Gaydar is a joke.It cant be taken seriously.Most of the time,when somebody GUEST which men are gay,its out of luck or people rely on stereotypes.
For example,Zachary Quinto came out.Lots of people were saying,my gaydar tells me that Zachary Quinto is gay.In other words.They were basically saying.Zachary Quinto is kind of feminine,so he must be gay.
I always knew that Ricky Martin was gay. But it as nothing to do with gaydar.It just something you know.Not everytime,but sometimes.
A radar (gaydar) should be totally accurate. Its obviously not the case.Since so much people are wrong with the men they thinks are gay,but they are straight.When they show that their gaydar is off,they show that gaydar is not reliable. There you have it. Gaydar is fake.
There is no such thing as gaydar. Gaydar is only a stupid trend who supposedly says which men are gay.Yeah right! Gaydar is only 1 thing.Its bullsh?t.
Hi Marco Sensual,
I disagree with you on the point that gaydar should be totally accurate. Who has told you that the gay radar (=gaydar) should be accurate for 100%?
Towards my opinion, gaydar does not need to work for 100% accurate. Towards my opinion, people (guys and girls) are different in any aspect, so also in their ability to identify 'likely gay guys'. Besides that, gays are in no way similar to each other, so also in the way how they 'show' to people around them that they are gay. Behaviour of Humans is very, very flexible, and people can develop a huge array of behaviour characteristics as well. So closeted gays have a huge array of ways to stay 'under the radar', where other people (be aware of women!) can develop alot of ways to detect gays who try to 'stay under the radar'.
I cannot tell you anything about Zachary Quinto and about Ricky Martin, as I have never met them in real life. So I have no idea how they behave in real life, eg when I would meet them in the local grocery without knowing who they are. Besides that, both of them are professional performers.
I agree with you that my gaydar (and likely the gaydar of alot of other gays as well) cannot identify any gay. On the other hand, one can definately learn (people are very, very adaptive in many behavioural characteristics) to improve the gaydar.
Indeed, gaydar might often looks like some sort of 'intuition'. But all goes down to tiny bits of information from a guy processed very, very quickly in your brain.
Straight guys who are 'checking girls' will also be able to tell you very quickly which girl is 'interested'. It is some sort of 2-way process. The straight guy is 'looking around', but the girl as well.
So there will also be a difference in behaviour between open gays, and very closeted gays.
So alot of 'interested' males will be able to idetify Molten Rock 111 as gay, because MR111 is very open (am I right?), especially in the named situations?
Others are right that gaydar has a very strong cultural aspect. The behaviour of guys in eg several African countries, in the ME and also in several Asian countries more to the east is totally different from the way how straight white guys in Western Europe are behaving.
So some clues. And these clues can lead to a more close look to a guy. How is he behaving (or is he together with his BF).
So gaydar is not accurate, and does not need to be accurate.
Best wishes