.....
See though, the bible doesn't say anything about it.
Sure she's taught it, but you know what, she should of said "perhaps we shouldn't be taught that, and maybe we ought to step back and see what the bible really says..." In fact perhaps she shoudl denounce how homosexuality is viewed in the church and that educated people know, it's not because you're a sinner, or possesed by the devil. The definition of SIN is negative, and some preachers seem to decided what's sin and what is not sin.
I don't care if she's not "media savvy" it's not liek she had to answer the question to begin with.
So she could've said "no comment", and that would've sparked the same reaction because people would just assume she doesn't want to say anything bad about gay people because they're a big part of her fanbase, when inside she's really judging them.
Once again, you're criticizing the general consensus of Christianity, not Jennifer. As I said before, most GAY PEOPLE wouldn't be able to come up with a decent argument for pro-homosexuality in the Bible, how would you expect someone to come up with one on the spot who IS a Christian, but simply doesn't care one way or the other.
As I said before (I swear I've said that phrase 5 times already) what you're asking is for her to choose between being an all out let's go shopping fag hag, and a staunch bible thumping Christian. There's apparently not room in between.
If you've never experienced someone equatiing gay with stupid, and you don't think it's the same as equating gay with sin... then you need a simple lesson in negative connotations.
stupid = negative
sin = negative.
You avoided my point. I said there is a basis for saying being gay is a sin. There is no basis for saying being gay is stupid.
It's hardly irrepsonsible but it's irresponsible to not point out the problem with what she said.
There's different levels in the severity of a negative comment, her's though it may of been small, was still a negative comment none the less.
And again, you completely dodge the fact that you throw around the name calling, and seem to liek to call people "pathetic" who are "obsessed" and then go on how it's okay for you to be obsessed if you think other's are interested, but it's not okay if you don't liek the person.
That's not what I said. Re-read my post.
However I'll say I'm glad that the people who are obsessed with getting all these people to apologise to all these hateful words being thrown at people are obsessed, because it's working and they're apologising for the remakrs they said.
So in the end, your being quite hypocritical, because the title of this thread, and JD's post are his commentary. SO if that's makes him pathetic than by your standards you are pathetic as well.
Once again, re-read my post. All the threads I posted contained some sort of news, a picture, etc. He simply posted an entire thread with his opinion on the situation, when not only are there already threads about this exact discussion, but we were already discussing it in two other threads.
Anyhow, you seem to either be avoiding my points and responses, or simply just reading too fast because not only have I been repeating myself time and time again in this argument here with you, but almost everything I have said it something I've stated in the argument with JDsMagik (which by the way, has already ended if you haven't noticed). So I'm done repeating myself at this point. You can continue to be mad at Jennifer for simply answering a question she was asked if you like, I think you should focus on people who actually CARE if you're gay or straight, and are actually THUMPING their Bibles in your face.
I however, am done with this argument. It's going nowhere but in circles. Have a good night.
