Joe Scarborough On Obama 'Kill List'

[maxpowr9]

The article said that a 17 yr old girl was on the list, not that Obama approved of her being killed. It doesn't say one way or the other.

A 17 year old woman would be tried as an adult in a court of law. I don't see what the fuss is about.

Anyways, I totally misread the title of this topic as "Joe Scarborough on Obama's Hit List".

 

[Just_Believe18]

Haven't you ever thought that this has all grown beyond the constraints of what one man can do taking the title of president? Whether it's Obama, Romney, or a monkey in a hat, the federal government has used 9/11 as a consolidation of power under the interest of "national security." They have no intention of allowing any successive president from the Executive branch dismantling their hard-earned tyranny.

 

[chance1]

I generally find the Right to be very hypocritical. Not that the Left isn't either, but I find the Right to more so be hypocritical than the Left. Their mentality has lapsed to the point where "if Obama is for it, we are against it."

i completely disagree

I watch Fox News on Sunday Mornings and their neocons DO NOT criticize Obama for being too hawkish - i have never seen that

they criticize him for perceived weakness with Iran and not being pro Israel enough

but when he follows republican/conservative principles they do not

please provide evidence because i can't recall that ever happening - as it shouldn't i might add

 

[Stardreamer]

Oh that's an interesting notion!

Though dead people are harder to interrogate....

Which is the problem with the strategy and other attempts to fight a war from '5,000 feet'. You manage to avoid a lot of the political negatives but you also lose a lot of the flexibility and capability (like intelligence gathering) that having 'boots on the ground' get you.

 

[Kulindahr]

Which is the problem with the strategy and other attempts to fight a war from '5,000 feet'. You manage to avoid a lot of the political negatives but you also lose a lot of the flexibility and capability (like intelligence gathering) that having 'boots on the ground' get you.

Of course if our human intel was properly funded and backed we'd have plenty of intel beforehand.

 

[Jack Springer]

I generally find the Right to be very hypocritical. Not that the Left isn't either, but I find the Right to more so be hypocritical than the Left. Their mentality has lapsed to the point where "if Obama is for it, we are against it."

Why not post some proof to prove your belief.

Seems the left is not interested in Obama's baseball card killings selection. I've only seen the NYT's article.

 

[Kulindahr]

Why not post some proof to prove your belief.

Do you actually read this forum? Proof of right-wing hypocrisy abounds.

Here's an item: "traditional marriage".

 

[chuck10x]

Not too comfortable with targeted assasinations, especially american citizens.
Obama has adopted the Bush policies and gone much further, But where Bush was accused of war crimes, Obama gets a pass.
Go Figure.
Not to say it hasn't happened under other administrations, They just never admitted it.
There is a reason for that.
What happens if in the course of an assasination that Obama admitted, innocent people are killed?
Can he be held legally responsible?
What happens when a Republican president continues the practice, And cites Obama's policy of targeted assasinations as an excuse?
Remember when everyone thought it was great that Obama was bringing the soldiers home? He just replaced them with Drones.
Cheaper, deadlier and more effective, and soon to fly over the U.S.A. if the administration gets it's way.
Can you still call Obama a Democrat if his foreign policy is a Republican wet dream?

- - - Updated - - -

Not too comfortable with targeted assasinations, especially american citizens.
Obama has adopted the Bush policies and gone much further, But where Bush was accused of war crimes, Obama gets a pass.
Go Figure.
Not to say it hasn't happened under other administrations, They just never admitted it.
There is a reason for that.
What happens if in the course of an assasination that Obama admitted, innocent people are killed?
Can he be held legally responsible?
What happens when a Republican president continues the practice, And cites Obama's policy of targeted assasinations as an excuse?
Remember when everyone thought it was great that Obama was bringing the soldiers home? He just replaced them with Drones.
Cheaper, deadlier and more effective, and soon to fly over the U.S.A. if the administration gets it's way.
Can you still call Obama a Democrat if his foreign policy is a Republican wet dream?

 

[Kyanimal]

Seems the left is not interested in Obama's baseball card killings selection. I've only seen the NYT's article.

Um ... could someone please remind me who issued thousands of packs, of an entire deck, of Playing Card 'targets' in Iraq?

 

[Kulindahr]

Not too comfortable with targeted assasinations, especially american citizens.
Obama has adopted the Bush policies and gone much further, But where Bush was accused of war crimes, Obama gets a pass.
Go Figure.
Not to say it hasn't happened under other administrations, They just never admitted it.
There is a reason for that.
What happens if in the course of an assasination that Obama admitted, innocent people are killed?
Can he be held legally responsible?
What happens when a Republican president continues the practice, And cites Obama's policy of targeted assasinations as an excuse?
Remember when everyone thought it was great that Obama was bringing the soldiers home? He just replaced them with Drones.
Cheaper, deadlier and more effective, and soon to fly over the U.S.A. if the administration gets it's way.
Can you still call Obama a Democrat if his foreign policy is a Republican wet dream?

Reading this, I thought of the Long Walls and a war where Athenians steadily gave up their rights for the purpose of fighting their war, and ended up becoming the thing they hated.

 

[chance1]

just got some footage (grainy) but good audio of the President personally talking to some of those on the list

he's is one bad ass

 

[Telstra]

Didn't Joe Scarborough work for fox news? He should go there and debate.

 

[palbert]

Chance, suggest bike ride.

 

[chance1]

^ did u watch the video ? It's classic

Too hot outside

 

[palbert]

Electricity and tv up here is democrat. Have to go to NH for your slant. We bike to NH.

 

[JayHawk]

Hey chance what were you saying about ridiculous assertions and comparisons in CE&P just to bait and make people angry?

Here ya go... try some of your medicine.

 

[chance1]

^ a shame you've been indoctrinated

The diff is Liam Neeson in Taken as Barack bad ass Obama is funny

On most planets

It's not "I eat gay hating chicken cause it's cheap" funny but pretty damn close

 

[JayHawk]

Well i don't impune anyone's dignity except maybe my own. That of course is only someone's opinion and hardly matters.

Making childish comparisons is just as witless on either side of the aisle.

Perhaps to someone who watched a beloved friend or companion die of AIDS while republicans refused to mutter the words could make someone think they are animalistic like Nazis.

Perhaps the ideological zeal with which the republicans theocrats desire to remove our basic dignities allows some to believe they are as theologically insane as the Taliban.

It is extremely easy to make gross and inaccurate suggestions about others. Look at the last several hundred years of our policitcal process. However it is crazy to pout in one hand while telling people to 'nut up' on the other.

Just.

not.

Genuine.

 

[chance1]

Wow - seems like u turn on the uber serious side when u see fit

The :08 video is funny and NOTHING like what u mention

Sorry you're devoid of that emotion currently

I think it is one of your best qualities and sorely needed here

 

[JayHawk]

Actually you know what it makes me think of? A four year old... they will tell on their siblings to Mom if the sibling does anything wrong and then proceed to do the same thing wrong expecting it to be ok because they can rationalize it is for their own benefit.

This is the same thing. Your comparison makes your argument so it is OK... there goes against your logic so it is base behavior only fitting of animals. Kinda amusing tbh.