- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,824
- Reaction score
- 4,067
- Points
- 113
Re: So homos for Trump....What do you think of your hero Now?
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man.
Thomas Paine, Rights of Man.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoTo register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Legislatures Have Given Rights To Corporations [SPLIT]
- Thread starter Benvolio
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,824
- Reaction score
- 4,067
- Points
- 113
Re: So homos for Trump....What do you think of your hero Now?
And you claim to have studied constitutional law?
No way anyone who spouts about originalism in the Constitution cannot know that! If you don't agree with it (someone educated in constitutional law would understand the historical context), you cannot possibly support originalism, because you oppose the very foundation of the Constitution.
That document begins "We, the people". Why does it do that? Because the government is nothing but an artificial entity with no attributes but those the people should assign to it. And the people can assign powers only because all rights, power, and authority reside in them -- and under the paradigm of the Founders and Framers, all rights, power and authority reside in the people because they were bestowed on them by the Creator, and anything not from the Creator does not exist. This is why the Founding Fathers could say that it is not merely permissible but a duty to disobey an unjust law: an unjust law constitutes rebellion against the Creator on the part of the government, and a government in rebellion against the Creator must be opposed by everyone. Adams defended the right of insurrection before the Supreme Court, on the basis of Jefferson's words in the Declaration, but if you read Jefferson, you would be aware that it is not so much a right of insurrection against tyranny, but a duty.
And you claim to have studied constitutional law?
No way anyone who spouts about originalism in the Constitution cannot know that! If you don't agree with it (someone educated in constitutional law would understand the historical context), you cannot possibly support originalism, because you oppose the very foundation of the Constitution.
That document begins "We, the people". Why does it do that? Because the government is nothing but an artificial entity with no attributes but those the people should assign to it. And the people can assign powers only because all rights, power, and authority reside in them -- and under the paradigm of the Founders and Framers, all rights, power and authority reside in the people because they were bestowed on them by the Creator, and anything not from the Creator does not exist. This is why the Founding Fathers could say that it is not merely permissible but a duty to disobey an unjust law: an unjust law constitutes rebellion against the Creator on the part of the government, and a government in rebellion against the Creator must be opposed by everyone. Adams defended the right of insurrection before the Supreme Court, on the basis of Jefferson's words in the Declaration, but if you read Jefferson, you would be aware that it is not so much a right of insurrection against tyranny, but a duty.
Re: So homos for Trump....What do you think of your hero Now?
So God created the right to indictment in capital cases? And the right to bear arms? Search warrants? Jury trial? Rights of way? Rights of first refusal? Nonsense. And the founding fathers did not believe that, but believed in "certain rights" endowed by God.
You know that I have often spoken for democracy against your democrats. I have repeatedly objected to judicial amendments to the constitution because it robs us of our democracy. The people adopt a constitution which confers legal rights, and empowers the government to enact laws and enforce them. Yes that authority comes from the people. But then the government,among other things creates aditional enforceable rights. Among other things governments enact statutes allowing creation of corporations and giving them rights and powers.
So God created the right to indictment in capital cases? And the right to bear arms? Search warrants? Jury trial? Rights of way? Rights of first refusal? Nonsense. And the founding fathers did not believe that, but believed in "certain rights" endowed by God.
You know that I have often spoken for democracy against your democrats. I have repeatedly objected to judicial amendments to the constitution because it robs us of our democracy. The people adopt a constitution which confers legal rights, and empowers the government to enact laws and enforce them. Yes that authority comes from the people. But then the government,among other things creates aditional enforceable rights. Among other things governments enact statutes allowing creation of corporations and giving them rights and powers.
heir-to-the-wind
JUB Addict
Re: So homos for Trump....What do you think of your hero Now?
Correct. The Zenger case of 1735, for example, established freedom of the press.
Correct. The Zenger case of 1735, for example, established freedom of the press.