Have you ever hated both Presidential Candidates to the point where you just refuse to vote????

[MystikWizard]

The question becomes important in light of the “conversion” concept set forth in the US News article.

No, what it is is an attempt to discredit the content of the article, regardless of the statements contained. That is no different than what Conservatives due to Liberals when they say "Oh, that was from the New York Times" or "MoveOn.org", or where Liberals say to Conservatives "Oh, that was quoted from FOX News" or "Rush".

I find that to be a cop-out frankly simply because it's easier for posters to discredit an entire article by citing a source than it is to go through the content and dispute it.

I am not supporting Donald Trump and am not encouraging anyone to support Donald Trump. That said, feel free to dispute the comments made across all 6 articles about the obsession with Gay Men over Hillary Clinton.

 

[TX-Beau]

No, what it is is an attempt to discredit the content of the article...

You mean the Republican hack trying to get people to vote for Trump?

 

[TX-Beau]

Admit it Cleo, you're a Trumpster aren't you? No, no, don't deny it, I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE THINKING!

- - - Updated - - -

If your logic that "some" gays voting for her because of her vagina means all gays do is valid, then my logic that because I don't, nobody else does, is also valid ^_^

So if there are two of us, does that make us twice as valid?

 

[opinterph]

feel free

Thanks.

No, [the question you posed] is an attempt to discredit the content of the article, regardless of the statements contained.

That is not my intent.

I didn’t find the article particularly skewed. The conclusions are largely based upon anecdotal evidence; however, I also find them interesting. Thanks for sharing.

(I wish you’d add your own summary along with the links.)

 

[frankfrank]

I will concur with him in that Trump is not going to try and touch Gay Rights,

He may not touch gay rights...

But his preliminary list of possible Supreme Court replacements...I believe that somebody said **EVERY ONE OF THEM**...will indeed try to beat us back into our non-legally-married closets if they ever get a chance to hear a case that gets appealed all the way.

 

[Kabluey]

He may not touch gay rights...

'the gays love me' - wait for it...

 

[rareboy]

Hillary is not the lesser of two evils, since ya know, she's not evil. You land yourself charges of misogyny because you repeatedly say the only reason we all will vote for her is her twat, despite months and pages of posts from people telling you that isn't the case.

So one more time for the old college try.

YOU ARE THE ONE OBSESSED WITH TWAT!

WE SUPPORT HER BECAUSE SHE'S THE MOST QUALIFIED PERSON!!

I simply can't be clearer than that.

Can't state it any more clearly than this.

 

[MystikWizard]

Can't state it any more clearly than this.

You can state it until the cows come home, but when Republicans do the same thing and continuously claim they despise Obama "but not because they(we) are racist", I guess this means they are being forthright as well, right?

I am glad there are a lot of other people that see the same things and no, it is not because of qualifications. Any other candidate that would have done the same things Hillary Clinton has done in terms of lies she has been caught in, numerous position changes, aggressive foreign policy closer to George Bush's, friend to Wall Street, would be immediately discounted and not considered for President.

There is something else going on here and I think those articles I quoted sum things up nicely. My mind isn't changing and I don't expect any admission out of anyone because folks know it is wrong. So what's next?

 

[rareboy]

What is next is that until November you will still keep stating and re-stating that all homos only vote for Hillary because of her pussy.

And the homos on this site will just keep telling you how stupid this broad brush claim really is.

 

[MystikWizard]

What is next is that until November you will still keep stating and re-stating that all homos only vote for Hillary because of her pussy.

And the homos on this site will just keep telling you how stupid this broad brush claim really is.

Guess so. Going to drive the point home until the Gay Community realizes how absolutely ridiculous this concept is.

 

[lambdaboy]

Any gay person that would be stupid enough to vote for Trump or write in any candidate would be like Homosexual in Germany in the 30's. Your vote is yours to do with but do not f**k the rest of us up with it!

 

[rareboy]

Guess so. Going to drive the point home until the Gay Community realizes how absolutely ridiculous this concept is.

And we will just keep pointing out why you are wrong.

But knock yourself out.

 

[TX-Beau]

And we will just keep pointing out why you are wrong.

But knock yourself out.

Why is it that these guys always have Republican skeletons in their closet?

 

[eastofeden]

Why is it that these guys always have Republican skeletons in their closet?

Huh? You know Trump isn't that bad!!!!! He won't touch gay rights. Let's just ignore the platform and ignore the Supreme Court and let the orange haired psychopath with thin skin who lies about EVERYTHING have his finger on the nuclear bomb...

...and the ONLY issue with a vagina here is with the one guy who keeps mentioning it. He is obsessed with vaginas. He doesn't even remember that in 2008...people did NOT choose "the vagina"...and reducing a woman to her sexual organ is blatant misogyny....and can you imagine if all he did was talk about gays picking someone because they had a penis?...which would actually make more sense.

I have to admit I have given Gavin Newsom's penis a bit of consideration...but I have never once thought about Barbara Boxer's vagina....

 

[TX-Beau]

Huh? You know Trump isn't that bad!!!!! He won't touch gay rights. Let's just ignore the platform and ignore the Supreme Court and let the orange haired psychopath with thin skin who lies about EVERYTHING have his finger on the nuclear bomb...

...and the ONLY issue with a vagina here is with the one guy who keeps mentioning it. He is obsessed with vaginas. He doesn't even remember that in 2008...people did NOT choose "the vagina"...and reducing a woman to her sexual organ is blatant misogyny....and can you imagine if all he did was talk about gays picking someone because they had a penis?...which would actually make more sense.

I have to admit I have given Gavin Newsom's penis a bit of consideration...but I have never once thought about Barbara Boxer's vagina....

If you are not obsessed with the cooter there is something wrong with you as a gay man!!! One is gay after all because one is obsessed with the Kitty!!

(I too have given significant thought to Gavin's peni.... Ahem, COOTER)

 

[kev]

Nope...I always vote...otherwise, I have no right to spew shit on JUB CE&P.

 

[frankfrank]

^ Exactly. We may tend to disagree, but certainly not on this.

Not voting, I feel, gives me no right to express political opinions...anywhere.

 

[rareboy]

It is an essential obligation to vote...even if you vote for the wrong candidate.

 

[Alnitak]

It is an essential obligation to vote...even if you vote for the wrong candidate.

It's better to not vote than to vote for the "wrong" candidate. In the former, the vote for the "right" one is weakened less than the vote for the "right" one is strengthened.

 

[rareboy]

^ I don't disagree with the sentiment....but at some point in time....a democracy elects the person that it deserves.

If voters stay home in droves, the ones who do go to the polls will decide.

Each side thinks that the other candidate will be a disaster for the country and the world.

Even though I most bitterly oppose the choices that uninformed, racist, knuckle-dragging yobs might make....at some point, if they are the ones voting...they at least have made the effort to exercise their right and duty to vote.

Trump, of course, has now declared that he believes the elections will be rigged....so apparently all our worries about him winning may be merely moot.