Willie Boy
BOO!!! Mwahahahaha!!!!!
In your initial response to my post you said I have no understanding of sarcasm. I fail to see how that's not equivalent to not understanding sarcasm.
When I read your initial post, I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic or not. If you were being serious, which is how I took your initial Beiber post, I think my point was correct.
Again, you are still missing the point.

 ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)
As stated before and dealt with, it was sarcasm. Moving on...When I read your initial post, I wasn't sure if you were being sarcastic or not. If you were being serious, which is how I took your initial Beiber post
As has been stated and restated, it was sarcasm. Your point is moot.If you were being serious, which is how I took your initial Beiber post, I think my point was correct.
Moving on...
We went on to have more dialogue in which I stated that if someone were to break up with another over the triviality of not liking the same music, there would actually be deeper issues that were the true reason.
You disagreed and gave the example that you would break up with a boyfriend that didn't like your music, with the stipulation that he was NOT allowing you to listen to your music. This is called being controlling. The point is, in your own example, that it would be because he was controlling (not merely that he didn't like your music) that you were breaking up with him. So, while you claimed to disagree with what I said, your own example proved me correct.
Moving on...
There is no difference. I originally pointed out that you do not understand sarcasm (you thought my sarcasm wasn't, and after having it explained you still don't get it). Then after explaining the sarcasm I pointed out that you didn't get the point that my sarcasm was pointing at. Those are two different issues. One is the destination, the other is the means of travel. LAX (Los Angeles International Airport) is not the same thing as the 747(or even a DC-10) used to get there.you said I have no understanding of sarcasm. I fail to see how that's not equivalent to not understanding sarcasm
I'm seriously losing faith in your ability to comprehend beyond the 3rd grade level here.



Who knew there would be so much popcorn in this thread?!