Is Obama the anti-openness president?

[cm98059]

We don't know what Obama did in regards to issues after he was in office. He could very well have had his attorney general look at all of Bush's executive orders. It appears that most of Bush's executive orders were regarding chain of succession in DOT and other federal administrations. Several of Bush's executive orders were less than one page long. It probably did not take long to go through all 291 of them. Very few seem to be geared towards National Security, or Terrorism. So there probably wasn't too much to find that could infringe on constitutional freedoms, real or imagined.

 

[Jack Springer]

And if you asked someone who doesn't care, but is just looking at the record?

If you asked that person ... they would be aghast at how the Administration does not provide information, fails to respond to subpoenas, and cracks down on anyone speaking out in the Administration.

 

[Rolyo85]

If you asked that person ... they would be aghast at how the Administration does not provide information, fails to respond to subpoenas, and cracks down on anyone speaking out in the Administration.

Must be fun living in a fact-free environment.

 

[CowboyBob]

^^

The question of the thread 'is he the anti-openness President'. The simple and correct answer is yes.

The question isn't .. .do you love the President.

And what exactly isn't the President telling you that you want to know?

 

[Jack Springer]

He won't answer questions or provide information on the following.


- Fast and Furious
- Benghazi
- IRS targeting Obama enemies
- ObamaCare -- how can the President change the law when it was passed by Congress.
- Justice Department targeting the AP
- Justice Department targeting James Rosen, wiretapping his parents
- Holder committing perjury in testimony before Congress regarding Rosen
- Sebelius violating the Hatch Act
- The use of private emails and fake names to conduct official government business, therefore making it difficult if not impossible for Congress to perform their duties in checks and balances of the executive branch
- New Black Panthers -- the federal government now officially looks the other way when disruptive blacks cause voters uneasiness at the polls
- I want to know who hacked into Sharyl Attkisson's computer. Did the Justice Department do it?
- Instead of capturing and getting information from terrorists -- why does Obama just kill them and anyone else that is around them?
- Why does the Obama Administration crack down on whistleblowers so much ... more than any other US President?

 

[Rolyo85]

Benghazi!!!


Hey Jack, this just in - Obama already won reelection. Nobody cares about BENGHAZI anymore!

 

[CowboyBob]

Benghazi!!!


Hey Jack, this just in - Obama already won reelection. Nobody cares about BENGHAZI anymore!

Looks like someone is listening to right wing radio ands watching a little too much Fox. Conspiracy theories and scandals are bouncing off the walls. And after President Obama completes his successful second term the right wingers will forget about everything and attack President Hillary Clinton.

Will we hear about Whitewater again? Maybe they'll start peddling the Clinton Chronicles DVD again for a few fast bucks.

But they'll always have BENGHAZI.......

Repeat after me.....4 dead Americans..4 dead Americans.....4 dead Americans.....

 

[tigerfan482]

He won't answer questions or provide information on the following.


- Fast and Furious
- Benghazi
- IRS targeting Obama enemies
- ObamaCare -- how can the President change the law when it was passed by Congress.
- Justice Department targeting the AP
- Justice Department targeting James Rosen, wiretapping his parents
- Holder committing perjury in testimony before Congress regarding Rosen
- Sebelius violating the Hatch Act
- The use of private emails and fake names to conduct official government business, therefore making it difficult if not impossible for Congress to perform their duties in checks and balances of the executive branch
- New Black Panthers -- the federal government now officially looks the other way when disruptive blacks cause voters uneasiness at the polls
- I want to know who hacked into Sharyl Attkisson's computer. Did the Justice Department do it?
- Instead of capturing and getting information from terrorists -- why does Obama just kill them and anyone else that is around them?
- Why does the Obama Administration crack down on whistleblowers so much ... more than any other US President?

There are a plethora of facts on all of the above points. You simply have to learn how to use Google. What you appear to instead be complaining about is a lack of facts that support your theories that somehow Obama is some criminal and his administration is out to destroy America. I would complain to if there was nothing factual to support a position I so adamantly and blindly took. But make sure to write your Republican buddies. If they keep laser focused on these issues and keeping issuing subpoenas (sometimes three or four times) for the same information they've already received, they may find something in the tens of thousands of documents and e-mails they've received on the topics to twist and try to pass off as supporting their position. Maybe someday they might find something. But I highly doubt it. I'm guessing after 6 years of being a do nothing House, they'll find themselves with boxes of documents, piles of conspiracy theories and accusations, but nothing of substance (and no meaningful legislation in the process) to show for it.