- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,821
- Reaction score
- 4,062
- Points
- 113
I think so. A few hours ago in Ashland, Oregon I met a woman [half of a hetero married couple] who had hips replaced in 1999 and 2003. Neither hip has EVER been very good since replacement, she's always(?) been on crutches since.
Actually, her second hip went because they made the first replacement and her leg was an inch longer than before. (REALLY...that definitely sounds "primitive." In medicine, a one-inch mistake might be as significant as a trip to the Moon. I certainly assume that stuff has been solved.)
In contrast, you have had both hips replaced in recent months, and you did our five mile hike (complete with significant rises and drops) like a champ, and your hip (or both?) only started complaining near the end of the hike. You were "paying for it" before I left...but, still. I don't think such results existed 10 years ago.
Over the last two days I did another five-mile hike: two and a quarter down the south side of that same cape, and a quarter mile down the beach; played on the beach for a day, and today hiked back up.
Descent time: 50 minutes. Ascent time: 1 hour forty minutes.
The hips actually felt better this morning after sleep on dry sand I got contoured to my body than most mornings. And there were no complaints from the hiking till the last quarter mile.
Oh -- it's an eight hundred foot change in elevation, from beach to trailhead.

