The urologist examined me, regarding my foreskin
The long-standing appointment finally arrived at the hospital today.
So, he had a good, thorough look (I wish he was a little gentler when he pushed my foreskin back

). The foramen (hope that's the correct term) extends some 1 or 1-and-a-half cm at the tip of my penis - no more.
He commented on some slight inflammation. Then he described the procedure of circumcision. Really, he was quite relaxed about the whole issue of whether or not I should get it done, and said that the option was up to me. He didn't appear, from his manner, to make it out as an extremely serious or urgent issue (thank goodness).
I asked him if there was any health concern with leaving things the way they are. He said that there is a very rare, or slightly increased, risk of cancer (due to secretions or something).
He asked about pain, bleeding, sexual partners, intercourse, etc. I told him about never having any trouble at all, and told him that I wouldn't have gone 15 years of my adult life without even realising I had a problem, if I did. I told him about never having a sexual partner. He commented about risks of infection, particularly with regard to having sexual partners.
Anyways, to sum up, at the end, I just said to him that, since I'm not sexually active, and since I've never had any trouble, of any kind, that I'll just leave things the way they are.
I suppose there'll always be a slight worry at the back of mind about cancer risks.
I mean, I'm not really sure how serious a risk it is - but it has to be counterbalanced with the physical pain and emotional distress I would have if a circumcision went ahead.
If anyone has opinions, please share.