The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Has the crime rate risen in your city because of the Pandemic?

@fabulouslyghetto "Police aren't victims of violence." Really?

Police are relatively safe in this country. I invite you to prove me wrong with statistics vs an anecdotal article.
 
^
You need to check the definition of "anecdotal". Fact: The policeman was killed. Fact: He was killed by a black man. Fact: BLM rhetoric is anti-police. Reasonable assumption, but not a fact: The man who killed the policeman was influenced by BLM rhetoric.

Yes, police are relatively safe in this country, just people of all races are generally safe in this country.

By the way, you have previously either refused to respond or dismissed the source when I provided statistics to show that an unarmed white person is more likely to be killed by the police than an unarmed black person.
 
It's election time. Although violent crime is an "issue," there aren't real proposals to stop or lessen it.

Our "good" Senate candidate John Fetterman has proposed releasing many prisoners, especially those in on marijuana charges. Of course Republicans are clutching their pearls.
And they definitely aren't backing any gun control measures, not even raising the purchase age to 21 or background checks.
 
You need to check the definition of "anecdotal". Fact: The policeman was killed. Fact: He was killed by a black man. Fact: BLM rhetoric is anti-police. Reasonable assumption, but not a fact: The man who killed the policeman was influenced by BLM rhetoric.
Fact: Obfuscating black protests is one of the many tactics racists use to disempower black social movements. Fact: They said Martin Luther King hated America and white people too. Different century, same modus operandi. You need to check the definition of racist. Fact: someone who disagrees with every protest, every speech, every activist, every essay, every piece of data, every study that supports civil rights for black people is racist.
By the way, you have previously either refused to respond or dismissed the source when I provided statistics to show that an unarmed white person is more likely to be killed by the police than an unarmed black person.
Because you're lying once again, misrepresenting data. A 5th grade math teacher can explain proportions to you. Here's a study by Yale, you may have heard of them:
Over the past five years there has been no reduction in the racial disparity in fatal police shooting victims despite increased use of body cameras and closer media scrutiny, according to a new report by researchers at Yale and the University of Pennsylvania..... In the case of armed victims, Native Americans were killed by police at a rate three times that of white people (77 total killed). Black people were killed at 2.6 times the rate of white people (1,265 total killed)
Reducing crime isn't even a part of American politics, on either side. Allowing civilians to run wild and free preying on each other is massively profitable for the state. Americans gladly trade safety for the joy of seeing as many black people in jail as possible, regardless of whether or not they pose a legitimate threat to the public. Many of them don't. Cutting the nose off to spite the face, and happy to fund this with your taxes.

Meanwhile, white boys publicly post murder manifestos before executing mass shootings and you weep for the victims but refuse to put yourselves under the same microscope you use to dissect and psychoanalyze blackness. Nobody is safe in this country. Not Muslims, not women, not black people, not Jews, and even white men know they aren't safe hence the gun debate being THE definitive issue for conservative white male politics. MAH GUNZ. A vast majority of serial killers and mass shooters are white men, where's that conversation? Where are the conversations about white collar crime committed by mega corporations? What about sexual violence? We talk about the Middle East like it's so dangerous for women as if 1 in 6 American women aren't victims of sex crimes. And that's not the worst part, many offenders rack up victims, empowered by a system that all but refuses to prosecute sex crimes.

You know what reduces crime? Social programs. Mental healthcare. Nobody is even proposing that we fund these things, Americans actually enjoy talking about crime and have this weird perverse almost sexual gratification from discussing it not to be productive or find solutions but to prove a point about how incapable and dangerous black people are. Well, this new anti-crime spirit is mighty convenient after 400 years of crimes against humanity that were entirely unprosecuted and in fact erased from the history books. As long as we've been having these conversations we aren't even 2 inches closer to finding a solution. We rehash the same themes every time: "Police are the Avengers and black people are dangerous."

The woman behind Emmitt Till's lynching is still alive, why isn't she in jail? Because she's white and he's black. The same people screaming BLUELIVESMATTER have nothing to say about the Jan 6 insurrectionists sending several cops to the ICU, one to the morgue and another to earily retirement from his injuries and emotional trauma. A skeptical person might think it was never about police and was just one of the million ways Americans find to passively give black people the middle finger, eager to use other humans as a prop to do so.
 
Please see the article below by Eugene Volokh, a highly respected professor at the UCLA School of Law in which he discusses both crime statistics and black on black crime. As has often been pointed out in other articles I have posted, but that you either do not respond to or refuse to read because you don't like the source, black people commit crimes out of proportion to their portion of the population in the US, hence their arrest rates, incarceration rates and, sadly, death rates are higher than any other ethnic group. It shouldn't be hard to understand. You are perhaps aware that in survey after survey black respondents say they want more protection by police not less.

 
Please see the article below by Eugene Volokh, a highly respected professor at the UCLA School of Law in which he discusses both crime statistics and black on black crime. As has often been pointed out in other articles I have posted, but that you either do not respond to or refuse to read because you don't like the source, black people commit crimes out of proportion to their portion of the population in the US, hence their arrest rates, incarceration rates and, sadly, death rates are higher than any other ethnic group. It shouldn't be hard to understand. You are perhaps aware that in survey after survey black respondents say they want more protection by police not less.

Who committed the most crime from 1776 to, oh, say, the 1980s? If you've exonerated 400 years of racist crime why can't I do the same for 30 years of inner city crime? Incidents like the Tulsa Massacre highlight how racist mobs and the state destroyed, safe, thriving black communities we built on our own after being run of out white towns. After destroying those towns throughout the 20th century we were coralled into ghettoes that were flooded with narcotics. Why do you hold the street level crack dealer accountable but not the US govt for letting those drugs into the country in the first place? The prevailing theme here is "It's only a crime when black people do it," hence why we commit crimes at about the same rates but are prosecuted much more aggressively.

You're not even discussing these statistics from a place of concern or care, you're trying just repeating 1950s racist propaganda about "those dangerous negroes." Despite repeated attempts to portray white people as our saviors, let's see some stastistics about how many black people want their peers to survive arrest per their constitutional right to due process vs being shot like dogs in the street every time a twitchy officer gets nervous during a routine traffic stop.
 
Someone explain to me, like I'm slow, in an economy where crime is incentivized, what interest does the state have in reducing it? Crime is BIG BUSINESS for the US government.
 
Followup question: Who has committed more crime on US soil since 1776?

Hint: Each individual slave represents a human trafficking charge, that's not including kidnaps, rapes, assaults, harassment, vandalism of black businesses, acts of terrorism, arson, violent mobs, bombings, Are we going to talk about ALL crime or just crimes committed in urban communities in the last 40 years? How do we trust statistics from the same entities that gave themselves a blanket exoneration for MILLIONS of crimes against humanity and nature over the course of several centuries? I don't anticipate a response to this, these are the questions Americans avoid like the plague. So... thanks for listening?
 
Just remembered the original topic, apologies to the author for it devolving into "are black people a bunch of criminals," which I wholly anticipated. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top