The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Jeans So Baggy and Low the Underwear and Ass (!) Are Exposed.

FunFunk

FunFunk

Sex God
Joined
Aug 8, 2009
Posts
749
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
New York
I'm sure many of you have noticed the subculture of guys wearing low-rise and baggy jeans. While the baggy jeans do nothing for me in and of themselves since the obscure the contours of the ass and conceal hard-ons too well, the fact that they often slip so low as to reveal tight underwear worn around a hot guy's nice ass is quite a turn on.

Better still is when an attractive guy wearing such a style bends over and his asscrack is revealed. I witnessed that just a couple weekends ago when I was at a newsstand. The nice-looking guy (South Asian guy, nicely browned skin, jet black hair, very smooth, twentysomething) who worked there was wearing low-rise baggyish jeans. In the midst of moving stacks of newspapers, he bent over and I witnessed, from just a couple feet away, the beauty of the upper third or so of his bare asscrack. He didn't even seem to notice, much less care and, to my pleasure he didn't adjust his pants. I could've said something smart to him, if I'd thought of something, but I just smiled at him as I paid.

Sights like that just make me want to cup the ass in my hands and have my way with it. :)

How about you guys? Any baggy-jeans/exposed underwear/exposed buns stories you'd like to share? Pics are welcome too.
 
I wear low-rise jeans and occasionally* some underwear is exposed, but never my actual arse.

While waistbands and some level of underwear exposure is so common it is very much de rigueur amongst the dubious youth here in .za, having skin hanging out is extremely, extremely rare.

-d-
*usually
 
ShihTzuTylenol said:
dang it, I thought you'd have pictures lol
Click to expand...

I don't have any pix like that right now, but feel free to post some. I'm sure you'd make a lot of people happy.

Hell, where I live I could probably just walk down a major street or ride a train and sneak a photo of a relatively attractive man (likely an older kid) with baggy, low-rise, falling-down, underwear-definitely-exposed, asscrack-tantalizingly-peeking-out jeans. :D They're just too commonplace. As the old saying goes: A dime a dozen.
 
blackbeltninja said:
I wear low-rise jeans and occasionally* some underwear is exposed, but never my actual arse.

While waistbands and some level of underwear exposure is so common it is very much de rigueur amongst the dubious youth here in .za, having skin hanging out is extremely, extremely rare.

-d-
*usually
Click to expand...

In the US, it used to be that baggy and low-rise jeans didn't reveal much more than the top band of the underwear beneath. Either they wouldn't ride that low or the area in question would be mostly obscured by a long shirt or jacket. But now, it's often the case that most of the underwear-clad butt is visible and occasionally (not very often) the top of the bare asscrack is visible. Just seems logical to assume that, as kids become even more uninhibited we'll start to see more bare ass in public, lol. :D I think that's what they really want to do anyway. And it's what a lot of guys want to see, right? :) Interestingly, for some reason, these boys' front sides always remain completely covered. No hint of exposed dick or pubic hair... :)
 
JarodA said:
I find this gross. In public I'd rather it was left to the imagination. ;)
Click to expand...

Maybe it's a cultural thing. In the US these days we don't seem to leave much to the imagination anymore.

As a fashion/clothing style (if you can call it "fashion") I'll never quite understand the allure of baggy pants, but I do find rather erotic with the right guy.
 
FunFunk said:
Maybe it's a cultural thing. In the US these days we don't seem to leave much to the imagination anymore.

As a fashion/clothing style (if you can call it "fashion") I'll never quite understand the allure of baggy pants, but I do find rather erotic with the right guy.
Click to expand...
No it's done here as well (in New Zealand it's called "butt-sagging" :lol:.

But I find it hotter to check out a guy's ass in some regular shorts or jeans, not baggy overexposed ones. :lol:
 
one time my SEXY as hell roommate was wearing boxer briefs and bent over to pet the cat....his balls and ass were in plain view.

Sagging.jpg


saggingpantsUG.jpg


i think mens butts are equivalent to womens breasts, if they are nice you SHOULD show it off as much as possible lol...
 
Hard-up1 said:
It is an unwelcome sexualization of the public space, not unlike overly exposed breasts or too-obvious penis lines.

No one is questioning the appeal of the human body, especially the anatomy associated with sexual attraction, but the "fashion" is a crude de-evolution of society and deserves to be socially rejected. It is the equivalent of Madonna's stage attire.

Of course there are Bohemian enclaves where it is welcomed and accepted by adults, but I'm glad it has failed to gain traction among the great majority. There will be accusations of prude or hypocrisy, but there is a necessary difference between prudishness and prudence. Yes, the human body is natural, but so is defecation, and we do not welcome it into public view either.

The subject title of the thread captured most people's sentiments quite succinctly with "ass exposed."
Click to expand...

i totally agree.
 
Do saggers realize they are the butt of jokes!? ;)

I was laughing at this young sagger guy not long ago...he was pushing a stroller along the sidewalk with one hand, the other hand was clutched to his belt to hold up his pants. He had ratty faded underwear on. He had to shimmy his hips as he walked because his thighs were bound together, and the stroller kept veering to the right because of the way he was walking as well as only pushing it with one hand. It was ridiculous how much effort he had to go through! :lol:

I'll never understand it either.
 
They do nothing for me. I just don't understand how the plumber look has become in style.:confused:
 
FunFunk said:
In the US, it used to be that baggy and low-rise jeans didn't reveal much more than the top band of the underwear beneath.
Click to expand...

Mine is wasitband and another inch or so, I reckon; nothing like those photographs. Just looking at them I fully understand why whichever town made this sort of exposure a misdemeanour (or whatever it was) did that. Someone should make a hidden-camera series where some dude walks past these cretins and yanks their pants off completely.

I also find it annoying when people dress like this and their undies are generic and/or dull. That should be a crime in itself.

I do make a point of staring at these guys, though, and when they give me lip asking why I'm looking I tell them "put your arse away if you don't want people staring at it, dick-head."

-d-
 
Hard-up1 said:
It is an unwelcome sexualization of the public space, not unlike overly exposed breasts or too-obvious penis lines.
Click to expand...

I LOVE overly exposed breasts and VPL........they make shopping VERY worthwhile........and fun....... (!)(!) ....... :D
 
is the beach, or pool areas "sexualized?" 'cause ya certainly see more skin there.

and, don't ya'll realize that young folk like too get a rise of of their elders - like when bell bottoms and long hair pissed off their parnets in '60s and 70's.

what I can't understand is how people dressed back in Victorian days. layer after layer, no skin exposed. women went to the beach in a shoulder to below the knee costume,

not a swimsuit, but a costume

fashion is all herd mentality, and since department stores, it changes to suit each generation.
 
When I see sombody wearing their pants this way, they undermine their credibility with me instantly.
 
Less is more when it comes to clothing a hot guy.

I just don't understand how they keep them on at all.

I wish they'd just start wearing boxer briefs and forget the baggy pants/shorts.
 
Let sagger's sag. They want to show off their dingy ass underwear that's them looking stupid.
 
lucem-ferre said:
i totally agree.
Click to expand...

Ditto that.

derelictdarrel said:
When I see sombody wearing their pants this way, they undermine their credibility with me instantly.
Click to expand...

And that.

My favorite response to someone like that, with some ass exposed, was at a local grocery store. This guy had a girl on his arm and was practically sauntering like he wanted people to see the skin. The checker at the stand saw, finished with the customer to whom he was attending, then said "Excuse me" to the next one, and walked back to the ass.

"Pull the pants up like a man, or walk", he declared, loud enough for half the front of the store to hear. As he walked back to his station, there was applause. I joined in.


A runner-up was with a guy whose hairy fat ass was partly exposed. A chick in the group where he was made a comment, and he insulted her. So when he turned away, she pulled out her lighter and set fire to the exposed hair.

Everyone laughed. He stormed off. I gave her a thumb-up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top