The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Kim Kardashians booty could be a work of art.


image uploading


I was watching keeping up with the Kardasians earlier and she is very beautiful.


What do you all think of her...??? She is sexy and talented.
 
She has an awful amount of foundation cream on her face. Got a picture without makeup?
 
"no makeup selfie "

You have to be blind if you genuinely think that is without makeup.
 
^ Kim assured all her fans that she had no make up on during the selfie. The media also confirmed this to be true.


I think she's a natural beauty.
 
Goodness knows what I am doing in this thread but honestly do you really believe that photo is without makeup?
 
A more realistic shot.

attachment.php
 
The Media have made her look rough in pics before, but anyone can tell their fake.


Kim Kardashian is natural and hot.
 
mikemizanin729 said:
The Media have made her look rough in pics before, but anyone can tell their fake.


Kim Kardashian is natural and hot.
Click to expand...

Do you see what you are doing? I am not saying she is ugly in that photo just that it is more realistic. The fact she is without makeup just shows up the difference between the before and after. Make up is a means of enhancing appearance and covering up natural faults; most women look incredibly beautiful in photos.

You on the other hand are saying that if you don't agree with it, either it is a fake or a media plot to discredit her.
 
dpnice said:
Do you see what you are doing? I am not saying she is ugly in that photo just that it is more realistic. The fact she is without makeup just shows up the difference between the before and after. Make up is a means of enhancing appearance and covering up natural faults; most women look incredibly beautiful in photos.

You on the other hand are saying that if you don't agree with it, either it is a fake or a media plot to discredit her.
Click to expand...

She's outside though? I don't think she would go out looking like that without knowing that she'll easily get a snapshot taken. The media do enhance those pics to make them look bad.
 
mikemizanin729 said:
Aparently Kims butt images may be ART after all. I did tell you all that it was.

:=D:




Will Gompertz blog: Could Kim Kardashian’s bottom be a work of art.

After a week in which the reality TV star's famous derriere has featured large in the media, which included a report in The Sun claiming she had commissioned an "artistic statue" of her bottom, the BBC's Will Gompertz asks how the art world might judge such an object: Art or artefact?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-30155434

I told you all it was a work of art. Nudety can be art and the images released to the public do look very artistic
Click to expand...

Booty? Maybe Art with a silent F. Someone call Jeff Koons!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top