Callum
Booyah!
- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Posts
- 2,706
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Gerstein and Robarts
- Website
- www.thestar.com
^ That's quite a statement, blaming the government. People need to have some personal accountability. There's no "one source" to blame. Second-rate universities that are basically diploma mills are to blame, faculties are to blame, the economy is to blame, improper regulation is to blame, but, most importantly, students themselves are to be blamed. No one forced you, or anyone else, a gun to their head to sign off on student loans. Yes, it's stupidly expensive and people should be actively encouraged to seek opportunities elsewhere. Why not vocational schools? As an example, Canada is bleeding tradespeople. There are not enough plumbers, electricians, welders, mechanics etc to fill the void of retiring baby-boomers. Grants are literally thrown at people. In Ontario, you can wipe 90% - yes, NINETY PERCENT - of your college expenses just by gaining an apprenticeship in a trade via government incentives.
We have this warped notion of the need to attend university, rather than the reality that it's incredibly unnecessary for a lot of careers. There are so many students and graduates of universities in Canada that it's the most educated country on the planet, and people can't find jobs, or can't be employed because of ludicrous requirements.
A job in my local paper wants someone to be an assistant manager at a factory warehouse. They want you to have a degree, for $12/hr, and five years of experience using Microsoft Office. Five years? You can master that shit in less than a month. Let's examine some mathematics behind this. If you max out your student loans in Ontario, which is capped at roughly 12k a year, you'll have approximately 48k in student debt. With an interest rate of 3.5%, and the standard repayment rate of 96 months (8 years), the student will have to pay $634 a month to pay back their loans. So, by making $12/hr the student will make a gross of $1920 before taxation, which is probably minimal (I don't know the tax bracket rate off the top of my head). So, let's assume (for simplicity) they'll lose $400 of that to taxes. That's $1520 a month in net income. From personal experience apartments in Toronto - for something decent - are around $900 to start. $900 (rent, no utilities) + $634 (monthly loan repayment) = $1534. $1520-$1534 = $14 shortfall. No food or bills or personal expenses tossed in. Can't afford to live. Working while in school would obviously offset the cost, perhaps halving the $634 to $317, which is more affordable. Yet, since an undergraduate degree is about as common as toilet paper, how are the students going to afford graduate studies to become competitive against their fellow students? They likely aren't. This is where I foresee the collapse in student debt -- we're going to have indebted BAs/BScs so commonplace that people cannot afford to progress even further into graduate studies for something that we, culturally/educationally, see as necessary (the graduate degree, when we eventually see an undergraduate degree as useless).
Until we wipe the absurdity within job recruitment itself, and the cultural importance we place upon post-secondary education, we aren't going to progress on the political end of realistic education reformation. Perhaps a temporary fix would be government subsidization toward 'useful degrees', much like how the current subsidized education plan in militaries work. An example: a free-ride for those intelligent enough to pursue an engineering degree. Once such spots are claimed, a different degree stream in a different year is sponsored. Naturally, this would kill any hope of obtaining an arts degree, but that's an entire discussion into itself...
(Oh, and free grants and scholarships are available to ANYONE with an Internet connection. Come on, learn to Google.)
We have this warped notion of the need to attend university, rather than the reality that it's incredibly unnecessary for a lot of careers. There are so many students and graduates of universities in Canada that it's the most educated country on the planet, and people can't find jobs, or can't be employed because of ludicrous requirements.
A job in my local paper wants someone to be an assistant manager at a factory warehouse. They want you to have a degree, for $12/hr, and five years of experience using Microsoft Office. Five years? You can master that shit in less than a month. Let's examine some mathematics behind this. If you max out your student loans in Ontario, which is capped at roughly 12k a year, you'll have approximately 48k in student debt. With an interest rate of 3.5%, and the standard repayment rate of 96 months (8 years), the student will have to pay $634 a month to pay back their loans. So, by making $12/hr the student will make a gross of $1920 before taxation, which is probably minimal (I don't know the tax bracket rate off the top of my head). So, let's assume (for simplicity) they'll lose $400 of that to taxes. That's $1520 a month in net income. From personal experience apartments in Toronto - for something decent - are around $900 to start. $900 (rent, no utilities) + $634 (monthly loan repayment) = $1534. $1520-$1534 = $14 shortfall. No food or bills or personal expenses tossed in. Can't afford to live. Working while in school would obviously offset the cost, perhaps halving the $634 to $317, which is more affordable. Yet, since an undergraduate degree is about as common as toilet paper, how are the students going to afford graduate studies to become competitive against their fellow students? They likely aren't. This is where I foresee the collapse in student debt -- we're going to have indebted BAs/BScs so commonplace that people cannot afford to progress even further into graduate studies for something that we, culturally/educationally, see as necessary (the graduate degree, when we eventually see an undergraduate degree as useless).
Until we wipe the absurdity within job recruitment itself, and the cultural importance we place upon post-secondary education, we aren't going to progress on the political end of realistic education reformation. Perhaps a temporary fix would be government subsidization toward 'useful degrees', much like how the current subsidized education plan in militaries work. An example: a free-ride for those intelligent enough to pursue an engineering degree. Once such spots are claimed, a different degree stream in a different year is sponsored. Naturally, this would kill any hope of obtaining an arts degree, but that's an entire discussion into itself...
(Oh, and free grants and scholarships are available to ANYONE with an Internet connection. Come on, learn to Google.)

