The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Israeli Government Ads Warn Against Marrying Non-Jews

I'm sorry, but what am I missing here? Jews have long encouraged marriage among themselves and I see nothing at all wrong with that.
I see no problem in mommy and daddy saying "Son, if you many anything else than a fellow jew/catholic/muslim you are dead to me".
But here it is the GOVERNMENT of a STATE telling it's people only to marry and befriend people of a certain FAITH.
So far .. this sounds like a theocracy to me :confused:
Did you read the other link that I posted? About the military rabbis?


No government has the right to decide who gets to marry who. That is a bad path to go down.
They don't decide it yet, but well .. they are trying to stir in a direction. And yep you are right.
What if in the US gay marriage would be legal, but the government would spend a lot of money and run ads on tv and the newspapers or billboards around the country telling people that gay marriage is bad and that every guy should marry a girl?
 
"Unfortunate hyperbole"... Interesting aversion of the eyes there...

I am simply attempting to draw for you the obvious parallels here. Your characterisation of them is what I would call hyperbole, but I suppose it is an American thing. Anyone who disagrees with you must be hysterical. Whatever...

The point is, as I have already stated, I am not againt the idea as a whole. I am just annoyed that such an idea can be espoused by one group but seen as racism when espoused by anyone else. I am sorry you cannot see this.

Let me ask you, where are you from? Where's your family from?

Are your ignorant and laughable comments traits of your ethnic group? No, I think it's just you. Actually, I'm sure of it.

You've basically stated you disagree with the entire idea of intermarriage, and that's okay. People campaign against it all the time. Did you know that in Saudi Arabia, you have to convert to Islam before you're even a citizen? What makes you think that Jews as a collective group are given a free pass at this particular subject? I see plenty of people (Jews and non-Jews alike) criticizing Israel all the time.
 
^ Swiss are in no position -- none at all -- to make judgments on what Jews do or do not do. The Swiss culture of consorting with Nazis is a disgrace. We have many shortcomings here in America, but we know at least most of the time when do to the right thing. That is a quality the Swiss never have acquired.

I will again repeat for you that the Swiss have nothing to do with the topic of this thread, so I fail to see your point or any reason to answer your ridiculous statement. Your ignorance of the Swiss denies you any right to say anyhing about them. I am certain that the closest you have ever been to Switzerland is opening a package of Swiss Miss hot chocolate, so stick to discussing topics of which you at least have a rudimentary knowledge, ok?
 
I'm sorry, but that's the first time I've ever heard this. Asia's big enough -- leave the Middle East out of it, m'kay?

Except that the Middle East is in Asia. What continent did you think it was in?

The American education system at its best strikes again...
 
Let me ask you, where are you from? Where's your family from?

Are your ignorant and laughable comments traits of your ethnic group? No, I think it's just you. Actually, I'm sure of it.

You've basically stated you disagree with the entire idea of intermarriage, and that's okay. People campaign against it all the time. Did you know that in Saudi Arabia, you have to convert to Islam before you're even a citizen? What makes you think that Jews as a collective group are given a free pass at this particular subject? I see plenty of people (Jews and non-Jews alike) criticizing Israel all the time.

In answer to your first question, I live in Switzerland and France but was born in Cuba and raised in Argentina, Paris and New York. My family lives in Argentina and Paris.

In answer to your secod question, probably not. They are the result of having been ll over the world and never having encountered such duplicity and hypocrisy as that which arises whenever the discsssion of Jews and Israel comes up. It has been over 60 years since th end of World War II and the entire world is still suffering from this faux "collective guilt" nonsense which somehow precludes anyone from being critical of these people without being called hysterical or ignorant or laughable.

I find it ironic that as the majority of Americans would not know how to locate Israel on a map (as has been demonstrated here already), it is always you Americans who like to call everyone else ignorant. That is a very American trait and to what I was referring in my earlier post. Deal with it. If you have ever been to Europe you will see that I am not the only one who believes this way.
 
He's clearly got issues about lots of things, but certainly he seems to have HUGE problems with Jews and with America.

Yeah, well I have several Jewish friends, and this dude attacking them is attacking me too. I'd love for him to say this shit to my face, especially the stuff about Americans.

Clearly, he has no problem with governments of countries campaigning against intermarriage. He said that he is against it himself (he's also treating Jews as if they're a race----- like the Nazis did:eek:)

What he has a problem with is when Israel does it.
 
Yeah, well I have several Jewish friends, and this dude attacking them is attacking me too. I'd love for him to say this shit to my face, especially the stuff about Americans.

Clearly, he has no problem with governments of countries campaigning against intermarriage. He said that he is against it himself (he's also treating Jews as if they're a race----- like the Nazis did:eek:)

What he has a problem with is when Israel does it.

First of all, this "dude" is not attacking anyone. That macho pseudo-threatening nonsense of yours does explain a great deal to me about you, however.

Clearly, I actually do think there is a problem with governments advocated or campaigning against intermarriage. ANY government, and that includes your sacred Jewish one. Such matters should not lie within any government's purview. This is a perfect example of what I had written previously. I stated that when the Nazis were doing the exact thing the Israelis are doing, everyone was up in arms. But when these people are doing it, I am suddenly accused of having problems with Jews in general simply for having expressed my disagreement with the topic matter at hand. You and your buddy there have gone off on a psycho tangent that has nothing to do with what I was saying. And you have proven my point. Love it when that happens.

Oh, and for the record:

The Jews (Hebrew: יְהוּדִים‎, Yehudim), also known as the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#World_War_II_and_the_Holocaust

Ergo, they are a race - your disagreement with the Nazis' classification of them as such notwithstanding.
 
You are threatened by one-sixth of the Knesset of Israel? My my... Well I'm not.

The global Jewish population is given anywhere between 12 million and 18 million. There are about as many gays in the US as there are Jews in the world.

I never said that I was threatened by them. I simply corrected your assertion that they were a negligble influence in the Knesset. One-sixth is not negligble, and their numbers have been growing consistently over the years.
 
In answer to your first question, I live in Switzerland and France but was born in Cuba and raised in Argentina, Paris and New York. My family lives in Argentina and Paris.

In answer to your secod question, probably not. They are the result of having been ll over the world and never having encountered such duplicity and hypocrisy as that which arises whenever the discsssion of Jews and Israel comes up. It has been over 60 years since th end of World War II and the entire world is still suffering from this faux "collective guilt" nonsense which somehow precludes anyone from being critical of these people without being called hysterical or ignorant or laughable.

If you think there isn't duplicity and hypocrisy everywhere you are at best naive. These are not traits invented by nor unique to Americans and Israelis. I would suggest that as I have you sit down and talk with a Houlocost survivor. I have been to the Houlocost museum in Israel and to see what was done takes away your ability to even speak for a while. To this very day there are people all over the world whose sole purpose in life is their elimination from the planet. One of the key components to this is jeolousy. Jews are on the whole industrious and successful in any country they land in. Even when knocked to the bottom they rise up work hard and succeed.

I find it ironic that as the majority of Americans would not know how to locate Israel on a map (as has been demonstrated here already), it is always you Americans who like to call everyone else ignorant. That is a very American trait and to what I was referring in my earlier post. Deal with it. If you have ever been to Europe you will see that I am not the only one who believes this way.

I find it ironic that a Cuban expat whose home country was mired in deep poverty and one of the most dictatorial governments on the planet would be concerned with America and Israel instead of the liberation of the Cuban people. I have many Israeli friends and have spent some time there they are wonderful people and you could not know them and not love them. They have taken a desert wasteland and turned into a paradise, now many want to take it away and take advantage of their labors. I guess world travel alone doesn't always eliminate ignorance. So you are right because others in Europe agree with you. If it weren't for the actions of some Europeans to eliminate Jews they wouldn't have their homeland. Millions of Americans died because of what some Europeans thought sixty years or so ago. Views such as yours are what caused the situation that required their sacrifice. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat its mistakes.
 
First of all, this "dude" is not attacking anyone. That macho pseudo-threatening nonsense of yours does explain a great deal to me about you, however.

Clearly, I actually do think there is a problem with governments advocated or campaigning against intermarriage. ANY government, and that includes your sacred Jewish one. Such matters should not lie within any government's purview. This is a perfect example of what I had written previously. I stated that when the Nazis were doing the exact thing the Israelis are doing, everyone was up in arms. But when these people are doing it, I am suddenly accused of having problems with Jews in general simply for having expressed my disagreement with the topic matter at hand. You and your buddy there have gone off on a psycho tangent that has nothing to do with what I was saying. And you have proven my point. Love it when that happens.

Oh, and for the record:

The Jews (Hebrew: יְהוּדִים‎, Yehudim), also known as the Jewish people, are an ethnoreligious group originating in the Israelites or Hebrews of the Ancient Near East. The Jewish ethnicity, nationality, and religion are strongly interrelated, as Judaism is the traditional faith of the Jewish nation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#World_War_II_and_the_Holocaust

Ergo, they are a race - your disagreement with the Nazis' classification of them as such notwithstanding.

The Nazis were not doing the same thing the Israelis are currently doing. The advertisement campaign in Israel is clearly being driven by the religious fanatics in the Likud party. Yes, I disagree with the campaign, but there are many Israelis who don't agree with the ads and the country is a Democracy and progress can be made with the right people (it seemed Livni was onto something, but she lost by a narrow margin).

Did I ever accuse you of having a problem with Jews in general? No, and I don't believe you do. I accused you of singling out Israel for things countries do all the time. Remember, there are other news organizations out there than Al-Jazeera.

And then you went off spouting a quote like this:
"It has been over 60 years since th end of World War II and the entire world is still suffering from this faux "collective guilt" nonsense which somehow precludes anyone from being critical of these people without being called hysterical or ignorant or laughable. "

I've heard shit like this before. If you think the point of learning about WWII is to make you feel guilty, then you are ignorant.

And you clearly mentioned that "it's time for Israel to follow the rules that every other country in the world does."

If Israel followed your advice, they would turn the West Bank and Gaza Strip into a wasteland, because nearly every country on this Earth has done that to another group at some point or another.

Nice talking to you dude.
 
If you think there isn't duplicity and hypocrisy everywhere you are at best naive. These are not traits invented by nor unique to Americans and Israelis. I would suggest that as I have you sit down and talk with a Houlocost survivor. I have been to the Houlocost museum in Israel and to see what was done takes away your ability to even speak for a while. To this very day there are people all over the world whose sole purpose in life is their elimination from the planet. One of the key components to this is jeolousy. Jews are on the whole industrious and successful in any country they land in. Even when knocked to the bottom they rise up work hard and succeed.

What a ridiculous statement. That is not what I said. I simply stated that when this particular subject comes up, the duplicity arises from those two camps without fail or hesitation; your post being a great case in point.

And while I am thrilled to tears with the moving experience you must have had at the Holocaust Museum, it is not germane to either the point I was trying to make or the subject of the thread.


I find it ironic that a Cuban expat whose home country was mired in deep poverty and one of the most dictatorial governments on the planet would be concerned with America and Israel instead of the liberation of the Cuban people. I have many Israeli friends and have spent some time there they are wonderful people and you could not know them and not love them. They have taken a desert wasteland and turned into a paradise, now many want to take it away and take advantage of their labors. I guess world travel alone doesn't always eliminate ignorance. So you are right because others in Europe agree with you. If it weren't for the actions of some Europeans to eliminate Jews they wouldn't have their homeland. Millions of Americans died because of what some Europeans thought sixty years or so ago. Views such as yours are what caused the situation that required their sacrifice. Those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat its mistakes.

First of all, I only spent the first three years of my life in Cuba. I have no particular attachment to it, nor if I did, would that preclude my interest in other parts of the world. As it is America and Israel that cause the most problems in the world, everything about them affects the entire world, which includes me. So please do not presume to tell me what should or should not concern me.

As it stands, it is Israel which is in the process of taking things away, both from the Palestinians and the American taxpayers, without whom it would not be able to accomplish all of the acts against international law that it has been perpetrating over the years.

Your view of history is somewhat skewed, and that is not unusual for Americans. All of Europe suffered under Hitler and the Nazis, not just the Jews. The Jews just have better PR and more of an interest in dragging out their past suffering on a daily basis for all the world to see. The rest of Europe rebuilt itself after the war and progressed. Only Israel's very existence depends upon its constant wailing and moaning about what happened so many years ago.

Without even considering military deaths, the civilian death toll in Europe that was not Jewish was tremendous as well. But you do not wax eloquently on their plucky bravery and ingenuity for rebuilding their countries and not relying on American aid or needing big lobbies to twist the arms of foreign governments to keep them progressing.

According to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

Austria: 58,700 civilian deaths (not including Jewish deaths)
Belgium: 49,600
Bulgaria: 3,000
Czechoslovakia: 43,000
Denmark: 1000
Estonia: 50,000
Finland: 2000
France: 267,000
Germany: Between 840,000 and 2.8 million
Greece: 700,500
Hungary: 80,000
Italy: 145,100
Latvia: 147,000
Lithuania: 212.000
Luxembourg: 1,300
Malta: 1,500
Netherlands: 176,000
Norway: 5,800
Poland: 2.38 million - 2.58 million
Roumania: 64,000
Soviet Union: Between 12 and 14 million
Sweden: 2000
United Kingdom: 67,100
Yugoslavia: 514,000

In the entire war, the official tally is that 5,752,400 Jews died during the period of World War II, while between 34.5 and 47 million non-Jews died. Explain to me again why we only care about those plucky Jews?

You will also note that for your claim of "millions" of American deaths, that throughout the entire war (most of which America fought in Asia anyway), America suffered casualties of only 418,500 in their entirety. A bit of an exaggeration there, wouldn't you say?

And they did not die to protect the Jews, but rather because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour. I can guarantee you that if the Japanese had never attacked America, we would not even be having this conversation right now, because America did not even want to become involved in what it considered to be a "foreign" war. They only agreed to become involved when the Japanese involved them. JUst because it all worked out for them in the end does not add any altruism to their motives. Americans have always acted only in self-interest. Or in the interest of Israel, of course.

And please do not feed me the Zionist propaganda about how the Jews turned a "desert wasteland" into a "paradise". They had to dislodge a great many Arabs to get that so called "wasteland", and a great deal more of it is wasteland now, since Israel decided to turn many Arabs' farms into a great big apartheid wall or into settlements.

I am so happy for you that you have Israeli friends. Hoorah for you. But again, this has nothing to do with the point that I was trying to make. For the record, I have known Israeli people and I cannot say that the feeling I have for them could be described as love. I visited one of the illegal settlement outposts in my more progressive thinking days when I was at university and I must say that the people whom I encountered were hateful, angry, bile-filled bitter people in whom I could not sense one drop of "love".

I am unhappy that I have had to go so far off topic here, but there needed to be some clarification into what was being bandied about by you people who believe that hyperbole and exaggeration is acceptable debating procedure. It is not.
 
The Nazis were not doing the same thing the Israelis are currently doing.

Actually they were. They believed that the Aryan race was in danger of elimination (sound familiar?), and that the only way to save it was to prevent intermarriage and allow only marriage between Aryans.

Did I ever accuse you of having a problem with Jews in general? No, and I don't believe you do.

That is very kind of you. But are you sure this post was not yours?

Yeah, well I have several Jewish friends, and this dude attacking them is attacking me too. I'd love for him to say this shit to my face, especially the stuff about Americans.

This was in response to another poster's enlightened observation:

He's clearly got issues about lots of things, but certainly he seems to have HUGE problems with Jews and with America.

So forgive me if I was led to the conclusion that you were accusing me of having a problem with Jews. My late partner's in-laws in Paris are Jewish and they treat me as though I were their own family. We are all very close. I do have a problem with Israel. But not Jews in general.

I accused you of singling out Israel for things countries do all the time. Remember, there are other news organizations out there than Al-Jazeera.

I do not know where you got the idea that my one and only news source was Al-Jazeera, but I will assume that comment to have been gratuitous and facetious, because I have never even discussed with you from whence I obtain my news. For the record, it is from various English, Spanish, French, German and Italian news sources from around the world. I believe that I try to maintain a global perspective on all of my positions on world issues.

I've heard shit like this before. If you think the point of learning about WWII is to make you feel guilty, then you are ignorant.

You see! That was all you needed to do from the start was to use vulgarities and name-calling to express your point. Now I not only understand your position better, but I respect it more.:rolleyes:

And you clearly mentioned that "it's time for Israel to follow the rules that every other country in the world does."

If Israel followed your advice, they would turn the West Bank and Gaza Strip into a wasteland, because nearly every country on this Earth has done that to another group at some point or another.

Well as that is exactly what they have been doing, we should both consider ourselves satisfied, I suppose, eh?
 
Zionist propaganda???

oh my

Theodor Herzl, the father of the Zionist movement in the late 19th Century supported the reestablishment of a homeland for the Jewish People in Palestine. The only way this could be properly justified was by his people selling the idea of Palestine being a "land without people for a people without land". It was a complete lie. Ergo: Zionist propaganda.
 
What a ridiculous statement. That is not what I said. I simply stated that when this particular subject comes up, the duplicity arises from those two camps without fail or hesitation; your post being a great case in point.

And while I am thrilled to tears with the moving experience you must have had at the Holocaust Museum, it is not germane to either the point I was trying to make or the subject of the thread.

It is completely germane. To understand Israelis and Jewish people you must understand what was done to them.




First of all, I only spent the first three years of my life in Cuba. I have no particular attachment to it, nor if I did, would that preclude my interest in other parts of the world.

Once again personal experience rears its ugly head again. I have a coworker that rents a room from me he is first generation Cuban American. He has seen first hand his relatives that escaped Castro's totolitarian dictatorship. The Cuban people have been oppressed for generations now. Europeans seem to love Castro and ignore the attrocities he is responsible for. Much like they ignored Hitler under pacifists like Neville Chamberlain.

As it is America and Israel that cause the most problems in the world, everything about them affects the entire world, which includes me. So please do not presume to tell me what should or should not concern me.

Are you serious? Israel and America cause the most problems in the world. Tell me which country does more to help it's enemies when natural disasters occurs. Tell me what other country donates more to charity and treating aids in Africa than America. Tell me what other country in the Middle East other than Israel is a self ruled democracy with freedom for women and other religions. Tell me what Europe has done lately to fight totalitarian dictators.

As it stands, it is Israel which is in the process of taking things away, both from the Palestinians and the American taxpayers, without whom it would not be able to accomplish all of the acts against international law that it has been perpetrating over the years.

Your view of history is somewhat skewed, and that is not unusual for Americans. All of Europe suffered under Hitler and the Nazis, not just the Jews. The Jews just have better PR and more of an interest in dragging out their past suffering on a daily basis for all the world to see. The rest of Europe rebuilt itself after the war and progressed. Only Israel's very existence depends upon its constant wailing and moaning about what happened so many years ago.

Ever heard of the Marshall Plan? Europe rebuilt itself indeed but not without significant help from America. We forgave huge amounts of debt after both world wars. When was the last time the same graciousness was extended toward us. I suggest you read some of Churchill's speeches after the war. France helped America win independence and America helped liberate France during WW II. France and England and much of Europe are on the verge of a muslim takeover of their government and cultures. Sharia law is slowly being accepted into European culture.

Without even considering military deaths, the civilian death toll in Europe that was not Jewish was tremendous as well. But you do not wax eloquently on their plucky bravery and ingenuity for rebuilding their countries and not relying on American aid or needing big lobbies to twist the arms of foreign governments to keep them progressing.

Of course it was great but they were fighting a war for their own land. America was fighting for freedom and her allies. We were attacked without provocation at Pearl Harbor and the war would have been longer and far more brutal without our help both militarily and financially. There is no way to know but the war could have been lost entirely. European ambivalence was one of the things that empowered Hitler. England and France both were content to ignore Hitler. There ambivalence early on caused millions of deaths that could likely have been avoided.

According to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II_casualties

Austria: 58,700 civilian deaths (not including Jewish deaths)
Belgium: 49,600
Bulgaria: 3,000
Czechoslovakia: 43,000
Denmark: 1000
Estonia: 50,000
Finland: 2000
France: 267,000
Germany: Between 840,000 and 2.8 million
Greece: 700,500
Hungary: 80,000
Italy: 145,100
Latvia: 147,000
Lithuania: 212.000
Luxembourg: 1,300
Malta: 1,500
Netherlands: 176,000
Norway: 5,800
Poland: 2.38 million - 2.58 million
Roumania: 64,000
Soviet Union: Between 12 and 14 million
Sweden: 2000
United Kingdom: 67,100
Yugoslavia: 514,000

In the entire war, the official tally is that 5,752,400 Jews died during the period of World War II, while between 34.5 and 47 million non-Jews died. Explain to me again why we only care about those plucky Jews?


They didn't die fighting a war. They were slaughtered for being Jewish. Hitler wanted to wipe them from the face of the earth. After the war was over they were put on boats and no country would accept them. That is one of the reasons they were given their own homeland. They were then attacked by the Arabs almost from the beginning. They had to fight to keep their homeland and still do to this day.

You will also note that for your claim of "millions" of American deaths, that throughout the entire war (most of which America fought in Asia anyway), America suffered casualties of only 418,500 in their entirety. A bit of an exaggeration there, wouldn't you say?

And they did not die to protect the Jews, but rather because the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour. I can guarantee you that if the Japanese had never attacked America, we would not even be having this conversation right now, because America did not even want to become involved in what it considered to be a "foreign" war. They only agreed to become involved when the Japanese involved them. JUst because it all worked out for them in the end does not add any altruism to their motives. Americans have always acted only in self-interest. Or in the interest of Israel, of course.

And please do not feed me the Zionist propaganda about how the Jews turned a "desert wasteland" into a "paradise". They had to dislodge a great many Arabs to get that so called "wasteland", and a great deal more of it is wasteland now, since Israel decided to turn many Arabs' farms into a great big apartheid wall or into settlements.

I have been to farms that were created in the middle of the desert. This was not done by the Arabs it was done by the Israelis.

I am so happy for you that you have Israeli friends. Hoorah for you. But again, this has nothing to do with the point that I was trying to make. For the record, I have known Israeli people and I cannot say that the feeling I have for them could be described as love. I visited one of the illegal settlement outposts in my more progressive thinking days when I was at university and I must say that the people whom I encountered were hateful, angry, bile-filled bitter people in whom I could not sense one drop of "love".

I am unhappy that I have had to go so far off topic here, but there needed to be some clarification into what was being bandied about by you people who believe that hyperbole and exaggeration is acceptable debating procedure. It is not.

I have rarely heard the time Zionist from anyone other than antisemitic people which you very much seem to be. Enjoy your smug, self superior hatred of two of the brightest bastions for freedom and democracy in the history of mankind. I feel sorry for you.
 
Uh-huh. Yewbetcha! :rolleyes:


334213.jpg

I know that as a New Yorker you have a problem with separating a person's deep disdain for Israel and his feelings for Jews in general. I lived in New York for many years, and I still recall the many many many times I was called an anti-Semite simply for having the audacity to question Israel on one point or another. I do not blame you. It is the brainwashing that one is forced to go through in order to live in New York. I lived it too, and I am glad to be out of there.
 
It is completely germane. To understand Israelis and Jewish people you must understand what was done to them.

I understand a great deal more about them than you think. I just do not blindly worship them as so many others do. All of us come from some background that has suffered some indignity somewhere in time. But we have moved on. They are the only ones who have not and will not.

As a black woman growing up in Cuba under Batista's regime, my mother endured a great many hardships and was targeted for some very harsh treatment by everyone whom she encountered. She then was treated like less than dirt and sent away unceremoniously when my father brought her home to his family in Argentina. Do you think she still wanders about wailing and moaning about how badly she was treated in life? And it was less than sixty years ago, and she was not mercifully killed. She still has to live with the memories and humiliation of what she suffered.

People suffer. Check your history books. The Jews were not the first and they have not been the last to do so. are you crying for the Bosnian or Albanian Muslims who were exterminated by the Serbs in the 90's? I doubt it.

Once again personal experience rears its ugly head again. I have a coworker that rents a room from me he is first generation Cuban American. He has seen first hand his relatives that escaped Castro's totolitarian dictatorship. The Cuban people have been oppressed for generations now. Europeans seem to love Castro and ignore the attrocities he is responsible for. Much like they ignored Hitler under pacifists like Neville Chamberlain.

Two things here: Firstly, there is both good and bad in Castro's regime as in any other. I do not love Castro nor have I been to Cuba since leaving when I was three. I have, as a matter of principle thought it distasteful to visit there as long as the people of Cuba are not permitted to enjoy the same amenities as the tourists. Thankfully, Raúl Castro has begun implementing changes to those policies and allowing Cuban citizens more freedoms. Change takes time, but at least he has recognised that change is needed and has attempted to begin the process. Not quite as self-satisfied as certain countries, I would say.

Secondly, you need to know your history and understand what happened in the early thirties to be able to properly appreciate what Chamberlain was trying to do. The greates war ever known to man had only ended 15 years earlier. Neither the British nor the French, who had borne the brunt of that war, wee in a hurry to get into another one. Bad decisions were made and what happened happened. I would still prefer a man who would rather save lives and keep people out of danger than a reckless wanton idiot like your Bush who joyously pushed people into it.

Are you serious? Israel and America cause the most problems in the world. Tell me which country does more to help it's enemies when natural disasters occurs. Tell me what other country donates more to charity and treating aids in Africa than America. Tell me what other country in the Middle East other than Israel is a self ruled democracy with freedom for women and other religions. Tell me what Europe has done lately to fight totalitarian dictators.

I do not deny that at times America can be quite a benevolent force in the world. That does not, however, eliminate the fact that the entire world is under a terrorist threat primarily becase the United States persists and insists upon blindly supporting an arrogant little nuclear-armed country that has no regard for international law or for human life in general.

As far as your last statemnt, have you forgotten that only Europe was involved in the wars in the former Yugoslavia in the 90's? Europe is on the front lines in standing against people like Mugabe in Zimbabwe and Bashir in Sudan (since the US dropped the ball as usual on countries that will not make it rich), as well as the many myriad other interests in Africa and Asia that Americans do not even think of because they have no financial interests there.

Ever heard of the Marshall Plan? Europe rebuilt itself indeed but not without significant help from America. We forgave huge amounts of debt after both world wars. When was the last time the same graciousness was extended toward us. I suggest you read some of Churchill's speeches after the war. France helped America win independence and America helped liberate France during WW II. France and England and much of Europe are on the verge of a muslim takeover of their government and cultures. Sharia law is slowly being accepted into European culture.

Quite right. From 1948-1952 Western Europe benefitted greatly from the Marshall Plan. This was not, however, an act of altruism, but rather an act of necessity. The US was afraid of Europe falling under the Soviet Bloc and was trying to prevent that. Eastern Europe, you will recall, did not get a penny from the Marshall Plan. Interesting, wouldn't you say?

After 1952, Western Europe went it alone. When will Israel, I wonder? 60 years later and they are still grabbing at Mummy's teet. And biting it quite frequently if people like Jonathan Pollard and all of the other Mossad spying activity against the US (its benefactor) is any indication. Typical, I would say...

As far as your claims about the Muslims and Sharia law, I wonder that I should not send this post over to M Le Pen and his ilk. They would be thrilled to read such nonsense, as they often put it out themselves.

Sharia law is not even tolerated in Europe, let alone accepted. There are several cases presently being tried in the Netherlands and France alone that I am aware of, in which Muslims have applied Sharia law quite against the laws of their host country and have been prosecuted for it. If these incidences have become more prevalent, it is only because immigration from the countries which hold such practices remains fluid. But I can assure you, there is no "takeover" forthcoming from the Muslims. They have FAR less influence in Europe than the Jews have in the US, I can assure you. There is no Muslim equivalent to AIPAC or WJC with which I am familiar.

Of course it was great but they were fighting a war for their own land. America was fighting for freedom and her allies. We were attacked without provocation at Pearl Harbor and the war would have been longer and far more brutal without our help both militarily and financially. There is no way to know but the war could have been lost entirely. European ambivalence was one of the things that empowered Hitler. England and France both were content to ignore Hitler. There ambivalence early on caused millions of deaths that could likely have been avoided.

Pure propagandist nonsense. If America and her red white and blue were truly interested in fighting for freedom, she would not have waited to be attacked before entering the war. She would simply have entered when first asked by Britain at the start of the war. Instead, all of America's biggest banks engaged in profiteering, lending money to both sides of the war and insisting on respect for American neutrality. Hardly admirable.

They didn't die fighting a war. They were slaughtered for being Jewish. Hitler wanted to wipe them from the face of the earth. After the war was over they were put on boats and no country would accept them. That is one of the reasons they were given their own homeland. They were then attacked by the Arabs almost from the beginning. They had to fight to keep their homeland and still do to this day.

The numbers I posted for you were civilian and not military deaths. Did you even open the link I provided for you, let alone read it? I again ask: Why are the deaths of 5 million Jews more important than those of 47 million non-Jews?

And as far as the Arabs attacking the Jews when they arrived in Palestine, I will say that if a bunch of strangers came to steal my land, I would kill them too. Only I would have done a far better job at it.

They are not fighting to keep their homeland because no one is fighting them in any significant way.Sure, they use a homemade rocket attack as an excuse to steal more land, murder more children and bulldoze more homes, but that is not fighting for a homeland. That is just plain bullying.

I have been to farms that were created in the middle of the desert. This was not done by the Arabs it was done by the Israelis.

I am not surprised. The Israelis took all of the arable land from the Arabs. Arabs have not had decent land on which to grow farms since 1948. Much of it is now illegal settlements or underneath the apartheid wall.

I have rarely heard the time Zionist from anyone
other than antisemitic people which you very much seem to be. Enjoy your smug, self superior hatred of two of the brightest bastions for freedom and democracy in the history of mankind. I feel sorry for you.

My use of the word Zionist in this instance was in its historical perspective. I am curious, however, that since most lovers of Israel have no problem callling themselves Zionists, as to why you would consider the term to be anti-Semitic...
 
I forgive your unfortunate and inappropriate slam towards Americans ("Your characterisation of them is what I would call hyperbole, but I suppose it is an American thing. Anyone who disagrees with you must be hysterical..."). After all, the Swiss sat-out World War Two, they sat out the liberation of Europe and the concentration camps, they sat out the conflict so they could trade with the Nazis. You know that is true. Don't you lecture me.

:=D: :=D: :=D:


I don't get your post. Must be a suburban Baltimore thing...

It's a drag race....

Now, how many countries in Asia would let that happen?
 
Back
Top