Sausy
JUB 10k Club
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2005
- Posts
- 23,727
- Reaction score
- 160
- Points
- 63
Thank you rareboy and Kara Balut for your explanations. I could see certain things like vision and dental could be handled partly(or at least with more range of options) in a private complementary system. And getting the best bang for the buck is not only practical, but wise. My only concern is that as we see in our US system, skimping to keep down costs may be easy but foolish and counterproductive. Encouraging people not to overburden a public system by not offering a wide variety of expensive frills makes sense. But like has been mentioned, there is ongoing pressure from all sides and the best aspects of a more public health delivery system must be what the ultimate goal is. If you don't have to worry about financial burden, you can get the supplemental/expanded coverage available in the private system for easily affordable rates. It's as important to me as ever we need a primarily public health care delivery system with that private extra option. And it is incredibly sad and depressing we in the US are still not with the rest of the developed world on this.
























