Hillary Clinton - stall ball

[springboksfan]

nicely done?

what is this "dancing with the stars"?

sounds like a misdirect to me

as in "yeah maybe hillary never sits in front of a tough interviewer and provides the public with hard answers to tough questions but ............ let me bring up something else"

hardly nicely done

and perhaps off topic

Please, Chance. This whole thread is ridiculous and you know it. "Stall ball"?! At the very least, our friend Lance made a coherent argument--and slammed your boy in the process (sowwy)--and has repeatedly explained why you're not seeing Hillary on the *yawn* Sunday morning programs.

This is not one of your best uses of your wrong-wing misdirection. We weren't even tempted to look for the bird. Try harder next time, eh?

 

[cozmik]

I am increasingly unconvinced about Hilary, which is kind of depressing for me since she's the only fairly strong candidate in the Democratic party right now, from what I've seen.

 

[chance1]

WTF are you trying to say? Could you try to be a bit more precise? Thank you.

Now, back to the topic. . . Chancie, boy. . . let's face it: if she ain't on Fox(RupertMurdoch)News, you ain't gonna see her. Try watching some legitimate news sources, and you can't miss seeing and hearing Ms. Clinton.

[removed inflammatory comment]

could u be further from on point?

me thinks you're projecting ...........

we're talking about

Meet The Press - let Tim Russert ask Hillary about her Iraq vote - about what her vision is - about universal health care - about taxes - etc.

she obviously want NO part of that

Face The Nation - let Schieffer ask her about what role she plans for Bill if she wins - about her immigration thoughts - what to do about Iran's nuclear capabilities

This Week - have George S ask her about who her Cabinet choices might be - how she differentiates herself from the other Dem primary candidates

all three of these hosts are liberal leaning, especially the last 2

and she won't even go there

interesting - how come?

thanks for stopping by Random - but please read the posts before you ASS U ME

 

[chance1]

Please, Chance. This whole thread is ridiculous and you know it. "Stall ball"?! At the very least, our friend Lance made a coherent argument--and slammed your boy in the process (sowwy)--and has repeatedly explained why you're not seeing Hillary on the *yawn* Sunday morning programs.

This is not one of your best uses of your wrong-wing misdirection. We weren't even tempted to look for the bird. Try harder next time, eh?

This thread is ridiculous?

I think you're ridiculous

Hillary will not answer any tough questions - other candidates tell us what they stand for - what they believe in - why they have changed positions - watch and u will see - she is MIA

now why is this ridiculous?

PS - is this u the mod talking?

 

[chance1]

The "topic" that you raised was Hillary's willingness to "face tough questions" and give people answers. Talking to voters face-to-face is a much better way of doing that than sitting in a studio answering questions from a reporter. Answering voters directly is much more effective, especially in the clost-knit politics of Presidential Primaries.

ur kidding right?

Sally Jones from New Hampshire will ask her a tougher question than Tim Russert?

She's campaigning - not facing the fire

Not really good practice for the job IMO

 

[springboksfan]

This thread is ridiculous?

Answered already.

I think you're ridiculous

That borders dangerously close to a personal attack. But I'll let it go--this time.

Hillary will not answer any tough questions - other candidates tell us what they stand for - what they believe in - why they have changed positions - watch and u will see - she is MIA

now why is this ridiculous?

It's ridiculous on many levels:
a. If she were on every talk show/news cast, you would be screaming about how unfair it is that she gets all the attention and those poor (pathetic) republican candidates get none.

b. Your assertion that she is "will not answer any tough questions" has no basis in reality. She is continually asked tough (and softball, granted) questions. Just because you don't like her answers does not make it less true.

c. You attack her because she is spending time with the people (you know, the ones whose votes are supposed to count), not with the talking heads who are advancing the agenda of whatever network they're working for.

d. You are so consumed with anti-Democratic, anti-Hillary hatred that your perspective is not only skewed, it is bordering on the inane.

Some advice: Make a point, then support your arguments in complete sentences (preferably in paragraph form) and perhaps someone in JUBland will begin to take you seriously.

PS - is this u the mod talking?

If it weren't, we wouldn't be having this conversation. I could be any number of incarnations in a non-mod persona, couldn't I?

 

[chance1]

Answered already.


That borders dangerously close to a personal attack. But I'll let it go--this time.


It's ridiculous on many levels:
a. If she were on every talk show/news cast, you would be screaming about how unfair it is that she gets all the attention and those poor (pathetic) republican candidates get none.

b. Your assertion that she is "will not answer any tough questions" has no basis in reality. She is continually asked tough (and softball, granted) questions. Just because you don't like her answers does not make it less true.

c. You attack her because she is spending time with the people (you know, the ones whose votes are supposed to count), not with the talking heads who are advancing the agenda of whatever network they're working for.

d. You are so consumed with anti-Democratic, anti-Hillary hatred that your perspective is not only skewed, it is bordering on the inane.

Some advice: Make a point, then support your arguments in complete sentences (preferably in paragraph form) and perhaps someone in JUBland will begin to take you seriously.


If it weren't, we wouldn't be having this conversation. I could be any number of incarnations in a non-mod persona, couldn't I?

would love a JUB debate on the definition of "personal attack"

If "you're ridiculous" constitutes as a response to "your thread is ridiculous" well

a) as for my reaction to her appearing on TV, you're off the mark - nice try - ie "she can't win"

FOR THE RECORD, WOULD LOVE TO SEE WHAT SHE BELIEVES IN - IS THERE ANYTHING?

b) she's not answering tough questions - cause she does NOT appear in those forums

c) This is not an attack - that's what you and the 80 do - this is "what's up Hillary" - sorry u don't see the diff

d) are you calling me inane? attack !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks for advice - but I'll pass

crazy to me that u are a mod

your posts suggest you are not the stuff of a mod


see ya

 

[Centexfarmer]

would love a JUB debate on the definition of "personal attack"

We had that discussion / debate / dialogue back in March. Remember?

Oh wait, you and another member got off-topic attacking each other, and we had to delete some of your posts.

http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=148642

If "you're ridiculous" constitutes as a response to "your thread is ridiculous" well

a) as for my reaction to her appearing on TV, you're off the mark - nice try - ie "she can't win"

FOR THE RECORD, WOULD LOVE TO SEE WHAT SHE BELIEVES IN - IS THERE ANYTHING?

b) she's not answering tough questions - cause she does NOT appear in those forums

c) This is not an attack - that's what you and the 80 do - this is "what's up Hillary" - sorry u don't see the diff

Can't think of anything more divisive than a 20 / 80% split.

d) are you calling me inane? attack !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Inane, obtuse, verbose, turse, these are descriptive terms, and I don't see the correllation to cunt, fucktard, idiot, and some of the other words bantered around this forum.

thanks for advice - but I'll pass

crazy to me that u are a mod

your posts suggest you are not the stuff of a mod


see ya

Even Mods are human beings, they have opinions too.

 

[springboksfan]

Chance, you need to realize I've been a moderator here longer than you've been a member. Obviously your opinion of my abilities is not shared by the site owners.

That said, you have been the subject of a forum ban how many times? None of which were doled out by me, I might add. Perhaps you should take better care of the hand that feeds you or he might stop.

 

[chance1]

Chance, you need to realize I've been a moderator here longer than you've been a member. Obviously your opinion of my abilities is not shared by the site owners.

That said, you have been the subject of a forum ban how many times? None of which were doled out by me, I might add. Perhaps you should take better care of the hand that feeds you or he might stop.

my opinion of your abilities as a moderator is based on your obnoxious comments to me - see previous posts - if that's the "stuff" of a mod ................ whatever

and if the owners love that kinds of moderating, to each his own

I think it's pretty weak

I think your personal attacks are pretty weak

as for u being here longer, not sure that means anything except you've been here longer

and feel free to to tell the class teacher how many times I have been banned - if a rehash is what u want, let's go

i'm sure we'd all like to know

according to this "moderator"

I'm a gnat
I should use complete sentences
I'm not taken seriously

nice moderating

not sure if you look in the dictionary under moderating, you'll find any of your comments

u throw ur weight around like ......................... those you suggest u detest

how ironic and eye opening

 

[chance1]

We had that discussion / debate / dialogue back in March. Remember?

Oh wait, you and another member got off-topic attacking each other, and we had to delete some of your posts.

http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=148642



Can't think of anything more divisive than a 20 / 80% split.



Inane, obtuse, verbose, turse, these are descriptive terms, and I don't see the correllation to cunt, fucktard, idiot, and some of the other words bantered around this forum.



Even Mods are human beings, they have opinions too.

I know we did
"ridiculous" does not apply
I think we can all agree on that except one
feel free to publish the deleted posts - and let the viewers decide

the 20/80 is what it is my friend - an accurate representation of the "divide"
sorry if the truth hurts

as for the banter u refer to, not my style - that's for the elite members of the 80

I think it sucks when mods throw their weight around as if .........
and write bannable things and get away with it cause they're mods
it flat out sucks

 

[springboksfan]

Chance, my buddy, my friend, my love... Yeah, I don't feel any desire to allow this to continue. You just have yourself a fantastic weekend, eh? And don't forget--vote early and often!

 

[smelter]

Finally! Something we agree on thanks

And, I just realized that I have 1,000 posts. Hard to believe that I made it this far without being banned, even for a short time. I'm going to prepare for the deluge of well wishes for my posting accomplishment and the many, many thousands of posts you all will wish from me in the future. (tongue planted firmly in..uh...cheek, yeah, that's it

Congratulations, 1,000 posts is indeed a notable event. I haven't agreed with the content of them very often but presume you feel the same about mine. The fact that mine happen to be correct and yours are not, should not dissuade you from continuing. This would be a boring place if there were no differences in philosophies.

 

[chance1]

Chance, my buddy, my friend, my love... Yeah, I don't feel any desire to allow this to continue. You just have yourself a fantastic weekend, eh? And don't forget--vote early and often!

u too

I find it unusual that u have deleted your attacks on me - but my response to you remains as is

so you start the name calling - I call u on it - and my calling u on it remains - but your bile is removed - poof

instead you should apologize for what you wrote - not delete it as if it never happened

that would be the right thing to do

 

[White Eagle]

^^She's got em ain't she.
Congrats on your 1m fuckbait

 

[chance1]

Another Sunday - NO HILLARY

Face the Nation - Diane Feinstein and Arlen Specter
Meet The Press - Chris Dodd and Newt Gingrich
This Week - Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell

what was Hillary doing?

not facing the fire

not talking about her vision

not answering tough questions

makes sense I guess to stay out of harm's way

but I'd like to see more from someone who we might elect as President

I think she's being managed too much

 

[springboksfan]

Hmm. Perhaps it's a conspiracy to keep Hillary off the Sunday programs. Ya think? You know, give her any exposure and she risks being elected. Can't have a woman in the WH. We'd have to amend the Constitution first. Just thinking aloud.

 

[springboksfan]

Well, mo, you could always check out her website. i believe it's hillaryclinton.com

 

[smelter]

Well, mo, you could always check out her website. i believe it's hillaryclinton.com

He has her website on his ignore list.

 

[smelter]

No, just one insane poster on here

Chance isn't insane .... but then again, on second thought ......