- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,002
- Reaction score
- 4,586
- Points
- 113
LOL
Neither is getting rid of social security, half of the government agencies, and most of the ideas you propose, but hey... its not like I would accuse you of being arrogant or anything.
There's a big difference: the ideas I propose would actually be beneficial and can be reached. Now, while bombing a country back to the Stone Age could conceivably be reached, it would have the opposite of the desired effect: we'd just be facing more terrorists -- better supplied, better financed.









