The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Kenosha Shootings during Jacob Blake Protests [SPLIT]

Yes, you do. Immediately, it's what you wrote next.

No, believe that the cop and teen will both be charged and probably rightfully so.

However...context matters and a lot is being omitted or flat out twisted in the narrative on both stories.
 
No, believe that the cop and teen will both be charged and probably rightfully so.

However...context matters and a lot is being omitted or flat out twisted in the narrative on both stories.

Where are you getting all this supposed "context?" and yes you did excuse and defend, you just tried to backhand it in thinking no one would notice.
 
Strange how the White guy doing the killing always seems to be the real victim.

sigh.

This.

And this is what is so depressing.

This is what makes me lose hope in America some days. (and Canada too).
 
For one...

Multiple news headlines stating "police shoot black man as he was walking away from them"

No, he was reaching into his vehicle defying orders of police with their weapons drawn after verbally admitting he had a knife.

Neither justify being shot in the back but those are two very different narratives being portrayed.
 
I do not defend the shooting of Blake

...but what is NOT being told in the story is that at least one of the victims shot by Kyle pointed a pistol at him almost point blank while being attached by another.

the two guys in the street were victims#2 and#3


before Kyle Rittenhouse made his way down the street where he was confronted by victims#2 and #3 he had already shot victim#1 in the head in a parking lot


there's vid of him standing over/next to? the body..it appears also to show him talking on a phone saying that he had just killed somebody

Rittenhouse deserved to have a pistol pulled on him
 
I see that Wisconsin prosecutors have charged 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse on six counts — including first degree reckless homicide and first degree intentional homicide — in the shooting deaths of two people in Kenosha on Tuesday.

It seems pretty cut and dried.

Meanwhile Ann Coulter wants this kid as her president and Tucker Carlson is praising him.
 
Just gonna pick this a part.

I do not defend the shooting of Blake

I do not defend the shooting by Kyle

...but what is NOT being told in the story is that at least one of the victims shot by Kyle pointed a pistol at him almost point blank while being attached by another.

No, that is not what is being told, what you're trying to spin is inaccurate. Two men who were unarmed tried to stop Kyle, were killed and then someone with a pistol approached him. It wasn't like he was immediately approached with a gun, someone did after he killed two people. If you're going to complain about narrative, don't create your own.

Why was the white guy not mowed down like the black guy IMO?...because the white guy was approaching police with hands up, rifle on his back and not threat to them vs ignoring commands in a life treating situation. Right or wrong, respect for law enforcement and complying is simply why the white guy is alive and the black guy is not.

Not complying shouldn't resolve into using deadly force, no matter how people want to spin. Cops have tools they can use that are non-lethal for people that don't comply, so there is really no excuse.

And that is beside the fact of this narrative that is spun that complying with Police will somehow stop these incidents from happening when there have been cases where black people have complied and still have been shot or killed.

Both stories are being twisted to fit a narrative without the entire context being told of what happen before, during and after. While neither are probably in the right what American is being fed in an edited manipulated context is sickening

Just like you tried to twist the narrative here when you claimed Kyle was approached by someone with a pistol to try and spin some self defense non-sense like every other defender of this piece of shit. Interesting that seems to be absent with what he is being charged with, which is intentional homicide.
 
So am I to assume that there will be nothing said when Black people start to walk exercise their second amendment rights and start to walk around with long guns, and then form their own militias? Because I can guarantee that is what is going to happen next. Tucker and the rest of the right wind echo chamber will celebrate them as heroes and true patriots! Right, right?????
 
So am I to assume that there will be nothing said when Black people start to walk exercise their second amendment rights and start to walk around with long guns, and then form their own militias? Because I can guarantee that is what is going to happen next. Tucker and the rest of the right wind echo chamber will celebrate them as heroes and true patriots! Right, right?????

White people can arm themselves and take over Government building with no Police firing a gun but whenever a black person reaches for anything, they'll be shot on the spot and excuses will be made about it. If people can't see the difference and problems with this, then they're a part of the problem when it comes to systematic racism.
 
I see that Wisconsin prosecutors have charged 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse on six counts — including first degree reckless homicide and first degree intentional homicide — in the shooting deaths of two people in Kenosha on Tuesday.

It seems pretty cut and dried.


Meanwhile Ann Coulter wants this kid as her president and Tucker Carlson is praising him.

Nope, i don't see that at all. According to the video, he was trying to defend property and defend himself.
 
^ You are totally out of your depth here.

This 17 year old kid travelled from Illinois to Kenosha Wisconsin.

He has no role or right to take it upon himself to protect property in a neighbouring state.

He was on a hunting expedition.

And he sure as fuck wasn't 'defending' himself when he murdered the first person and injured the second.

He was out after curfew and breaking the law by openly carrying a gun in Wisconsin.

For fuck's sakes. Stop trying to make him the victim.
 
Nope, i don't see that at all. According to the video, he was trying to defend property and defend himself.

Bullshit, If that kid had been Black and named Kwame Ross he would be dead now as well. They would have put more bullets in him than Jacob Blake for sure.
 
Trump's fake Kenosha photo-op:

When President Donald Trump visited Kenosha, Wisconsin, on Tuesday to tour sites affected by civil unrest following the police shooting of Jacob Blake, he surveyed Rode's Camera Shop.

Standing next to him was a man the White House, and president, identified as the owner of the destroyed store, John Rode III.

But another man, Tom Gram, told the local outlet TMJ4 that he's actually owned the 109-year-old store for eight years — and had declined to join Trump's photo op.

Gram is accusing Trump of using his shop for political gain and replacing him with the shop's former owner.

"I think everything he does turns into a circus, and I just didn't want to be involved in it," Gram told TMJ4.

The store, which opened in 1911, was destroyed last week, Kenosha News reported. The storefront windows were smashed, and the building was looted and set on fire.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/kenosha-business-owner-says-declined-052609187.html

 
Did anyone see the videos of this POS sucker punching a girl before youtube took them down?
 
^ Thank you for that. I'm glad it's getting out there that it was a fake photo-op for a fake president.
 
^ Thank you for that. I'm glad it's getting out there that it was a fake photo-op for a fake president.

The guy they used in the photo op had not owned the business for 8 years. Eight years! And the real owner had specifically refused to have Trump do a photo op at the store.

All White House press shops setup photo ops and they do shape the story to fit an agenda. This wasn't that. Trump clearly says "John Rode III, owner of Rode's Camera Shop" which is a lie. He also says the business was the "oldest in the nation" which is another lie.

Lies. Lies. Lies. Lies.
 
^ I knew about the 8 years and I also knew that the current owner worked at the store for 4 years before he bought it. He had been in the store for 12 years and owned it for 8 of them.

I'm glad he's speaking up about the lies and deception.
 
Back
Top