So, that article is saying that the NUS has dropped their rep role for gay men, because gay men are no longer oppressed, and instead, the representive groups are there for the more marginalized.
This suggests that gay rights have done well here in the UK. This is great.
It is pretty damn annoying that there are gay men out there who seem to think that gay rights is more about eliminating the prejudice than achieving the equality.
Gay rights have only achieved the level they have through the support of those who are not prejudiced to begin with. And the equality helps to deter prejudice from setting root in others.
The prejudice itself is hardly a great issue as long as rights are protected. To be a gay student told by the NUS that being gay is no longer oppressive, that IS in sync with British social norms. It doesn't mean that prejudice no longer exists towards those who are not cisgendered, and i see the article reporting a motion blaming cis gay men for homophobia within the gay community, but, a) gay rights as a whole have been served, b) cis gay men are subject to prejudice within the gay community too, and c) rights for marginalized groups are still represented. There is no need to conflate different social issues.
To refujiunderground:- as a white male, i can't empathise with your own struggles, but beating up on the white gay guy is not only racist, but its completely pointless. Gay rights and racism are two different things, and its quite an hypocrisy to attack the white gay guy over your personal struggles being a guy who has to deal with dual prejudice. Like i said, i can't empathise with that, but i do sypathise. You lose that sympathy by devaluing the equality achieved within gay rights. Its like you are transferring hate.