The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

I like to hit that priest in the face.

Just saw the clip for the first time. I'm surprised no one has commented that the priest (whatever he calls himself) is gay.
 
bendted said:
Just saw the clip for the first time. I'm surprised no one has commented that the priest (whatever he calls himself) is gay.
Click to expand...

Would you mind explaining how you came to that assumption? I don't remember seeing or hearing anything that would imply that.
 
Willie Boy said:
Would you mind explaining how you came to that assumption? I don't remember seeing or hearing anything that would imply that.
Click to expand...

It takes one to know one. There are a lot of gay hints in his demeanor, mannerism and speech.
 
For a second I thought you were serious, but you only have the "He's gay because I say so" stereotyping going.
 
sorry i have to post this.
I can interpret that priest's words for you now, quote:

" ... and in accordance to my will you now confess it. Please sirs leave. Leave anywhere other than here. This is a so-lam assemble not a photography session. Please move or i will stop. I will stop the ceremony if you not get out of the way. This is not about the photography, this is about me. "
 
^^

You evidently don't understand anything about a marriage ceremony. It's not about the photographer. It's about the couple being married and the officiant.

People get married without photographers -- but never without the officiant and the two getting married.
 
Jack Springer said:
^^

You evidently don't understand anything about a marriage ceremony. It's not about the photographer. It's about the couple being married and the officiant.

People get married without photographers -- but never without the officiant and the two getting married.
Click to expand...

It's actually about the couple making a publicly recognised and publicly recorded declaration of their intentions toward each other. The record is the key part here. In that regard, a photographer and his work really are closer to the essential purpose of a wedding than you let on.
 
Jack Springer said:
^^

You evidently don't understand anything about a marriage ceremony. It's not about the photographer. It's about the couple being married and the officiant.

People get married without photographers -- but never without the officiant and the two getting married.
Click to expand...

You clearly didn't read this thread.
It is clearly about the couple having a party to celebrate their friendship, sex and happily together. That priest was in their way and in their face.
 
bankside said:
It's actually about the couple making a publicly recognised and publicly recorded declaration of their intentions toward each other. The record is the key part here. In that regard, a photographer and his work really are closer to the essential purpose of a wedding than you let on.
Click to expand...

Photos aren't essential to the record -- they're a totally elective accessory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top