The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Less Than Great First AP Review of "Avatar"

Joshua_me

IntoxicatedwithHunkiness
Joined
Jun 2, 2003
Posts
18,049
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
Portland, Or.
[FONT=Verdana,Sans-serif]AP review: Effects wow but story limps in `Avatar'[/FONT][FONT=Verdana,Sans-serif][FONT=Verdana,Sans-Serif]Email this Story[/FONT]Dec 11, 11:45 AM (ET)

By JAKE COYLE
When a film brashly asserts that it will change moviemaking forever, one feels the urge to either take its "king of the world" arrogance down a notch or hail it as the masterpiece it claims to be.
But - and forgive us if this sounds too much like the dialogue in President Obama's war room - what if there's a third option?
James Cameron's 3-D "Avatar" has all the smack of a Film Not To Miss - a movie whose effects are clearly revolutionary, a spectacle that millions will find adventure in. But it nevertheless feels unsatisfying and somehow lacks the pulse of a truly alive film.
"Avatar" takes place in the year 2154 on the faraway moon of Pandora, where, befitting its mythological name, the ills of human life have been released. The Earth depleted, humans have arrived to mine an elusive mineral, wryly dubbed Unobtainium.
The Resources Developmental Administration, a kind of military contractor, is running the operation. At the top of the chain of command is the CEO-like Carter Selfridge (an excellent, ruthless Giovanni Ribisi), who's hellbent on showing quarterly profits for shareholders. His muscle and head of security is the rock-jawed Col. Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who curses Pandora's inhabitants (the Na'vi) as savages and considers the place worse than hell.
In fact, it's a paradise. In Pandora, Cameron has fashioned a sensual, neon-colored, dreamlike world of lush jungle, gargantuan trees and floating mountains. Its splendor is easily the most wondrous aspect of "Avatar."
Cameron, like the deep sea diver that he is (his only films since 1997's "Titanic" have been underwater documentaries), lets his camera peer with fascination at the glow-in-the-dark plant life, the six-legged horses and - especially beautiful - the nighttime frog-like creatures that, when touched, open a bright white sail and spiral into the air.
It's this sense of discovery - in Pandora, in the wizardry of the filmmaking - that makes "Avatar" often thrilling.
Our main character is Jake Sully (Sam Worthington), a brawny former Marine who lost the power of his legs in battle on Earth. His scientist twin brother has just died and Sully, having a matching genome, is invited to replace him in a mission to Pandora.
He joins a small group of scientists led by Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver) who are attempting to learn more about the Na'vi by conducting field studies and doing a bit of undercover science. They've created avatars of themselves to go about Pandora as a living, breathing Na'vi, while their human bodies lie dormant in a sort of tanning bed (they return to them when their avatars sleep).
The Na'vi are a 10-foot-tall species with translucent, aqua-colored skin, 3-fingered hands and smooth, lean torsos. They have long, neat dreadlocks for hair and wide, feline foreheads. The smart freckles on their brow faintly light up like tiny constellations.
With beady headdresses and skimpy sashes, the Na'vi are clearly meant to evoke Native Americans, as well as similarly exploited tribes of South America and Africa. They pray over slain animals and feel at one with nature. Their tails (oh, yes, they also have tails) even connect - like nature's USB port - to things like mystical willow branches, horse manes or the hair of pterodactyl-like birds.
It's no coincidence that the Na'vi chief Eyukan is played by the Cherokee actor Wes Studi, whose credits include "Dances with Wolves," perhaps the film most thematically akin to "Avatar."
"Avatar," which Cameron wrote as well as directed, is essentially a fairy tale that imagines a more favorable outcome for the oppressed fighting against the technology and might of Western Civilization. Sully, who quickly takes to life as a Na'vi, begins to feel his allegiances blurred.
Though he has promised Quaritch to spy on the Na'vi (their home lies atop an Unobtainium deposit), he begins to appreciate their ways. He also falls for Neytiri (Zoe Saldana), the Na'vi princess and the one who introduces him to the tribe.
Many Na'vi are suspicious of Sully - "a demon in a fake body" - but they eventually embrace him. They accept him as a leader, even though he occasionally goes limp and vacant when his human body isn't connected. This off-switch makes for questionable leadership skills - as if George Washington had been a narcoleptic.
The inevitable battle has overt shades of current wars. Quaritch, drinking coffee during a bombing with a cavalier callousness like Robert Duvall in "Apocalypse Now," drops phrases like "pre-emptive strike,""fight terror with terror" and even "shock and awe," a term apparently destined to survive for centuries in the lexicon.
These historical and contemporary overtones bring the otherworldly "Avatar" down to Earth and down to cliche. The message of environmentalism and of (literal) tree-hugging resonates, but such a plainly just cause also saps "Avatar" of drama and complexity.
It's also a funny message coming from such a swaggering behemoth of technology like "Avatar." As for the effects, they are undeniable. 3-D has recently become en vogue, but only now has it been used with such a depth of field.
The movie is also a notable advance for performance capture, which is how the Na'vi were created. As was done with Gollum in "The Lord of the Rings" and King Kong in "King Kong," the Na'vi were made with cameras and sensors recording the movements of the actors and transposing them onto CGI creatures.
Seldom has this been done in a way that captured the most important thing - the eyes - but Cameron employed a new technology (a camera rigged like a helmet on the actors) to capture their faces up close. The green, flickering eyes of the Na'vi are a big step forward, but there's still an unmistakable emptiness to a movie so filled with digital creations.
Ultimately, the technology of "Avatar" isn't the problem - moviemaking, itself, is an exercise in technology. But one need look no further than Wes Anderson's "Fantastic Mr. Fox" to see how technique - whether it be antique stop-motion animation or state-of-the-art 3-D performance capture - can find soulfulness at 24 frames per second.
"Avatar," a 20th Century Fox release, is rated PG-13 for intense epic battle sequences and warfare, sensuality, language and some smoking. Running time: 161 minutes. Two and half stars out of four.
---

[/FONT]
 
[FONT=Verdana,Sans-serif]It's also a funny message coming from such a swaggering behemoth of technology like "Avatar." As for the effects, they are undeniable. 3-D has recently become en vogue, but only now has it been used with such a depth of field.

[/FONT]

I saw a report about the 3D on television and, apparently, it makes a lot of people physically ill to the point of vomiting. A lot more people feel nauseous, but manage to keep their hot-buttered popcorn in their bellies.
 
This movie sounds worse than I thought. I don't understand all the hype around it.
 
Well, good luck to Cameron.

It's another movie that has to gross $ 350-400 million domestically to break even.
 
It does have a high metascore. The general consensus in the reviews is that the special effects are awesome, but the story is relatively boring compared to other James Cameron movies.
 
We had planned on seeing it tonight, but the theaters here showing it in 3-D are sold out until Sunday afternoon ! :eek:

I don't see the point in seeing it "2-D", so I guess I'll wait....
 
We're just back from Avatar-3D...

The CGI is great, but the story with the stereotypical Aliens-type human cast (it even had Sigourney Weaver) just wasn't working very well in this setting.

In Aliens, the cast helped build up the tension (as the drama comes from the humans and their stupid/selfish/heroic decisions in their relationship to the monster), here the 'enemy' wasn't a monster, so that whole idea fell flat on its face.
 
I have to eat any negative remarks I made before I saw this movie in IMAX 3D. Definitely the best movie experience I can recall in ages. I feel sorry for those who don't have an IMAX near them and don't watch it in 3D, because it would be a totally unintended different movie that way. The main purpose and story of the movie is about an out of body experience. You can't feel that out of body experience of the story without the IMAX 3D. No doubt the movie will get undeserved criticism by folks missing out seeing it the way it was intended.

I must say Cameron is genius the way he put it all together. And the story is very satisfying; well serving for a 3D experience. Yes some scenes appeared borrowed from Cameron's other movies, but it works very well in this movie. And unlike those Robert Zemeckis CGI movies (Polar Express, Beowulf, Christmas Carol), the CGI characters are not soulless. The $15 I paid felt like a bargain for this experience...|
 
Just came back from the IMAX 3D version of this movie and loved it! The storyline certainly is not original and borrows elements from everywhere but it works perfectly well to keep me incredibly entertained for almost three hours. The CGI was incredible and sucked me in immediately. Looking back there were a few very cheesy moments the movie could have done without (Oh, and especially that 3 second sex scene - that was really weird) but it didn't detract from the experience at all at the time. I'd definitely recommend everybody to see this movie in 3D to truly experience it as it was intended.

Oh, and Sam Worthington being incredibly hot didn't really hurt either.
 
I loved it as well, and yeah the imax is a must for this movie. I can see it being totally different on a regular screen.

I did not think the story sucked like the reviews said, and the characters, despite being cg were very real and lifelike imo.

Great movie overall. I will probably see it again which doesn't usually happen.
 
I just caught the movie in 3d fucking amazing! Love the shit out of it! by far 1 of my favorite movie this year.

Yeah I'd watch it again! The char definitely felt very very real. Amazing!

I'll give it 10 thumb up but I only have 2. :P
 
Just came back from the IMAX 3D version of this movie and loved it! The storyline certainly is not original and borrows elements from everywhere but it works perfectly well to keep me incredibly entertained for almost three hours. The CGI was incredible and sucked me in immediately. Looking back there were a few very cheesy moments the movie could have done without (Oh, and especially that 3 second sex scene - that was really weird) but it didn't detract from the experience at all at the time. I'd definitely recommend everybody to see this movie in 3D to truly experience it as it was intended.

Oh, and Sam Worthington being incredibly hot didn't really hurt either.

I was hook into the whole plot and the amazing scenery. I felt I was in the movie. wow! Everyone should go watch it in 3D.

Sorry double post!
 
I just saw it also and loved it. It was a lot of fun. We see so many movies where aliens invade our world that it was a cool twist to see us invade another world. The military comes off so bad in this though. Made me hate them. It kinda felt like how the US bulldozes over other countries to take what we want. There was almost a comparison with the rock they wanted to oil. Wonder if that was his goal with the plot.
 
Just saw this Movie in 3D, it was Amazing. This is my first 3D movie Ive seen and I didnt get sick at all. I was completely blown away by the special effects, the CG looked so real. Matter of fact the combination of both 3D and CG made me feel like I was in the movie. Def recommend this movie, matter of Fact I want to see this movie in IMAX 3D now.
 
Two friends saw it this weekend and both agreed technically amazing, but otherwise not a great movie.

One loves this genre so he saw it 3D on friday night to a half empty theatre and IMAX today.

There other has a degree in film. He saw it on IMAX to packed theater Saturday night.

Even though the movie raked in 73 million, it was below projections.
 
There other has a degree in film.
:rolleyes:
Like this disqualifies everyone else's opinions or nobody else is entitled to judge a movie.
The reason box office figures may be below as expected is because many people are waiting to see it in IMAX 3D. Obviously, IMAX has a limited number of theaters so many people have been met with sold out theaters. Lets revisit the box office figure's in about a month.
 
Avatar did better than predicted, with Fox putting it at a conservative 60 Million dollar weekend. Considering the blizzards on the east coast, and that it had the highest start ever of any non-sequel, non-adapted movie I'd say it had a very successful first weekend.
 
Back
Top