The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Katie Hopkins and claims 'there's no such thing as fat-shaming'

mikemizanin729

🍭😐😨😘😩&#128
JUB Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2014
Posts
16,691
Reaction score
51
Points
48
'Ultimately Kelly Clarkson is a chunky monkey': Katie Hopkins continues her attack and claims 'there's no such thing as fat-shaming'
She has been roundly criticized for her rude and inappropriate comments about Kelly Clarkson's weight on Twitter.

And now Katie Hopkins has taken her onslaught even further, claiming in an interview with Access Hollywood that 'there is no such thing as fat-shaming'.


free upload


The 40-year-old British TV personality went on to state that 'ultimately Kelly Clarkson is a chunky monkey' as she defended her offensive stance on the singer.

There is no such thing as fat-shaming,' Hopkins claimed. 'There is only skinny-blaming... It doesn't hurt me if I hurt someone's feelings.

'Ultimately if you put yourself out there, if you're in the media, if you're in the public eye, then you have to accept what comes your way.'

She went on to defend herself, saying that she was not a bully: 'That's not bullying, that's a great line.'


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...ues-attack-claims-s-no-thing-fat-shaming.html

Read her interview and lets hear back from you on the subject. Is Katie coming on to strong...??? Or not...???

Discuss.
 
Well Kelly is just becoming visually what she has always been--a white trash Texan---pretty sure Britney Spears will have the same fate.:p
 
Whatever she says is a reflection of her...it has nothing to do with Kelly Clarkson. What you say about other people always says a lot about you...and not much about them...

And yeah...of course there is "fat shaming"...I assume most of the people who don't get it practice it themselves.
 

In this interview Katie says that everyone wants to be a victim and that others encourage certain groups to be labeled as the victim. She also goes on to explain herself and that name calling does not bother her at all.
 
so 1st world folkeess cretins ten?
-quailfeed cretins-
$gentic modify cretin%
" UNI apoorveds cretin "
or nice folk

anyway

sex no 1 step 2 back 3 hold 4 note 5 drop 6 up 7 ans rotata

tinkyou
 
This woman looks how very well-preserved sixty year old divorcees look in my country. She's only forty. She should pipe down.
 
This woman looks how very well-preserved sixty year old divorcees

But Katie also laughs this off and doesn't make excuses or cry victim unlike Kelly.
 

In this interview Katie says that everyone wants to be a victim and that others encourage certain groups to be labeled as the victim. She also goes on to explain herself and that name calling does not bother her at all.

I can't watch the interview..but if she really thinks that.,..it should be OK for people to call other people the n word,...or faggot...or fucking queer...and lets see how far she gets with that....

The reason she is OK with fat shaming is because it is socially acceptable and tolerated by a lot of people...period..
 
Britney already did something about it. She stopped complaining and she took responsibility for her own doing.

There's plenty of time for her to revert back---I'm not a fan of either and don't much care if they are fat or not---I mean I love Adele and she's not exactly thin--but she carries herself well---I saw Kelly on Graham Norton and her weight looked very weird.
 
I can't watch the interview..but if she really thinks that.,..it should be OK for people to call other people the n word,...or faggot...or fucking queer...and lets see how far she gets with that....
She has a lot of friends within the gay community and fully understands that being gay or bisexual is not a choice but she does believe that being overweight is.

She explains two reasons as to why she dislikes this and one of them is the damage it's doing to the NHS and it's crippling the tax payer.
 
But Katie also laughs this off and doesn't make excuses or cry victim unlike Kelly.
Who on earth even thinks of Kelly Clarkson? I'm certain that most people my age and younger have difficulty summoning how she looks. Still, it's unconscionably rude to make fun of people for the incidentals of how they look.
 
...In this interview Katie says that everyone wants to be a victim and that others encourage certain groups to be labeled as the victim....

I think that's true in Britain and my country. It's a trend that's become apparent over the last ten years.

We're both welfare states and certain groups —and people with certain illnesses— are able to attract special status.
 
She has a lot of friends within the gay community and fully understands that being gay or bisexual is not a choice but she does believe that being overweight is.

She explains two reasons as to why she dislikes this and one of them is the damage it's doing to the NHS and it's crippling the tax payer.

Addiction is serious business...and addiction to food is definitely the least understood of them all. It is epidemic....

A lot of people overeat so they don't have to feel anything...same reason why they drink...gamble...take drugs...smoke...ect....

Shaming them does not help them.....
 
She was fun on BB, apart from that i have no interest in the harridan.
 
Well...Kelly Clarkson can lose some weight and not be a 'chunky monkey' (what the fuck does that even mean), but the OP's idol Katy will always be an ugly cunt.
 
I think that's true in Britain and my country. It's a trend that's become apparent over the last ten years.

We're both welfare states and certain groups —and people with certain illnesses— are able to attract special status.

Exactly and it costs billions and the NHS is already in trouble as it is. There should be some kind of cap on how much treatment they should receive from the taxpayer and benefits that they receive.
 

Katie may very well be controversial to some, but she speaks some truth and Katie believes that she is only saying what others THINK but never speak up about. She believes in a world in which women (such as Kelly) need to stop playing the victim and start doing something about their insecurities.

She does NOT believe in cuddling and false hope and she does NOT believe in romantic nonsense. She speaks from the heart and she does NOT have time for those who make excuse after excuse which results in the taxpayer having to pay the price.
 
She is of no use to health campaigners at all - she does it to make the news all about her not the topic. If you notice she always makes the issue about individual people whom she choices to attack, rather than ever bothering to look at what might be the wider causes of the problem.

It has to be all about her - she is a washed up reality TV star, trading off being rude. She does not care one bit about health or well-being, she just wants to be rude.
 
Back
Top