.
Or banning gay marriages in churches. I wonder how gays would like it if gay marriage became legal (as it should be) and then churches and banquets were allowed to say, "Sorry. Your celebration is only going to make our straight patrons uncomfortable. You're not allowed. Find your own gay-space to get married in."
I understand that we're not talking about excluding women from gay bars, but rather we're talking about excluding bachelorette parties. And on one hand, that seems reasonable, until you think about the larger moral question. Because straight people can easily use that same language and say, "We're not banning gays from churches and banquets, we're only banning gay marriages from these places."
But on the essential points you raised, we are in agreement.
This has nothing to do with anything we were talking about, but broad strokes seem to be the application of choice here.
Personally I don't think banning something across the board (especially when not all situations would be the same) is a good answer. Why not just allow the parties and if something starts to get rowdy or out of control, and if patrons complain, then the manager can just ask that party to leave?
fuck i think i broke my funnybone on that oneGrandma, get up on the strip pole. It's time we respect drunk party-goers.
if you say these women are making gay guys uncomfortable and appropriating/perverting a safe gay space for their own amusement, can heterosexuals make that same argument about gays in order to justify keeping gays out of spaces such as churches and banquets.
