naked gent
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2006
- Posts
- 2,719
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
When the Moors conquered the Iberian Peninsula, the people were basically happy to not be ruled by the Visigoths anymore.
Well I guess it happened that way but I'll always remember my high school history teacher joking that the Spanish invited the Moors in to liberate them and they stayed for 700 yrs.
Israel got started at first by Jews coming peacefully and buying land.
Whether the reaction was positive isn't terribly relevant, because the Jews came legitimately, acquired land legitimately, defended themselves legitimately, and trusted a promise from the international community.
Acquisition of property by mutual agreement is a right common to all -- the people didn't have to sell to the Jews, but they did.
If you're saying that if a group of people purchase enough land that they can then declare themselves a country good luck with that theory.
I'm guessing that to an Arab your assumption that the British had any authority to give anything to anybody would be disputed.
You really seem to be smoking something illegal. Come to Israel, we'll teach you how our country was made. How often do I have to tell Americans, you don't have to be apologetics for us!!!!! Transfer was official policy of the Zionist ideology from day one, our own military's archives dispute everything you said above. Israel doesn't need your fabricated history to gain legitimacy, Israel is here to stay, with or without anybody's acceptance. Land acquired through purchase makes a very small percentage of what became Israel.
Land belongs to those who can defend it. Title to the land may be nice but historically beside the point. Had the Arabs been viewed as a stronger, more unified force or even had some recent history of ruling themselves perhaps their land wouldn't have been ripe for the picking.......although like the American Indian they were sparsely populated in the land they called their own.

