The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

"Hope and Change" are just words

Kulindahr said:
When the opposition controls one house of Congress and decides to be totally obstructive, the executive is powerless.
Click to expand...

Most likely but I suspect the truly great leaders can overcome even that but we haven't had one of those in a while. But the statement I was responding to was the President cannot be effective unless his party has a filibuster proof control of the congress. Hey if we have all the cheat codes we can all win the game but a good leader doesn't NEED complete control of congress. I think a healthy minority (and that means one willing to compromise) is a good thing in politics. I think one party have complete control of Washington would be just as bad if not worse than the current situation. It is hard to pass bad legislation when you aren't passing any legislation at all.
 
"Southern Strategy" (Nixon) just words.
"A Thousand Points of Light" (Bush 41) just words.
"Mission Accomplished" (Bush 43) just words.

"Obama a one-term president" (Mitch McConnell) more than words.

Mitchcrop.jpg


Read the book: Don't Ask What Good We Do by Robert Draper. It's all in there.

51XsTH6tvML__BO2204203200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-clickTopRight35-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
 
Benvolio said:
Yes and Presidents do act outside the law, as BO granting amnesty to illegals.
Click to expand...
Not true. Funds to help the children of illegals was already allocated. No need for obstructionist Congress.
 
Kulindahr said:
So you're just one more who thinks that government exists to give you freebies?

What happened to "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"?
Click to expand...

I don't expect entitlements, but what i look is who is looking out for me and my situation and which candidate will most have a positive effect on my life, i do not look for "free money" nor anything like that. What is important for me may not be important for an older person and vice versa.
 
stevexxx said:
I don't expect entitlements, but what i look is who is looking out for me and my situation and which candidate will most have a positive effect on my life, i do not look for "free money" nor anything like that. What is important for me may not be important for an older person and vice versa.
Click to expand...

What happened to "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"?

I vote for what's right. I've voted against my own "interests" more than once. What's in everyone's interest is far more important than what's in mine.
 
Kulindahr said:
What happened to "ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"?

I vote for what's right. I've voted against my own "interests" more than once. What's in everyone's interest is far more important than what's in mine.
Click to expand...

I doubt that. Capitalism and free enterprise are demonstrably in everyone's interests (except politicians pandering to buy votes), but your bizarre hatred of corporations is a denial of economic freedom.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top