The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

How do you rate Congress?

Do you approve of the job Congress is doing?


  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .

CO Bob

Sex God
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Posts
617
Reaction score
20
Points
18
Location
Broomfield
The current approval ratings are out. Congress now polling at only 18% approval of the American's polled.

Makes me wonder about those on this forum.

Do you approve, or disapprove of the job Congress has done since they began in January?
 
The current approval ratings are out. Congress now polling at only 18% approval of the American's polled.

Makes me wonder about those on this forum.

Do you approve, or disapprove of the job Congress has done since they began in January?

My answer isn't available on the poll. I approve of the job the Democrats are TRYING to do. I disapprove of the obstructionist tactics of the Republicans.
 
However, it is in the area of strategy political gamesmanship that the Dems have fallen on their asses (and can't seem to get up). They got rolled over the domestic spying bill, a dark moment and one that will not be easy to correct. They need to do more to expose the cowardice of the Republicans for perpetuating the perpetual quagmire in Iraq.

I can understand why you say that. However, the best political strategy on earth doesn't do you any good when you simply don't have the votes to get things done.
 
Why did I know every post here would be to blame the GOP.

How ever umm somebody,cant speak his name did make a good point
However, it is in the area of strategy political gamesmanship that the Dems have fallen on their asses (and can't seem to get up). They got rolled over the domestic spying bill, a dark moment and one that will not be easy to correct.
 
My answer isn't available on the poll. I approve of the job the Democrats are TRYING to do. I disapprove of the obstructionist tactics of the Republicans.
So, you're happy that the Democratic leadership cannot govern?

A simple poll question, which hardly needs to be divided into sub-catagories to make your favorite politician seem able to do the job elected to do. Yet it boggles the minds of you partisans? All I am asking is, do you approve of Congress's accomplishments or not?

I was just curious, was not looking for alot of debate on the subject.
 
Not surprising - completely ineffective

Nancy Pelosi who came out like a whirlwind with gums flapping - has retreated - probably asked/told to do so

She takes unspectacular to a new level

Murtha is another hack who for some reason has some pull

Congress's performance is neck and neck with GWB - not a good thing - for them - or the country

I vote NOOOOOOO

yeah yeah - the Repubs are blocking them ............... zzzzzzzzzzzzz
 
Why did I know every post here would be to blame the GOP.

because they are, in fact, still a large part of the congress and they have been engaging in obstructionist actions since they lost power.

they will lose even more of their seats in the coming elections and this mess will end as the rethuglicans are tossed to the curb for a few decades

are you excited, letme?

you guys are gonna get a new seat with a birds eye view of your presidents morals

eye level to a worms bellybutton

its called irrelevance
 
So, you're happy that the Democratic leadership cannot govern?

A simple poll question, which hardly needs to be divided into sub-catagories to make your favorite politician seem able to do the job elected to do. Yet it boggles the minds of you partisans? All I am asking is, do you approve of Congress's accomplishments or not?

I was just curious, was not looking for alot of debate on the subject.

And you had the audacity to call me an "asshole."

I wrote this:
I approve of the job the Democrats are TRYING to do.
To which you replied:
So, you're happy that the Democratic leadership cannot govern?
Trouble with reading comprehension, dear?

Oh, and:
I was just curious, was not looking for alot of debate on the subject.
Were that true, you wouldn't have asked a loaded question in the poll. It's called "baiting," sweetheart.
 
And you had the audacity to call me an "asshole."

Were that true, you wouldn't have asked a loaded question in the poll. It's called "baiting," sweetheart.
A poll with an easy, open ended, totally neutral, two-choice answer is baiting?

My original thoughts about you were correct!..|

</IMG>
 
Look out-side of New England,Drew. You live in a world of full of Libs. Other parts of the country are very displeased by by this currant house. Feel the beat of the whole USA. This is not a cake walk you's are on.

The WH is the GOP's to loose. As a course of history,and the down falls of GWB.(btw I am not very pleased with him,also).

The Hill is even now,,,It just may swing back to the right,And I will stste now,it will if HRC gets the DNC Nomination.
 
purse fight in aisle six.... walmart security to ladies undergarminks...lol

come on Co Bob....

we are not kiddies

you are starting a partisan discussion

dont get uppity when you are called on it

just own it and go on with the discussion we are going to have as partisans
 
A poll with an easy, open ended, totally neutral, two-choice answer is baiting?

My original thoughts about you were correct!..|

First, "open ended" is not the same as "yes or no." And, right, "totally neutral" in that if we liberals voted "yes" you smash us with "you guys just blindly follow the party line, don't you!" If we vote "no" you come back with "See, I was right about the Democrats in the first place!" Either way we vote, you place yourself superior to us. It's baiting, sweetie. You know it. I know it. And everybody else around here knows it. And, because I call you on your BS, I'm an asshole.[-X

"Hello, Kettle? This is Pot!"
 
you are starting a partisan discussion

No, I simply wanted to see how the results of the people that frequent this forum compare to the results of the poll recently done. Just curious, nothing beyond that.

Say what you want, look for meanings that are not there. I will check back on this after it has had some time with people able to vote without trying to savage the poster.
 
No, I simply wanted to see how the results of the people that frequent this forum compare to the results of the poll recently done. Just curious, nothing beyond that.

Say what you want, look for meanings that are not there. I will check back on this after it has had some time with people able to vote without trying to savage the poster.

sweety

really

dont kid yourself

not even your republican buddies will try to say that this isnt a partisan baiting thread with a straight face

you DO realize how silly it is to say that it isnt.... right?

lets just all act out our parts and let it die by tomorrow morning

ok here goes....

Bush sucks

ok

your turn ;)
 
I can understand why you say that. However, the best political strategy on earth doesn't do you any good when you simply don't have the votes to get things done.

You have a simple majority in the house. That's all you need there. The republicans never had 60 votes in the Senate and they managed to get their agenda enacted, like it or not. The people were looking for results, not excuses. You might try admitting that you offered no real agenda in 2006, and that's what you've provided. At least that would be honest.
 
You have a simple majority in the house. That's all you need there. The republicans never had 60 votes in the Senate and they managed to get their agenda enacted, like it or not.

Republicans had an absolute majority, not a simple majority. And the Republican legislative record in the 105th, 106th and 107th Congress was not nearly as impressive as it should have been, considering the margin of their majority and how the Lewinsky scandal weakened Democratic power.

You say they got their agenda enacted. What agenda was that? They fell short in a number of ways, including failing to roll back the "welfare state." But their PR was effective.

You might try admitting that you offered no real agenda in 2006, and that's what you've provided. At least that would be honest.

That wouldn't be honest; it'd be a lie.

The Democratic agenda in 2006 that put them in control of Congress included pushing Bush to pull out of Iraq and re-instituting the role of oversight -- both of which Democrats have done. Bush refusing to draw troops out of Iraq is something the Democratic simple majority in Congress does not have the power to override.
 
And lets not forge tthat all of pelosis promises for the first one hundred hours were acomplished

the republicans have been holding up the senate with filibusters ever since... and even if they could override them, the president would veto out of spite.

one acheivement that oversight has accomplished.....bubye rove and gonzo baby

and those two things are worth it ALL
 
Republicans had an absolute majority, not a simple majority. And the Republican legislative record in the 105th, 106th and 107th Congress was not nearly as impressive as it should have been, considering the margin of their majority and how the Lewinsky scandal weakened Democratic power.

You say they got their agenda enacted. What agenda was that? They fell short in a number of ways, including failing to roll back the "welfare state." But their PR was effective.



That wouldn't be honest; it'd be a lie.

The Democratic agenda in 2006 that put them in control of Congress included pushing Bush to pull out of Iraq and re-instituting the role of oversight -- both of which Democrats have done. Bush refusing to draw troops out of Iraq is something the Democratic simple majority in Congress does not have the power to override.


An absolute majority would be 50%plus one of the total number of members of a given unit. That number is 218 in the House of Representatives and 51 in the Senate. The dims have an absolute majority in the House and there is some dispute about the Senate being as there are two independants who happen to caucus with the dims.

As to the pug agenda. They promulgated and voted on the Contract With America as they promised to do. Politicians keeping their word was quite the concept at the time. Welfare reform went well enough. I'm pleased that fewer Americans depend on the government for their daily bread. Fact is,we should all be proud of that accomplishment.

The dims on the other hand had a promise to end the war, which they failed to do and raising the minimum wage, which they did. Not a great record of accomplishment. As to oversight, I like it. Not much has come of it, but I support it as a concept.
 
At least they have done more now than the Republicans in 1995.

Op-Chart: A New, Improved Congress?

JUST before Congress adjourned for its August recess, Democrats engaged in a flurry of legislative activity, while Republicans complained about a “do-nothing” Congress’s meager policy accomplishments. Deep partisan differences, narrow majorities and a Republican in the White House have frustrated Democratic ambitions and fueled a toxic atmosphere in both chambers of Congress. The public’s low approval ratings reflect broad discontent with the direction of the country but also displeasure with Congress for failing to reverse course on Iraq and for continuing the bitter partisan warfare.

But has this really been a do-nothing Congress? The circumstances are similar to those in 1995, when a new Republican majority in both houses took office under a Democratic president. So perhaps the best question to ask is, how is this 110th Congress doing compared with the 104th Congress, in 1995?

Both new majorities began by spending more time in session, holding more committee meetings and roll call votes, and passing more substantive measures than the Congress before them had. At the same time, in both cases, the number of bills signed into law by the president from January to August dropped.

Still, the Democratic Congress’s legislative harvest this year has been bountiful compared with that of its Republican counterpart in 1995. Back then, the Republicans’ Contract With America was stymied by opposition from the Senate and the president. The new Congress has enacted a far-reaching lobbying and ethics reform bill, an increase in the minimum wage, recommendations of the 9/11 Commission, foreign investment rules and a competitiveness package, and has embedded a number of major initiatives and new priorities in continuing and supplemental spending bills. Democrats also made headway on energy, children’s health insurance, college student loans, Head Start, drug safety and a farm bill — though much of this awaits action in the Senate or in conference and faces a possible veto.

During the first seven months of 1995, Congressional oversight of the executive branch increased modestly in the Senate but not at all in the House. But this year Congress, especially the House, has intensified its oversight, following years of inattention and deference by its Republican predecessor.

Democratic promises to restore civility and regular parliamentary procedure by allowing the minority party a larger role in deliberations have foundered. The number of restrictive rules for debate has increased, and the conference process has been short-circuited on various occasions.

In the Senate, Republicans have made the filibuster, or the threat of filibuster, routine, setting a 60-vote hurdle for all contested legislative matters. This has led Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, to file many more petitions for cloture than Bob Dole, his counterpart in 1995, did.

The chart below shows what the 110th Congress accomplished before it closed for its August recess, compared with its immediate predecessor and with the Republican Congress that took office in 1995.

26opchart.large.jpg
 
Back
Top